Both the Russell 1000 Index and the S&P 500 (Standard & Poor’s 500 Index) stand as prominent benchmarks for the performance of large-cap stocks in the United States. Investors and financial analysts frequently turn to these indices to gauge the overall health and direction of the U.S. stock market, as they are designed to reflect the strength of the nation’s most substantial companies. While both indices serve a similar purpose and are often mentioned in the same breath, it’s crucial to understand the subtle yet significant distinctions between the Russell 1000 Index Compare and the S&P 500. These differences lie in their composition methodologies, eligibility criteria for component stocks, and rebalancing schedules, which can lead to varying perceptions of volatility and market representation.
Understanding the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 Indices
The S&P 500 is arguably the most widely recognized benchmark of large-cap U.S. equities. Originating in 1923 and evolving into its current form by 1957, the S&P 500 comprises 500 leading large-cap companies publicly traded in the U.S. stock market. Its primary objective is to accurately measure the market capitalization-weighted performance of these U.S. stocks listed on major exchanges. Due to its broad acceptance and historical significance, the S&P 500 acts as the underlying benchmark for a vast array of investment vehicles, including mutual funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), making it a cornerstone of portfolio strategy for countless investors.
The Russell 1000 Index, while not as universally recognized as the S&P 500, is another critical gauge of the large-cap segment of the U.S. equity market. Launched in 1984 by FTSE Russell, this index is a subset of the comprehensive Russell 3000 Index, which encapsulates 3,000 of the largest U.S.-listed stocks. The Russell U.S. indices family collectively represents approximately 99% of the total U.S. equity market capitalization. Within this family, the Russell 1000 focuses on the top 1,000 largest companies, accounting for about 93% of the total U.S. equity market. The remaining 2,000 smaller companies within the Russell 3000 constitute the Russell 2000 index, which is well-known as a benchmark for small-cap stocks.
A key difference immediately becomes apparent when considering the scale of each index: the S&P 500 includes 500 stocks, whereas the Russell 1000, as its name suggests, includes approximately 1,000. This numerical divergence translates into a difference in composition. While the S&P 500 is strictly focused on large-cap stocks, the Russell 1000, in its pursuit of broader market representation within the top tier, incorporates some mid-cap stocks to complete its constituent list. This inclusion of mid-cap companies is a subtle but important factor when we russell 1000 index compare with the S&P 500.
Eligibility Requirements: How Stocks Are Selected
Both the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 indices employ specific methodologies to determine which companies are eligible for inclusion. Both indices start with the fundamental criterion of being a “U.S. company,” considering factors such as the company’s headquarters location, revenue sources, and the geographical distribution of its assets. Furthermore, stocks must be actively traded on either the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or the Nasdaq to qualify for either index.
S&P 500 Eligibility Criteria
S&P Dow Jones Indices, the administrator of the S&P 500, establishes eligibility based on a Total Market Index and ranks potential constituents by their float-adjusted market capitalization. Market capitalization, a measure of a company’s total value, is calculated by multiplying the number of outstanding shares by the current stock price.
For a company to be considered for the S&P 500, it generally needs to have a market capitalization of $12.7 billion or greater. As of February 2023, the median market cap within the S&P 500 was around $31.71 billion, representing approximately 80% of the total U.S. equity market. Beyond market cap, profitability is also a factor. Typically, companies must demonstrate positive aggregate net income over the sum of the last four consecutive quarters, including the most recent quarter, although this requirement can vary slightly depending on the specific S&P index.
The final selection of the 500 companies for the S&P 500 is determined by a committee of in-house professionals at S&P Dow Jones Indices. This committee meets monthly, and their decisions regarding index inclusions are kept confidential. Importantly, the committee’s choices are not strictly rule-based and may not always align perfectly with a simple ranking of the top 500 eligible stocks by market capitalization, allowing for a degree of subjective judgment in the composition of the index.
Russell 1000 Eligibility Criteria
In contrast to the committee-driven approach of the S&P 500, FTSE Russell utilizes a more rules-based methodology for constructing the Russell 1000. The starting universe for the Russell indices is the Russell 3000E, which includes the 4,000 largest U.S.-listed stocks by total market capitalization, representing a broader segment of the equity market. These 4,000 stocks are then ranked in descending order of their total market capitalization. The top 1,000 stocks from this ranking are automatically included in the Russell 1000 Index.
While primarily rule-based, there are some nuanced rules applied for stocks near the inclusion threshold, which might result in the index containing slightly more or fewer than exactly 1,000 stocks. Generally, companies with a market capitalization below $30 million are not eligible for inclusion in any of the Russell U.S. indices.
As of January 31, 2023, the Russell 1000 had an average market cap of approximately $416.33 billion and a median market cap of $13.2 billion. The median market cap figure highlights the inclusion of mid-cap stocks within the Russell 1000, which is a key differentiator when we russell 1000 index compare it to the S&P 500, which is purely large-cap. Mid-cap stocks are generally considered to have a higher growth potential but also come with a higher risk profile. Consequently, the Russell 1000 Index is often perceived as slightly more volatile than the S&P 500 due to this blend of large and mid-cap constituents.
Index Rebalancing: Maintaining Market Relevance
Given the dynamic nature of the stock market, where company valuations fluctuate daily, index administrators must periodically adjust index compositions to accurately reflect current market conditions. This process of adjusting the weights and constituents of an index is known as rebalancing. However, the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 follow different schedules for their rebalancing activities.
S&P 500 Rebalancing Schedule
The S&P 500 undergoes quarterly rebalancing to adjust the weights of its components and is reconstituted annually to refresh its list of constituents. Additionally, the S&P 500 committee retains the flexibility to make ad-hoc changes to the index composition at any point following their monthly meetings, allowing for timely adjustments in response to significant corporate events or market shifts.
Russell 1000 Rebalancing Schedule
The Russell 1000 undergoes a full reconstitution once a year, typically at the end of the second quarter. During this annual reconstitution, the index membership is completely reviewed and updated based on the latest market capitalization rankings. Between annual reconstitutions, the Russell 1000 also incorporates quarterly updates to account for additions from Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) and changes in company float. The frequency of index updates and rebalancing can influence the tracking accuracy and potential performance differences of mutual funds and ETFs that benchmark themselves against these market averages.
Performance and Volatility: Are Differences Evident?
Despite the structural and methodological differences in construction and eligibility between the S&P 500 and Russell 1000, their performance and volatility metrics exhibit a remarkable degree of similarity. The correlation between these two indices over extended periods has been demonstrably high.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/SPYvsIWB5-64d9d9c84fb749b6bc3715a3b0d36f62.jpg)
Comparison of dividend-adjusted returns for SPY (S&P 500 ETF) vs IWB (Russell 1000 ETF) over a 20-year period, demonstrating highly correlated performance.
As illustrated in the chart, the dividend-adjusted performance of the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 has been strikingly similar over a 20-year span, with a correlation exceeding 94%. This strong correlation suggests that while the indices have distinct compositions and selection processes, they ultimately capture very similar segments of the U.S. stock market and reflect similar overall market trends.
In conclusion, when we russell 1000 index compare against the S&P 500, we find that both are vital indicators of large-cap U.S. stock performance. The S&P 500, with its stricter large-cap focus and committee-based selection, is often viewed as the quintessential benchmark. The Russell 1000, with its broader reach into the upper echelons of the market including some mid-caps and rules-based methodology, offers a slightly more expansive view. However, in practical terms, for investors looking to benchmark or gain exposure to the large-cap U.S. equity market, both the S&P 500 and the Russell 1000 serve as highly correlated and effective tools.
