DeepSeek, a Chinese AI application, has rapidly gained prominence, prompting discussions about its performance compared to established players like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. This article delves into a comparative analysis of DeepSeek and ChatGPT across various tasks, including writing assistance, coding, brainstorming, and learning & research.
DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Writing Assistance
Both DeepSeek and ChatGPT excel at providing writing assistance. When tasked with summarizing the best Scottish football players and drafting a blog post, both models delivered comprehensive lists and well-written summaries. DeepSeek’s response was faster, including a ranked list with brief descriptions of players’ achievements. ChatGPT provided a similar list and a detailed blog post with a concluding statement.
DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Coding Capabilities
For coding tasks, DeepSeek has demonstrated impressive capabilities. An AI researcher at Samsung Medical Center reported that DeepSeek successfully solved a complex coding problem that even ChatGPT’s advanced model (o1) couldn’t resolve. Furthermore, industry experts like Addy Osmani, Head of Chrome Developer Experience at Google, highlight the effectiveness of combining DeepSeek with other AI models like Claude Sonnet for enhanced coding performance. DeepSeek’s cost-effectiveness compared to ChatGPT and Claude Sonnet also makes it an attractive option for developers.
DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Brainstorming Ideas
In a brainstorming exercise involving generating children’s story ideas about a boy living on the moon, ChatGPT provided six concise ideas, each offering a different narrative premise. DeepSeek, however, generated a single, fully developed story, albeit a simple one. This suggests that ChatGPT might be more suitable for generating diverse ideas, while DeepSeek leans towards developing a single concept into a complete narrative.
DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Learning and Research
When tasked with explaining the complex historical context of World War I, both ChatGPT and DeepSeek provided accurate summaries. ChatGPT’s response was more detailed, outlining key factors and events leading up to the war. DeepSeek offered a briefer overview, covering the main points. Google’s Gemini provided a similar synopsis with links to reputable historical sources.
Conclusion
DeepSeek’s performance across various tasks demonstrates its competitiveness against established AI models like ChatGPT. While ChatGPT excels in providing detailed responses and diverse brainstorming ideas, DeepSeek showcases strengths in speed, coding problem-solving, and cost-effectiveness. The emergence of DeepSeek signals a dynamic AI landscape where innovation continues to evolve. The “AI race” is far from over, and DeepSeek’s emergence suggests significant potential for future advancements in the field.
