In personal injury law, comparative negligence is a crucial principle that determines how fault is assigned and damages are awarded when more than one party is negligent in an incident. It’s a departure from older legal doctrines and offers a more nuanced approach to compensation. Instead of completely barring recovery for a plaintiff who is even slightly at fault, comparative negligence seeks to proportionally reduce the damages a plaintiff can recover based on their degree of responsibility for the incident. Within comparative negligence, Modified Comparative Negligence represents a significant variation, establishing thresholds that impact a plaintiff’s ability to recover damages.
What is Modified Comparative Negligence?
Modified comparative negligence is a legal standard applied in many jurisdictions to resolve personal injury claims where the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to their injuries. It acknowledges that in many accidents, fault is not always black and white, and injured parties may bear some responsibility. Unlike pure comparative negligence, which allows a plaintiff to recover damages even if they are 99% at fault (albeit reduced by their percentage of fault), modified comparative negligence sets a limit on the plaintiff’s fault. If the plaintiff’s negligence exceeds this limit, their ability to recover damages is completely barred or significantly restricted.
There are two primary types of modified comparative negligence, each with a slightly different threshold: the 50 percent bar rule and the 51 percent bar rule. These rules dictate the maximum percentage of fault a plaintiff can bear and still recover damages.
50 Percent Bar Rule
Under the 50 percent bar rule, a plaintiff can recover damages only if their fault is determined to be less than 50%. If a court or jury finds that the plaintiff is 50% or more at fault for the incident, they are barred from recovering any damages from the other negligent parties. For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 49% at fault, they can still recover damages, but those damages will be reduced by their 49% share of the negligence. However, if they are found to be 50% at fault, or more, they recover nothing.
51 Percent Bar Rule
The 51 percent bar rule is slightly more lenient than the 50 percent rule. In jurisdictions following the 51 percent rule, a plaintiff can recover damages as long as their fault is 50% or less. This means a plaintiff can be found equally at fault (50%) and still recover a portion of their damages. However, if their fault is determined to be 51% or greater, they are barred from recovery. Therefore, in a 51 percent bar rule state, a plaintiff who is 50% at fault can still recover 50% of their damages, while a plaintiff 51% at fault cannot recover anything.
Modified Comparative Negligence Compared to Other Negligence Rules
Understanding modified comparative negligence requires distinguishing it from other negligence standards, particularly pure comparative negligence and contributory negligence.
-
Pure Comparative Negligence: As mentioned earlier, pure comparative negligence allows for damage recovery regardless of the plaintiff’s fault percentage, simply reducing the award by that percentage. This system is more plaintiff-friendly than modified comparative negligence, as it permits recovery even when the plaintiff is predominantly at fault.
-
Contributory Negligence: In stark contrast to both forms of comparative negligence, contributory negligence is a much harsher rule. Under contributory negligence, if a plaintiff is found to be even 1% at fault, they are completely barred from recovering any damages. This system is very defendant-friendly and is only followed in a handful of jurisdictions in the United States.
Modified comparative negligence represents a middle ground between these two extremes. It acknowledges the plaintiff’s potential role in causing their injuries, but it also recognizes that barring recovery entirely for slight negligence can be unfair. By setting a specific fault threshold (50% or 51%), modified comparative negligence aims to balance the principles of personal responsibility and fair compensation in negligence cases. The specific rule in place (50% or 51% bar) and the overall adoption of modified comparative negligence vary significantly by state, making it essential to understand the laws of the relevant jurisdiction when dealing with a personal injury claim.
