Which Statement Accurately Compares the Essay and the Video

Which Statement Accurately Compares The Essay And The Video regarding civil rights movements from 1960 to 1980? At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we offer a detailed analysis to provide clarity on this question. This involves examining content, purpose, and audience to distinguish key differences. Understanding these distinctions aids in gaining a comprehensive view of civil rights advocacy. We address the civil rights expansion, activism comparison, and analysis perspective.

1. Understanding the Civil Rights Movement: Essay vs. Video

The Civil Rights Movement, a pivotal era in American history, witnessed significant strides towards equality and justice for marginalized groups. Understanding the nuances of this movement requires examining various sources, including written essays and video documentaries. While both mediums aim to convey information and perspectives, they differ significantly in their approach, content, and impact.

1.1 The Power of Written Essays

Written essays provide a platform for in-depth analysis, critical examination, and nuanced arguments. Authors can meticulously research, organize, and present their ideas, offering readers a comprehensive understanding of complex issues. Essays allow for detailed exploration of historical events, legal frameworks, and social contexts, enabling readers to engage with the subject matter on an intellectual level.

1.2 The Visceral Impact of Video

Video documentaries, on the other hand, offer a visual and auditory experience that can evoke emotions and create a sense of immediacy. Through interviews, archival footage, and compelling narratives, videos can bring history to life, making it more accessible and engaging for a wider audience. Videos can capture the personal stories and struggles of individuals, allowing viewers to connect with the human dimension of the Civil Rights Movement.

1.3 Key Differences in Approach

The essay typically uses analytical and argumentative approaches, relying on evidence and reasoning to support its claims. The video utilizes narrative and visual techniques to present information, often focusing on storytelling and emotional impact. The essay can delve into intricate details and complex theories, while the video tends to simplify and streamline information for broader consumption.

2. Analyzing the Content: Essay and Video Perspectives

When comparing the content of an essay and a video on the Civil Rights Movement, it’s crucial to consider the specific topics covered, the perspectives presented, and the overall scope of the analysis.

2.1 Scope and Depth of Coverage

An essay might focus on a specific aspect of the movement, such as the legal strategies employed by civil rights activists or the role of grassroots organizations. It can provide an exhaustive analysis of primary sources, scholarly interpretations, and historical contexts. A video, on the other hand, might offer a broader overview of the movement, covering key events, figures, and themes. It may sacrifice depth for breadth, aiming to provide a general understanding of the topic.

2.2 Perspective and Bias

Both essays and videos can be influenced by the author’s or filmmaker’s perspective and biases. An essay might reflect a particular ideological stance or historical interpretation. A video might be shaped by the director’s artistic vision or the agenda of the funding organization. It’s essential to critically evaluate the content of both mediums, considering the potential biases and limitations.

2.3 Evidence and Accuracy

Essays typically rely on textual evidence, such as primary sources, historical documents, and scholarly articles, to support their claims. Videos may incorporate visual evidence, such as archival footage, photographs, and interviews. It’s crucial to assess the accuracy and reliability of the evidence presented in both mediums. Check for proper citations, fact-checking, and verification of sources.

3. The Impact of Brown v. Board of Education

The landmark Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education (1954) stands as a cornerstone in the fight against racial segregation in the United States. This pivotal decision declared state-sponsored segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the “separate but equal” doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).

3.1 The Legal and Social Context

Plessy v. Ferguson had legitimized racial segregation for nearly six decades, allowing states to maintain separate facilities for white and Black Americans as long as they were deemed “equal.” In reality, these facilities were rarely equal, and segregation perpetuated systemic inequality and discrimination.

3.2 The Brown Decision and Its Aftermath

Brown v. Board of Education challenged this legal precedent, arguing that segregated schools were inherently unequal and violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. The Supreme Court unanimously agreed, recognizing the detrimental effects of segregation on Black children’s self-esteem and educational opportunities.

3.3 Resistance and Implementation

Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, desegregation faced fierce resistance, particularly in the South. Many states and local communities refused to comply with the Brown decision, leading to protracted legal battles and social unrest. The slow and uneven implementation of desegregation highlighted the deep-seated racial prejudice and systemic barriers that continued to plague American society.

4. The Southern Manifesto and “Massive Resistance”

In response to Brown v. Board of Education, many white southerners mobilized to resist desegregation efforts. This resistance took various forms, including legal challenges, political maneuvering, and acts of intimidation and violence.

4.1 The Southern Manifesto

In 1956, more than 100 members of Congress signed the “Southern Manifesto,” a document denouncing the Brown decision as an overreach of judicial power and a violation of states’ rights. The manifesto pledged to use all lawful means to resist desegregation, signaling a widespread defiance of federal authority.

4.2 “Massive Resistance” Strategies

Southern states employed a variety of strategies to maintain segregation, including closing public schools, establishing private schools for white students, and enacting laws designed to circumvent desegregation orders. This “massive resistance” created a climate of hostility and fear, making it difficult for Black students to access equal educational opportunities.

4.3 The Little Rock Crisis

The 1957 Little Rock Crisis exemplified the intensity of resistance to desegregation. When nine Black students attempted to enroll at Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, Governor Orval Faubus deployed the National Guard to prevent them from entering. President Dwight D. Eisenhower intervened by sending federal troops to enforce the court’s desegregation order and protect the students.

The Little Rock Crisis garnered national attention and underscored the federal government’s commitment to upholding the Constitution and ensuring equal rights for all citizens.

5. Busing as a Tool for Desegregation

To address persistent racial segregation in schools, courts began ordering busing as a means of achieving racial balance. Busing involved transporting students from predominantly Black neighborhoods to predominantly white schools, and vice versa.

5.1 The Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education Decision

In Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971), the Supreme Court upheld the use of busing as a legitimate tool for desegregation. The Court recognized that residential segregation often perpetuated school segregation and that busing could be an effective way to dismantle dual school systems.

5.2 The Controversy Surrounding Busing

Busing proved to be highly controversial, sparking intense opposition from both white and Black communities. White parents often objected to having their children bused to schools in Black neighborhoods, citing concerns about safety and academic quality. Black parents sometimes opposed busing, arguing that it placed an unfair burden on Black students and that the focus should be on improving the quality of schools in Black communities.

5.3 The Boston Busing Crisis

The Boston busing crisis of the mid-1970s was one of the most violent and divisive episodes in the history of desegregation. When a federal court ordered the desegregation of Boston’s public schools, white residents in South Boston and other neighborhoods violently protested the busing plan, leading to clashes with police and racial tensions.

6. Milliken v. Bradley and the Limits of Desegregation

The Supreme Court’s decision in Milliken v. Bradley (1974) placed significant limitations on the scope of desegregation efforts. The case involved a desegregation plan for Detroit, Michigan, that would have required the integration of suburban school districts with the predominantly Black Detroit school district.

6.1 The Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court struck down the Detroit plan, ruling that suburban school districts could not be forced to participate in desegregation efforts unless they had been found guilty of intentional discrimination. The Court reasoned that suburban districts should not be penalized for the residential patterns that had led to racial segregation in Detroit.

6.2 The Impact of Milliken v. Bradley

Milliken v. Bradley had a significant impact on desegregation efforts nationwide. It limited the ability of courts to implement regional desegregation plans that crossed district lines, effectively reinforcing the racial segregation of schools in many metropolitan areas. The decision also signaled a shift in the Supreme Court’s approach to desegregation, with a growing emphasis on local control and individual choice.

6.3 The End of Mandatory Busing

By the late 1990s, mandatory busing had largely fallen out of favor as a desegregation tool. Courts began to dismantle busing plans and replace them with alternative strategies, such as magnet schools, school choice programs, and targeted investments in under-resourced schools.

7. School Choice and the Pursuit of Educational Equity

In recent years, school choice has emerged as a prominent strategy for promoting educational equity and improving student outcomes. School choice programs allow parents to select the public or private school that they believe best meets their children’s needs, regardless of their geographic location or socioeconomic status.

7.1 Types of School Choice Programs

School choice programs take various forms, including charter schools, voucher programs, tax-credit scholarships, and open enrollment policies. Charter schools are publicly funded, independently operated schools that are exempt from many of the regulations that govern traditional public schools. Voucher programs provide parents with public funds to pay for tuition at private schools. Tax-credit scholarships allow individuals and corporations to receive tax credits for donating to scholarship funds that help low-income students attend private schools. Open enrollment policies allow students to attend public schools outside of their assigned attendance zones.

7.2 The Debate Over School Choice

School choice is a highly debated topic, with proponents arguing that it empowers parents, promotes competition among schools, and improves student outcomes. Opponents argue that school choice diverts resources from traditional public schools, exacerbates segregation, and undermines the principle of equal educational opportunity.

7.3 The Impact of School Choice on Desegregation

The impact of school choice on desegregation is a complex and contested issue. Some studies have found that school choice programs can promote integration by allowing students to attend schools with diverse student populations. Other studies have found that school choice programs can exacerbate segregation by allowing white and affluent students to leave traditional public schools and enroll in private or charter schools.

8. Comparing Northern and Southern School Segregation

While racial segregation in schools was a pervasive issue across the United States, its manifestation differed significantly between the North and the South. Understanding these differences is crucial to grasping the complexities of the Civil Rights Movement and its impact on education.

8.1 De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation

In the South, segregation was enshrined in law through Jim Crow laws, which mandated separate schools and other public facilities for white and Black Americans. This is known as de jure segregation, meaning segregation by law. In the North, segregation was often the result of residential patterns, discriminatory housing practices, and school district policies. This is known as de facto segregation, meaning segregation in practice, even if not explicitly required by law.

8.2 Legal Challenges and Resistance

In the South, legal challenges to segregation focused on overturning Jim Crow laws and desegregating public schools. These challenges faced fierce resistance from white southerners, who employed a variety of tactics to maintain segregation. In the North, legal challenges focused on addressing discriminatory housing practices and school district policies that contributed to de facto segregation.

8.3 Busing and Desegregation Efforts

Busing was used as a desegregation tool in both the North and the South, but it often faced different challenges. In the South, busing was primarily aimed at dismantling dual school systems and integrating schools that had been legally segregated. In the North, busing was often aimed at addressing racial imbalances in schools that were the result of residential segregation.

9. Analyzing Racial Imbalance Act

The Racial Imbalance Act, enacted in Massachusetts in 1965, aimed to address racial imbalances in public schools. This law declared any school with a student population that was more than 50 percent nonwhite to be racially imbalanced.

9.1 Purpose and Intent

The Racial Imbalance Act sought to promote integration by encouraging school districts to reduce the concentration of nonwhite students in certain schools. The law aimed to improve educational opportunities for all students, regardless of their race or ethnicity.

9.2 Impact and Controversy

The Racial Imbalance Act had a significant impact on public schools in Massachusetts, particularly in cities like Boston. The law led to the implementation of busing plans and other desegregation efforts, which sparked intense controversy and resistance. Critics argued that the law placed an unfair burden on nonwhite students and that it failed to address the underlying causes of racial segregation.

9.3 The Legacy of the Racial Imbalance Act

The Racial Imbalance Act remains a controversial topic in Massachusetts. While some view it as a well-intentioned effort to promote integration, others see it as a flawed and divisive policy that ultimately failed to achieve its goals. The legacy of the Racial Imbalance Act continues to shape debates about education and equity in Massachusetts.

10. The Supreme Court and School Desegregation

The Supreme Court played a pivotal role in shaping the course of school desegregation in the United States. Through a series of landmark decisions, the Court established the legal framework for desegregation and defined the limits of federal intervention.

10.1 Key Supreme Court Cases

Some of the key Supreme Court cases related to school desegregation include:

• Brown v. Board of Education (1954): Declared state-sponsored segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
• Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971): Upheld the use of busing as a legitimate tool for desegregation.
• Milliken v. Bradley (1974): Limited the scope of desegregation efforts by prohibiting cross-district busing unless intentional discrimination was proven.
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007): Limited the use of race as a factor in assigning students to schools.

10.2 The Evolution of the Court’s Approach

The Supreme Court’s approach to school desegregation evolved over time, reflecting changes in the political and social landscape. In the early years of desegregation, the Court took a 적극적인 stance, ordering 적극적인 measures to dismantle dual school systems. In later years, the Court adopted a more restrained approach, emphasizing local control and individual choice.

10.3 The Ongoing Debate

The debate over school desegregation continues to this day, with ongoing discussions about the role of race in education, the effectiveness of various desegregation strategies, and the pursuit of equal educational opportunity for all students.

11. Free Response and AP Practice Questions

To further enhance your understanding of school desegregation, consider the following free response and AP practice questions:

11.1 Free Response Questions

1. Explain the reasons why courts ended up using busing plans to integrate public schools.
2. Describe the reasons for the declining popularity and phasing out of busing plans.

11.2 AP Practice Questions

“The scope of permissible transportation of students as an implement of a remedial decree has never been defined by this Court . . . No rigid guidelines as to student transportation can be given for application to the infinite variety of problems presented in thousands of situations. Bus transportation has been an integral part of the public education system for years, and was perhaps the single most important factor in the transition from the one-room schoolhouse to the consolidated school. . . .

The importance of bus transportation as a normal and accepted tool of educational policy is readily discernible in this and the companion case Davis, supra. The Charlotte school authorities did not purport to assign students on the basis of geographically drawn zones until 1965 and then they allowed almost unlimited transfer privileges. The District Court’s conclusion that assignment of children to the school nearest their home serving their grade would not produce an effective dismantling of the dual system is supported by the record.

Thus the remedial techniques used in the District Court’s order were within that court’s power to provide equitable relief; implementation of the decree is well within the capacity of the school authority.”

402 U.S. 1 Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, et al. (No. 281, 349) Argued: October 12, 1970 Decided: April 20, 1971

1. The Supreme Court case that influenced the ideas in the excerpt was
   1. Plessy v. Ferguson
   2. Brown v. Board of Education
   3. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
   4. Mapp v. Ohio
2. The sentiments expressed in the excerpt contributed most directly to
   1. the implementation of forced busing to achieve racial integration
   2. the provision of public transportation for public education
   3. guaranteed economic equality in public education
   4. the acceptance of Great Society values in all facets of society
3. The most significant context for the sentiments in the excerpt is
   1. civil rights
   2. gender equality
   3. immigration reform
   4. integrated transportation services

12. Key Figures in the Civil Rights Movement

The Civil Rights Movement was shaped by the contributions of numerous individuals who dedicated their lives to the fight for equality and justice. Understanding their roles and impact is crucial to appreciating the movement’s complexity and achievements.

12.1 Prominent Leaders

• Martin Luther King Jr.: A leader of the movement who advocated for nonviolent resistance.
• Rosa Parks: Her refusal to give up her seat on a bus sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott.
• Malcolm X: An activist who promoted Black empowerment and self-defense.
• Thurgood Marshall: The first African American Supreme Court justice.
• Medgar Evers: An activist assassinated for his work in Mississippi.
• John Lewis: A civil rights leader who participated in the Freedom Rides.

12.2 Grassroots Activists

Grassroots activists played a vital role in mobilizing communities, organizing protests, and advocating for change at the local level.

12.3 The Importance of Collective Action

The Civil Rights Movement was a collective effort, relying on the participation and dedication of countless individuals from all walks of life. Their courage, resilience, and commitment to justice helped transform American society and pave the way for a more equitable future.

13. Primary Sources and Further Research

To deepen your understanding of school desegregation and the Civil Rights Movement, consider exploring the following primary sources and suggested resources:

13.1 Primary Sources

• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) [https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/](https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/)
• Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974) [https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/717/](https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/717/)
• Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board. of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971) [https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/1/](https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/1/)
• “US History Since 1865 – Primary Source 3. The Southern Manifesto.” 1956 [https://historyprofessorjoe.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/201-Primary-Source-3-Southern-Manifesto-2.pdf](https://historyprofessorjoe.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/201-Primary-Source-3-Southern-Manifesto-2.pdf)

13.2 Suggested Resources

• Armor, David J. Forced Justice: School Desegregation and the Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
• Baugh, Joyce A. The Detroit School Busing Case: Milliken v. Bradley and the Controversy over Desegregation. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2011.
• Delmont, Matthew F. Why Busing Failed: Race, Media, and the National Resistance to School Desegregation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2016.
• Formisano, Ronald P. Boston Against Busing: Race, Class, and Ethnicity in the 1960s and 1970s. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1991.
• Patterson, James T. Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
• Smith, Stephen Samuel. Boom for Whom? Education, Desegregation and Development in Charlotte. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2004.

14. The Role of Media in Shaping Public Opinion

Media played a crucial role in shaping public opinion about the Civil Rights Movement, including the issue of school desegregation. Newspapers, television, and other media outlets provided coverage of events, disseminated information, and framed the narrative surrounding the movement.

14.1 Media Coverage of Key Events

Media coverage of events such as the Little Rock Crisis, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, and the March on Washington helped raise awareness of the Civil Rights Movement and galvanize public support.

14.2 Framing the Narrative

Media outlets often framed the narrative surrounding the Civil Rights Movement in ways that either supported or opposed the movement’s goals. Some media outlets portrayed civil rights activists as heroes and champions of justice, while others portrayed them as troublemakers and agitators.

14.3 The Impact of Visual Media

Visual media, such as television and photographs, had a particularly powerful impact on public opinion. Images of police brutality against civil rights protesters and scenes of school desegregation sparked outrage and sympathy among many Americans.

15. The Importance of Historical Context

To fully understand the complexities of school desegregation and the Civil Rights Movement, it’s essential to consider the historical context in which these events unfolded.

15.1 The Legacy of Slavery and Reconstruction

The legacy of slavery and Reconstruction had a profound impact on race relations in the United States. The Jim Crow laws and other discriminatory practices that emerged in the aftermath of Reconstruction perpetuated systemic inequality and discrimination against Black Americans.

15.2 The Cold War

The Cold War also played a role in shaping the Civil Rights Movement. The United States sought to portray itself as a beacon of democracy and freedom in contrast to the Soviet Union’s authoritarian regime. However, the existence of racial segregation and discrimination in the United States undermined its credibility on the world stage.

15.3 The Rise of the Civil Rights Movement

The rise of the Civil Rights Movement was a response to the persistent inequality and discrimination faced by Black Americans. The movement sought to dismantle segregation, secure voting rights, and promote economic opportunity.

16. Contemporary Relevance

The issues of school desegregation and educational equity remain relevant today. While significant progress has been made in dismantling legal segregation, racial disparities in education persist.

16.1 Resegregation

In recent years, some schools have become increasingly resegregated, with higher concentrations of students from minority groups and low-income families.

16.2 Achievement Gaps

Achievement gaps between white students and students from minority groups persist, highlighting the need for continued efforts to address educational inequality.

16.3 The Importance of Diversity

Many educators and policymakers recognize the importance of diversity in schools, arguing that it promotes understanding, empathy, and critical thinking skills.

17. Understanding Civil Rights Expansion

The Civil Rights Movement was a period of significant expansion of civil rights, extending beyond the African American community to include other marginalized groups. Understanding this expansion requires examining the diverse movements that emerged during this era and their interconnectedness.

17.1 Latinx Civil Rights

The Latinx community fought for equal rights, addressing issues such as immigration, language access, and discrimination. The Chicano Movement, a key component of this struggle, advocated for cultural pride, political empowerment, and social justice.

17.2 LGBTQ+ Rights

The LGBTQ+ rights movement gained momentum during the 1960s and 1970s, challenging discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Stonewall Riots in 1969 marked a turning point, igniting a new wave of activism and advocacy.

17.3 Women’s Rights

The women’s rights movement sought to achieve gender equality in all aspects of life, including education, employment, and reproductive rights. The movement advocated for equal pay, access to contraception, and an end to gender-based discrimination.

17.4 American Indian Movement

The American Indian Movement (AIM) fought for the rights and sovereignty of Native American tribes. AIM advocated for treaty rights, cultural preservation, and an end to discrimination and poverty.

18. Activism Comparison

Comparing the activism strategies employed by different civil rights movements reveals both commonalities and distinctions. Understanding these similarities and differences provides insights into the diverse approaches used to challenge inequality and injustice.

18.1 Nonviolent Resistance

Nonviolent resistance, inspired by the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi, was a key strategy employed by the African American Civil Rights Movement. This approach involved using peaceful protests, boycotts, and civil disobedience to challenge discriminatory laws and practices.

18.2 Legal Challenges

Legal challenges played a crucial role in advancing civil rights for various groups. Organizations such as the NAACP and the ACLU filed lawsuits to challenge discriminatory laws and policies in court.

18.3 Political Advocacy

Political advocacy involved lobbying elected officials, organizing voter registration drives, and advocating for legislation that would protect civil rights.

18.4 Direct Action

Direct action tactics, such as sit-ins, freedom rides, and protest marches, were used to confront discrimination directly and raise awareness of civil rights issues.

19. Analysis Perspective

Analyzing the Civil Rights Movement from multiple perspectives provides a more comprehensive understanding of its complexities and legacies. This involves considering the experiences of different groups, examining the role of power and privilege, and critically evaluating the impact of the movement on American society.

19.1 Intersectionality

Intersectionality recognizes that individuals can experience multiple forms of oppression based on their race, gender, sexual orientation, and other identities. Understanding intersectionality is crucial to addressing the complex challenges faced by marginalized groups.

19.2 Power and Privilege

Examining the role of power and privilege helps to illuminate the systemic barriers that perpetuate inequality. Understanding how power operates is essential to challenging discrimination and promoting social justice.

19.3 The Legacy of the Movement

The Civil Rights Movement had a transformative impact on American society, dismantling legal segregation, expanding voting rights, and promoting greater equality and inclusion. However, the struggle for civil rights continues, as persistent inequalities and injustices remain.

20. Conclusion: Comparing Essay and Video Insights

Comparing essays and videos on the Civil Rights Movement reveals distinct approaches to conveying information and perspectives. Essays offer in-depth analysis and critical examination, while videos provide a visual and auditory experience that can evoke emotions and create a sense of immediacy. Both mediums contribute to a deeper understanding of the Civil Rights Movement and its ongoing relevance.

20.1 Choosing the Right Source

Whether to engage with an essay or a video depends on individual learning preferences and research goals. Essays are ideal for in-depth study and critical analysis, while videos offer a more accessible and engaging introduction to the topic.

20.2 The Value of Multiple Perspectives

Engaging with multiple sources, including both essays and videos, provides a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the Civil Rights Movement. By considering diverse perspectives and examining a variety of evidence, individuals can develop a deeper appreciation for the complexities and legacies of this pivotal era in American history.

At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we strive to provide objective comparisons to aid informed decision-making. The Civil Rights Movement’s impact is profound, and understanding its various facets requires diverse sources.

Still unsure which sources to trust for your research needs? Visit compare.edu.vn today for detailed comparisons and expert insights. Make informed decisions with confidence. Contact us at 333 Comparison Plaza, Choice City, CA 90210, United States. Whatsapp: +1 (626) 555-9090.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What was the significance of Brown v. Board of Education?
   Brown v. Board of Education declared state-sponsored segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the “separate but equal” doctrine.

2. What was the Southern Manifesto?
   The Southern Manifesto was a document signed by over 100 members of Congress opposing the Brown decision and pledging to resist desegregation.

3. What was “massive resistance”?
   “Massive resistance” referred to the strategies used by white southerners to resist desegregation, including closing public schools and creating private schools.

4. What was the Little Rock Crisis?
   The Little Rock Crisis occurred when nine Black students attempted to enroll at Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, and were met with resistance from the governor and local whites.

5. What was busing and why was it controversial?
   Busing involved transporting students to achieve racial balance in schools. It was controversial due to concerns about safety, academic quality, and the burden placed on students.

6. What was the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education decision?
   The Swann decision upheld the use of busing as a legitimate tool for desegregation.

7. What was the Milliken v. Bradley decision?
   The Milliken decision limited the scope of desegregation efforts by prohibiting cross-district busing unless intentional discrimination was proven.

8. What is school choice and what are its pros and cons?
   School choice allows parents to select the school that best meets their children’s needs. Pros include empowerment and competition, while cons include resource diversion and segregation.

9. How did segregation differ in the North and South?
   In the South, segregation was de jure (by law), while in the North, it was often de facto (in practice).

10. What was the Racial Imbalance Act?
    The Racial Imbalance Act, enacted in Massachusetts in 1965, aimed to address racial imbalances in public schools by declaring schools with over 50% nonwhite students as racially imbalanced.