Navigating the nuances of English grammar is crucial, especially when tackling the GMAT sentence correction section. Seemingly minor word choices can significantly alter meaning and correctness. Among the common points of confusion for test-takers are the phrases “compared with” and “compared to.” While both are used to draw comparisons, their correct usage hinges on understanding a subtle yet important distinction. This article will clarify the difference between “compared with” and “compared to”, equipping you with the knowledge to confidently answer GMAT sentence correction questions involving these comparative phrases.
Understanding the Core Difference: Comparing Similar and Dissimilar Things
The key to differentiating between “compared with” and “compared to” lies in the nature of the items being compared. “Compared with” is typically employed when you are examining similarities and differences between items of the same general category. You use “compared with” to analyze and contrast like things, highlighting their points of resemblance and divergence.
For example, consider comparing different brands of smartphones. You might say:
Compared with Brand X, Brand Y offers a longer battery life.
In this case, you are comparing two smartphones – both belong to the category of smartphones. “Compared with” is appropriate here because you are analyzing features and performance within the same class of objects. You could be comparing fuel efficiency of different car models, the box office success of different action movies, or the nutritional content of different breakfast cereals. The common thread is the comparison is happening within a defined, similar group.
On the other hand, “compared to” is used when you are drawing a comparison between fundamentally different categories of things. “Compared to” is often used to illustrate a point by drawing an analogy or highlighting a resemblance that might be unexpected given the disparate nature of the items. It’s about creating a figurative link or emphasizing a specific quality across different domains.
For instance:
His strength compared to a lion’s was truly remarkable.
Here, we are comparing a man’s strength not to another man’s strength, but to the strength of a lion – a creature from a different biological classification altogether. “Compared to” is suitable because we are making an analogy to emphasize the magnitude of his strength by relating it to something vastly different but known for that specific quality. You might compare the feeling of anxiety to being trapped in a cage, or the vastness of space compared to a grain of sand. The comparison is used to create a vivid image or convey a specific impression by linking disparate entities.
Delving Deeper: Nuances and GMAT Application
While the similar vs. dissimilar categories rule is a strong foundation, the GMAT may present scenarios with more subtle complexities. Sometimes, the distinction can become blurred based on the intended meaning. In informal usage, these phrases are often used interchangeably. However, for the GMAT, adhering to the more formal and precise distinction is crucial.
Consider these examples to further refine your understanding:
The company’s profits this quarter, compared with last quarter, show a significant improvement. (Comparing profits of similar time periods – “compared with”)
The city skyline, compared to a painting, was breathtaking in its beauty. (Comparing the skyline to art to emphasize its aesthetic quality – “compared to”)
Compared with her sister, she is more outgoing. (Comparing personalities of two sisters – “compared with”)
His calm demeanor, compared to the raging storm outside, was quite striking. (Comparing demeanor to a storm to highlight the contrast – “compared to”)
In GMAT sentence correction questions, pay close attention to what is being compared. Identify if the items belong to the same general class or are fundamentally different. Context is paramount. Analyze the sentence to determine if the comparison is meant to be a direct contrast within a category (“compared with”) or an illustrative analogy across categories (“compared to”).
Mastering “Compared With” and “Compared To” for GMAT Success
Understanding the nuanced difference between “compared with” and “compared to” is a valuable asset for GMAT sentence correction. By remembering that “compared with” is for similar item comparisons and “compared to” is for dissimilar or analogical comparisons, you can approach these questions with greater confidence and accuracy. Practice identifying the context in various sentences and consciously applying this rule. With focused practice, you’ll be well-prepared to tackle any GMAT question that tests your understanding of these essential comparative phrases.
