Comparing handwriting samples to determine authorship is a complex process requiring careful observation and analysis. While this guide outlines the methodology, it’s crucial to understand that it won’t instantly transform you into a handwriting expert. Becoming proficient requires extensive training and experience.
Distinguishing Features: A Balancing Act
The core of handwriting comparison lies in identifying distinguishing features present in both samples while ensuring no significant differences exist. This involves a delicate balance: solely focusing on similarities increases the risk of false matches, while excessive scrutiny of minor, inevitable differences can lead to overlooking genuine matches.
Individual vs. Style Characteristics
Handwriting analysis relies on differentiating between two primary characteristic types:
- Individual Characteristics: Unique traits specific to a particular writer, holding evidential value.
- Style Characteristics: Non-unique traits shared by multiple writers, categorized into:
- System Characteristics: Broad stylistic elements, like historical writing systems.
- Copybook Characteristics: Traits learned from specific writing manuals.
- Underground Characteristics: Shared traits not found in copybooks, often evolving organically.
For a deeper understanding of how style characteristics develop in contemporary British handwriting, refer to Tom Davis’s article, Handwriting Acquisition in the UK. The initial step in analysis is separating these individual characteristics, which carry weight as evidence, from the less informative style characteristics.
The Challenge of Identifying Individual Characteristics
Accurately distinguishing individual from style characteristics is paramount, as shared traits don’t definitively link documents to a single author. This task becomes particularly difficult when dealing with historical handwriting due to limited supporting evidence about teaching methods and the prevalence of professional, standardized handwriting styles.
The Handwriting Comparison Process
Comparing handwriting involves several key steps:
-
Sample Selection: Choose samples similar in date, formality, and ideally, substantial in length for a more thorough comparison. Limited sample size significantly hinders accurate analysis.
-
Analysis: Examine each sample independently for unique individual characteristics.
-
Comparison: Systematically compare samples for recurring individual characteristics in non-adjacent text sections. A few shared striking features are insufficient; the comparison requires consistent, unique similarities and the absence of significant differences. Professionals prioritize seeking evidence of different authorship, while non-professionals often focus on similarities first, potentially leading to premature conclusions.
Understanding Variation and Context
Individual handwriting inherently varies due to factors like letter position, neighboring letters, and external influences such as the writer’s health, writing surface, and time constraints. Analyzing all instances of a letter within a sample, rather than isolated instances, helps reveal the underlying writing structure.
Beyond Letterforms: A Deeper Look
While letterforms provide a convenient starting point, professional analysis delves into the physical act of writing, recognizing each pen stroke as a movement trace. Understanding the motor actions behind the writing is crucial for accurate identification.
Key characteristics beyond letterforms include:
- Relative height and width of letters.
- Connecting strokes.
- Handwriting slant.
- Spacing patterns, including indentation and margins.
- Punctuation and symbol formation.
- Pen-lifts and their regularity.
- Line quality, influenced by writing speed and potential tremor in forgeries.
- Shading variations reflecting writing pressure.
Forensic vs. Scholarly Analysis
Handwriting analysis draws heavily from forensic science. While both fields utilize similar techniques, there are distinctions in their applications and objectives. Further exploration of forensic handwriting analysis can illuminate these differences.
