A Reddit user created a map comparing the size of U.S. states to countries with similar land areas. Surprisingly, Pennsylvania is about the same size as Rwanda. But how does a small, densely populated East African nation compare to the vast expanse of Texas? Let’s explore the significant size difference between these two regions.
Rwanda, located in East Africa, is known for its stunning landscapes and tragic history. It covers a relatively small area of approximately 10,168 square miles. In contrast, Texas, the second-largest U.S. state, boasts a massive 268,596 square miles. This stark difference in size becomes readily apparent when comparing the two: Texas is roughly 26 times larger than Rwanda.
To visualize this disparity, imagine overlaying a map of Rwanda onto a map of Texas. You could fit Rwanda within Texas multiple times, with plenty of room to spare. The sheer scale of Texas highlights the vastness of the Lone Star State compared to the considerably smaller African nation.
While population isn’t directly related to land area, it offers another interesting point of comparison. Texas has a population exceeding 29 million, while Rwanda’s population is around 13 million. Despite its smaller size, Rwanda has a higher population density, meaning more people live within each square mile compared to Texas.
The map created by Reddit user Landmarker1YT allows for fascinating comparisons between U.S. states and countries worldwide. It underscores the diversity in size and population across different geographic regions. While Pennsylvania’s size comparison to Rwanda is noteworthy, the difference between Texas and Rwanda truly emphasizes the vastness of the Lone Star State.
Map compares state sizes to countries A map comparing the size of US states to countries worldwide, highlighting the vast differences in land area.
