The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fuel economy labels are designed to help consumers make informed decisions when purchasing new vehicles. But how well do these labels reflect real-world miles per gallon (MPG)? Consumer Reports investigated the accuracy of EPA MPG estimates in both 2005 and 2016, comparing EPA figures to their own rigorous road tests.
In 2005, Consumer Reports analyzed data from 303 vehicles (model years 2000-2006) and found a significant discrepancy. Their tests revealed that 90% of the 274 vehicles tested achieved lower fuel economy than the EPA label indicated. The average difference was a notable 3.3 MPG, or 10.3 percent less than expected. This raised concerns about the reliability of EPA MPG ratings for consumers.
EPA MPG ratings compared to real-world fuel economy as tested by Consumer Reports
Recognizing these issues, the EPA updated its testing methods in 2008 to better reflect real-world driving conditions. These changes incorporated factors like faster speeds, quicker acceleration, air conditioning usage, and colder temperatures. To assess the impact of these updates, Consumer Reports conducted a follow-up study in 2016. This new analysis examined 397 vehicles tested by CR from model years 2009 to 2016. Additionally, it incorporated data from over one million Consumer Reports members who answered questions about their vehicles’ fuel efficiency in a 2015 survey.
The 2016 Consumer Reports analysis revealed a positive shift. The gap between EPA labels and CR’s test results had narrowed significantly. Overall, the study found no statistically significant difference between Consumer Reports’ test results and the EPA estimates. While 57% of the tested vehicles still showed lower fuel economy than the EPA label, the average difference was reduced to approximately 3.1% or just 0.8 MPG. Importantly, over 80% of these vehicles were within 1 MPG of the EPA estimates. This indicated a considerable improvement in the accuracy of EPA MPG labels compared to the 2005 findings.
However, the accuracy of EPA labels still varies depending on engine type. Consumer Reports’ testing showed that conventional gasoline engines were, on average, about 0.7 MPG less efficient than the EPA label suggested. Conversely, diesel engines tended to be slightly more efficient, averaging about 0.7 MPG better than the EPA label. Hybrid engines presented a more complex picture. Even in the 2016 analysis, the average difference between EPA labels and Consumer Reports tests for hybrids remained relatively high at approximately 3.3 MPG (9.1%). Despite this, data from Consumer Reports’ surveys indicated that hybrid owners reported fuel efficiency figures more closely aligned with EPA estimates.
In conclusion, Consumer Reports’ 2016 analysis demonstrates that the EPA’s updated fuel economy labels are significantly more accurate and reliable than they were in the early 2000s. While some variation persists, particularly with hybrid engines, the overall MPG estimates provided by the EPA now much better reflect real-world fuel economy, providing consumers with more trustworthy information for their car purchasing decisions.
Learn More:
