Navigating the nuances of English grammar is crucial for excelling in the GMAT sentence correction section. Among the subtle yet significant grammatical points, understanding the correct usage of “compared to” and “compared with” stands out. These phrases, both serving to draw comparisons, are deployed in distinct contexts. Recognizing this difference is not just about grammar; it’s about precision in communication, a skill highly valued on the GMAT and beyond. This article aims to clarify the distinction between “compared to” and “compared with”, equipping you with the knowledge to tackle GMAT sentence correction questions effectively.
Dissecting the Difference: “Compared With” for Similarities, “Compared To” for Differences
While both phrases signal a comparison, the key to their correct application lies in the nature of the items being compared. “Compared with” is employed when drawing comparisons between items of a similar nature, highlighting both similarities and differences within the same category. Conversely, “compared to” is used when likening dissimilar items, often to illustrate a point through analogy or to emphasize a stark contrast between different categories.
Let’s examine clear examples to solidify this concept:
Example 1: “Compared with” – Highlighting Variations Within Similar Groups
Compared with the previous quarter, the company’s profits showed a significant increase.
Here, we are comparing two sets of data – profits from different quarters – both belonging to the same category (company profits over time). “Compared with” is apt because we are analyzing variations and trends within the similar context of financial performance.
Example 2: “Compared to” – Illustrating Differences Between Distinct Categories
The internet, compared to a vast library, offers instant access to information.
In this case, the internet and a library are fundamentally different entities. We use “compared to” to draw an analogy, likening the internet’s extensive information access to the vastness of a library. The aim is not to compare them as similar items but to use the familiar concept of a library to describe the scale of information available online.
It’s important to note that while these examples are straightforward, GMAT sentence correction questions might present more complex scenarios. The core principle remains: “compared with” for similar items, focusing on detailed comparison within a category, and “compared to” for dissimilar items, often used for analogy or highlighting stark differences across categories.
Mastering this distinction is a valuable tool in your GMAT preparation. For a more in-depth exploration of sentence correction nuances and strategies, consider exploring comprehensive GMAT preparation resources. Understanding the subtle power of words like “compared with” and “compared to” will not only enhance your GMAT score but also sharpen your overall communication skills.
