The idiom “comparing apples and oranges” is often used to suggest that two things are so fundamentally different that they cannot be compared. But is this really true? This article delves into the meaning and origins of the phrase, exploring why it’s often misused and how embracing comparisons, even between seemingly dissimilar things, can foster creativity and innovation.
The Common Interpretation
The common interpretation of “comparing apples and oranges” implies a futile exercise. It suggests that the items in question are so disparate in their nature, characteristics, or purpose that any attempt to compare them is meaningless. This interpretation often shuts down further discussion and discourages critical thinking.
Debunking the Myth: Apples and Oranges Are More Similar Than You Think
Contrary to popular belief, apples and oranges share many similarities. They’re both fruits, roughly the same size and shape, grow on trees, and offer nutritional value. Even scientifically, their composition is more alike than different, as demonstrated by a humorous study published in Improbable Research using infrared spectrometry.
Why We Resist Comparing Dissimilar Things
The idiom persists because we tend to gravitate towards comparing like with like. In our professional and personal lives, we often seek validation and inspiration from those within our immediate circles or industries, limiting our exposure to diverse perspectives. This inherent bias hinders innovation and prevents us from recognizing valuable connections between seemingly unrelated fields.
The Power of Combinatory Play: Finding Similarities in the Dissimilar
True breakthroughs often arise from recognizing similarities in seemingly disparate things. This concept, known as “combinatory play,” has been championed by prominent figures like Albert Einstein and Steve Jobs. It involves drawing inspiration from diverse fields and combining seemingly unrelated ideas to generate novel solutions and creative outputs.
Examples of Cross-Pollination in Action
History is replete with examples of how cross-pollination of ideas has led to groundbreaking innovations:
- Einstein: Used music to unlock scientific insights.
- Jobs: Drew inspiration from calligraphy to revolutionize computer typography.
- Da Vinci: Found inspiration in nature for both art and engineering.
- Google’s Founders: Applied academic citation principles to create a revolutionary search engine.
- Darwin: Combined economic principles with biological observations to develop the theory of evolution.
- Gutenberg: Adapted wine press technology to invent the printing press.
Even in music, artists like Iron Maiden and David Bowie have demonstrated the power of combining disparate influences to create unique and impactful art.
Embracing the “Apples and Oranges” Comparison
Instead of dismissing comparisons between seemingly different things, we should embrace them. By venturing outside our comfort zones and exploring diverse fields, we can unlock new possibilities and foster innovation.
Conclusion
The phrase “comparing apples and oranges” often serves as a barrier to creative thinking. However, by recognizing the inherent similarities in seemingly different things and embracing the power of combinatory play, we can unlock groundbreaking insights and foster true innovation. So, the next time someone accuses you of comparing apples and oranges, consider it a compliment. It means you’re thinking outside the box and exploring the potential for connections that others might miss.
