Background: Penile constriction devices are a non-surgical option for men seeking to improve their sexual experiences. With an increasing number of these devices available, understanding their differences in terms of user preference and effectiveness is essential for guiding individuals in their choices.
Aim: This article compares two medical-grade penile constriction devices, Eddie by Giddy and FirmTech, based on user preferences and reported effectiveness from a recent study.
Methods: A study was conducted between May and July 2023, involving men recruited through social media. Participants were part of a randomized study where they tried both Eddie and FirmTech devices. They used each device twice over two weeks during either masturbation or sexual intercourse. After using each device, participants filled out a questionnaire about their satisfaction, where lower scores indicated better satisfaction. Statistical analysis was used to compare the results for both devices.
Outcomes: The study primarily looked at user-reported satisfaction and device effectiveness. Secondarily, it aimed to determine device preference among men with and without erectile dysfunction (ED).
Results: Fifty men participated, with 49 completing the study. The average age of participants was 40. A significant 80% of participants would recommend the FirmTech device, compared to 53% for Eddie by Giddy (P = 0.0026). FirmTech was reported to be easier to put on when the penis was both flaccid and erect (P = 0.0308 and 0.0002, respectively). Users also found FirmTech more comfortable, with better stretch and adjustability (P = 0.087, <0.0001, and 0.0119, respectively). Overall, participants had a more positive impression of the FirmTech device (P = 0.0249). Interestingly, Eddie by Giddy was perceived to improve erectile firmness more effectively in men with ED compared to those without ED (P = 0.0178).
Clinical Implications: This research contributes valuable information to the existing knowledge on penile constriction devices. It can assist healthcare providers in advising patients on selecting devices to enhance their sexual function based on individual needs and preferences.
Strengths and Limitations: The study’s strengths include its prospective randomized crossover design. However, limitations include it being a single-center study relying on patient-reported outcomes, which can be subjective.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the FirmTech device outperformed Eddie by Giddy in terms of overall user impression, likelihood of future use, and recommendation to others. FirmTech was generally preferred for its ease of use and comfort. However, Eddie by Giddy showed a potential advantage in improving erectile firmness, particularly for individuals experiencing erectile dysfunction. Choosing between penis devices like Eddie and FirmTech depends largely on individual priorities, whether it’s overall comfort and ease of use or a focus on enhancing erection firmness.
Clinical trial registration number: NCT05853822.
