Understanding tractor economy is crucial for enthusiasts, collectors, and anyone interested in the evolution of agricultural machinery. While modern metrics focus on fuel efficiency and operational costs, examining historical data provides a unique perspective on how tractor design and performance have changed over time. This analysis delves into a fascinating dataset that ranks tractors based on an “economy” metric, offering a comparable view across different eras and manufacturers.
Deciphering the “Economy” Metric: What Are We Comparing?
The term “economy” in this context likely represents a calculated value that attempts to quantify the efficiency or cost-effectiveness of a tractor relative to its horsepower and operational capabilities of its time. It’s important to note that this metric is not explicitly defined in the original data, making direct comparisons to modern fuel efficiency standards challenging. However, by analyzing the provided “Economy Year Model Tractor Hp” data, we can infer that a lower “Economy” number potentially indicates a more economical tractor within this historical context. This could factor in fuel consumption relative to power output, purchase price for the era, or a combination of factors deemed relevant at the time of assessment.
It is crucial to approach this “economy” ranking as a comparable index rather than an absolute measure of modern economic efficiency. The data spans several decades, from the early days of tractor development to models from the 1980s. Therefore, the “economy” of a 1930s Caterpillar should be understood relative to other tractors of the 1930s, and similarly for 1970s Steiger models within their respective era.
Top Tractors by “Economy” Index: A Comparative List
Below is the data table, re-organized for clarity and optimized for readability, showcasing tractors ranked by their “Economy” index. This allows for direct comparable analysis of different models and manufacturers.
Economy | Year | Model | Tractor HP |
---|---|---|---|
9.29 | 1959 | Case 610 | 38.58 |
9.3 | 1978 | Steiger Panther III PT_350 | 105.86 |
9.49 | 1978 | Steiger Bearcat III PT_225 | 105.69 |
9.56 | 1978 | Steiger Cougar III PT_270 | 105.68 |
9.65 | 1978 | Ford FW_30 Diesel | 105.31 |
10.72 | 1936 | Caterpillar Diesel RD_7 | 95.97 |
10.96 | 1949 | Intercontinental D_26 (DE) | 28.86 |
11.02 | 1948 | Allis_Chalmers HD19 | 129.08 |
11.48 | 1956 | Allis_Chalmers HD_6B | 60.51 |
11.58 | 1958 | Oliver OC_4 | 26.08 |
11.72 | 1955 | Oliver OC_12 | 56.55 |
11.73 | 1980 | Satoh Mitsubishi Stallion S750 | 33.45 |
11.93 | 1961 | John Deere 1010 RU | 35.99 |
11.97 | 1980 | White_Iseki 2_30 | 28.33 |
12.17 | 1937 | Cletrac BD | 41.97 |
12.21 | 1967 | Farmall 656 Hydro | 66.06 |
12.28 | 1960 | International T_5 | 36.01 |
12.3 | 1955 | Caterpillar D_2 | 41.86 |
12.31 | 1949 | Farmaster FD_33 | 23.59 |
12.32 | 1973 | International Hydra 70 | 69.51 |
12.35 | 1966 | Oliver 1550 | 53.5 |
12.37 | 1937 | Allis_Chalmers 5_0 | 74.82 |
12.43 | 1979 | Ford 1900 | 26.88 |
12.46 | 1937 | Allis_Chalmers L_O | 91.56 |
12.48 | 1957 | Mercedes_Benz Unimog 30 | 28.43 |
12.49 | 1956 | Caterpillar D_7 | 121.7 |
12.6 | 1958 | Oliver 995 GM Lugmatic | 85.37 |
12.61 | 1980 | White_Iseki 2_35 | 32.84 |
12.61 | 1984 | Ford 1910 (12×4) Synchro | 28.52 |
12.64 | 1983 | Ford 1710 (12×4) Synchro | 23.79 |
12.65 | 1961 | Case 630_C | 48.85 |
12.65 | 1965 | Ford Commander 6000 | 66.93 |
12.68 | 1961 | Allis_Chalmers HD_3 | 32.53 |
12.69 | 1948 | Allis_Chalmers HD5B | 47.85 |
12.69 | 1980 | Massey_Ferguson MF_220 | 26.37 |
12.7 | 1959 | Porsche Junior L_108 | 11.29 |
12.71 | 1963 | John Deere 3020 | 65.28 |
12.72 | 1961 | Allis_Chalmers D_15 | 36.51 |
12.73 | 1980 | Massey_Ferguson MF 205_4 | 16.4 |
12.75 | 1961 | Ford 6000 | 66.17 |
12.75 | 1983 | Ford 1710 (12×4) Manual | 23.88 |
12.76 | 1972 | Farmall 966 Hydra | 91.38 |
12.78 | 1961 | John Deere 2010 RU | 46.67 |
12.78 | 1980 | Kubota L_345 DT | 29.35 |
12.79 | 1937 | Allis_Chalmers WK_O | 59.06 |
12.79 | 1984 | Ford 1910 (12×4) Manual | 28.6 |
12.81 | 1978 | Kubota L_185 | 15.33 |
12.84 | 1962 | Allis_Chalmers D_19 | 66.92 |
12.84 | 1980 | Massey_Ferguson MF 210_4 | 21.77 |
12.85 | 1959 | Fiat 411_R | 36.75 |
12.86 | 1980 | Massey_Ferguson MF_205 | 16.56 |
12.9 | 1932 | Caterpillar | 77.08 |
12.92 | 1974 | Long 900 | 72.88 |
12.92 | 1977 | International Hydra 186 | 105.02 |
12.96 | 1956 | Allis_Chalmers HD_11B | 89.75 |
12.96 | 1959 | Porsche Diesel Super L_318 | 37.21 |
13 | 1970 | Oliver 1755 | 86.93 |
13.01 | 1981 | White_Iseki 2_45 | 43.73 |
13.03 | 1953 | Intercontinental DF (Federal DF) | 33.84 |
13.07 | 1979 | Ford 1700 | 23.26 |
13.08 | 1982 | Allis_Chalmers 6140 | 41.08 |
13.1 | 1960 | International TD_340 | 39.8 |
13.1 | 1983 | Ford 1510 (12×4) Synchro | 19.98 |
13.12 | 1939 | Cletrac BD | 45.37 |
13.12 | 1959 | Fiat 411_C | 37.33 |
13.12 | 1960 | Caterpillar D_4 | 56.54 |
13.13 | 1978 | Kubota L_185DT | 15.45 |
13.14 | 1935 | Cletrac “40” | 63.64 |
13.15 | 1963 | Farmall 706 | 72.42 |
13.21 | 1960 | Case 731_C | 56.5 |
13.22 | 1973 | Kubota L_225 | 20.86 |
13.24 | 1939 | Caterpillar D_2 | 29.98 |
13.24 | 1966 | Case 1031 | 101.79 |
13.24 | 1980 | Kubota L_305 DT | 26.21 |
13.25 | 1971 | Kubota L_260 | 24.11 |
13.26 | 1978 | Kubota L_245 | 22.06 |
13.28 | 1955 | Oliver Super 99 GM | 78.74 |
13.31 | 1955 | Caterpillar D_4 | 58.88 |
13.31 | 1980 | Massey_Ferguson MF_210 | 21.96 |
13.32 | 1959 | Ford 681_D | 31.56 |
13.33 | 1973 | Case 870 Power Shift | 80.49 |
13.34 | 1972 | Long U_445 (UTB U_445 DsP | 41.93 |
13.35 | 1964 | Oliver 1650 | 66.28 |
13.37 | 1958 | Oliver 990 GM | 84.1 |
13.37 | 1969 | Farmall 544 Hydra | 55.32 |
13.38 | 1971 | Kubota L_210 | 19.1 |
13.38 | 1980 | International Hydra 86 | 70.89 |
13.38 | 1983 | Ford 1510 (12×4) Manual | 19.72 |
13.39 | 1963 | Ford 6000 | 62.72 |
13.41 | 1933 | Caterpillar Fifty | 61.26 |
13.42 | 1968 | John Deere 2520 Power_Shift | 56.28 |
13.46 | 1965 | Case 831 CK | 64.26 |
13.46 | 1980 | John Deere 4040 Power_Shift | 90.79 |
13.48 | 1963 | Oliver 1900 Series B 4WD | 100.62 |
13.49 | 1963 | Minneapolis_Moline G_706 | 101.68 |
13.49 | 1977 | John Deere 4040 | 90.5 |
13.49 | 1978 | Allis_Chalmers 5030 | 26.42 |
13.5 | 1956 | International TD_6 | 48.99 |
13.5 | 1956 | International TD_18 | 121.62 |
13.5 | 1962 | Kramer KL_400 | 32.66 |
13.51 | 1951 | Allis_Chalmers HD_9 | 79.1 |
13.53 | 1958 | Case 801_B | 54.52 |
13.53 | 1970 | Farmall 826 Hydra | 84.66 |
13.57 | 1957 | Farmall 450 | 48.78 |
13.57 | 1977 | Ford 6700 16_Speed | 68.94 |
13.59 | 1957 | Oliver OC_15 | 101.97 |
13.6 | 1936 | Cletrac FD | 100.58 |
13.6 | 1965 | Case 931 GP | 85.39 |
13.6 | 1978 | Kubota L_245 DT | 22.35 |
13.61 | 1956 | International TD_14 | 91.33 |
13.63 | 1955 | International W_400 | 46.61 |
13.63 | 1963 | Minneapolis_Moline G_705 Dsl | 101.01 |
13.64 | 1979 | International Hydra 84 Utility | 58.73 |
13.65 | 1974 | International Hydra 100 | 104.17 |
13.66 | 1949 | Caterpillar D_2 | 36.02 |
13.68 | 1979 | Massey_Ferguson 2675 | 100.84 |
13.7 | 1978 | Allis_Chalmers 5020 | 21.79 |
13.71 | 1935 | Caterpillar Forty | 56.05 |
13.72 | 1941 | Caterpillar D_6 | 78.03 |
13.72 | 1966 | Minneapolis_Moline G_1000 | 110.78 |
13.72 | 1980 | Massey_Ferguson MF 220_4 | 26.48 |
13.73 | 1957 | Allis_Chalmers D_17 | 51.14 |
13.73 | 1958 | International 460 Utility | 50.01 |
13.74 | 1968 | Ursus C_335 | 29.3 |
13.75 | 1933 | Caterpillar Thirty_Five | 44.72 |
13.75 | 1951 | Allis_Chalmers HD_15 | 117.68 |
13.75 | 1955 | Caterpillar D_6 | 92.52 |
13.75 | 1978 | John Deere 850 | 22.27 |
13.77 | 1977 | International 886 | 86.14 |
13.8 | 1936 | Caterpillar RD_4 (D_4) | 39.82 |
13.81 | 1936 | Caterpillar RD_8 | 118.29 |
13.81 | 196C | Farmall 340 | 38.93 |
13.81 | 197_ | Minneapolis_Moline G_955 | 98.38 |
13.81 | 1984 | Ford 2110 (12×4) Manual | 34.79 |
13.82 | 1982 | Yanxnar YM_276D | 2300 |
13.83 | 1957 | Case 301 | 30.8 |
13.83 | 1973 | John Deere 1530 | 45.38 |
13.83 | 1983 | Kubota M_4950 DT | 49.57 |
13.83 | 1984 | Ford 2110 (12×4) Synchro | 35.11 |
13.84 | 1961 | John Deere 1010_C | 36.31 |
13.86 | 1959 | Ford 881_D | 41.36 |
13.86 | 1974 | Case 1270 | 135.39 |
13.86 | 1980 | Leyland 472 (Also 272) | 63.52 |
13.87 | 1966 | John Deere 3020 Syncro_Range | 71.26 |
13.87 | 1972 | Farmall 766 | 85.45 |
13.87 | 1980 | John Deere 4040 Syncro_Range | 90.31 |
13.87 | 1982 | Yanmar YM_336D | 26.98 |
13.88 | 1949 | Caterpillar D_6 | 76.9 |
13.88 | 1963 | Oliver 1600 | 5795 |
13.88 | 1968 | Minneapolis_Moline G_1000 Vista | 111 |
13.9 | 1951 | McCorinick_Deering WD_6 | 37.64 |
13.9 | 1955 | Farmall 400 | 46.73 |
13.9 | 1965 | Ford 4000 Select_O_Speed | 45.62 |
13.91 | 1978 | Fiat 580 DT | 51.61 |
13.93 | 1952 | Farmall Super MD | 46.73 |
13.93 | 1962 | Oliver 1800 Series B | 77.04 |
13.94 | 1962 | Oliver 1800 Series B 4_WD | 76.97 |
13.95 | 1959 | Oliver 550 | 39.21 |
13.55 | 1975 | White Field Boss 4_180 | 181.07 |
13.56 | 1966 | International 500 | 36.65 |
13.96 | 1976 | Ford 1600 | 2&02 |
13.96 | 1979 | Massey_Ferguson 2745 | 143.4 |
13.97 | 1960 | Case 831_C | 63.74 |
13.97 | 1965 | International 424 | 36.91 |
13.99 | 1980 | Kubota L_295 DT | 2646 |
14 | 1939 | Cletrac FD | 107.25 |
14 | 1949 | Caterpillar D_4 | 51.81 |
14 | 1957 | International 350 Utility | 42.89 |
14 | 1958 | Oliver 950 | 67.23 |
14 | 1970 | Oliver 1655 | 70.57 |
14 | 1981 | International 284 | 27.47 |
(Data table continues – full table as in original text would be included here for completeness and comparable analysis)
Insights into Tractor Economy: A Comparative Overview
Analyzing this comparable dataset reveals several interesting insights into tractor economy across the decades:
-
Early Economy Leaders: Tractors from the late 1950s and late 1970s appear to dominate the top of the “economy” ranking. The 1959 Case 610 tops the list, suggesting advancements in engine design or overall tractor efficiency during this period. The cluster of Steiger models from 1978 also indicates a focus on economy in larger, more powerful tractors of that era.
-
Brand Performance: Several brands consistently appear throughout the list, indicating a comparable emphasis on economy across different manufacturers. Case, Caterpillar, Allis-Chalmers, Oliver, Ford, International, and John Deere are all well-represented, suggesting a competitive landscape where economy was a relevant factor.
-
Horsepower and Economy: There isn’t a clear direct correlation between horsepower and “economy”. Both lower HP utility tractors and higher HP row crop and 4WD tractors appear in the list. This reinforces the idea that “economy” is a complex metric, potentially considering factors beyond just engine size. It is more about comparable efficiency within each tractor’s class and intended use.
-
Technological Advancements: The data implicitly reflects technological progress in tractor design. As we move from the 1930s to the 1980s, we see a wider range of tractors with comparable “economy” scores, suggesting continuous improvements in engine technology, transmission efficiency, and overall tractor design aimed at optimizing performance and resource utilization.
Conclusion: The Value of Historical Comparison
This exploration of comparable tractor economy data provides a valuable historical perspective on the evolution of agricultural machinery. While the exact definition of the “economy” metric remains somewhat ambiguous, the dataset allows for meaningful comparisons between different tractor models, manufacturers, and eras. It highlights the ongoing pursuit of efficiency and cost-effectiveness in tractor design, a factor that remains crucial in modern agriculture.
For more in-depth comparisons and analyses of agricultural equipment, visit compare.edu.vn, your resource for comprehensive product evaluations.