Determining which Mazda is comparable to the RAV4 involves a thorough examination of various factors, and COMPARE.EDU.VN is here to guide you. We provide an in-depth comparison, analyzing aspects such as performance, features, and price points to help you make an informed decision. By exploring these key areas, you’ll gain a clear understanding of which Mazda model aligns best with the renowned Toyota RAV4. This detailed comparison will cover crucial aspects like fuel efficiency, safety ratings, and interior space, ensuring you find the perfect compact crossover.
1. Mazda CX-50 vs. RAV4: Price and Trims
- Mazda CX-50: $32,000 to $45,000
- Toyota RAV4: $31,000 to over $50,000 (Prime)
- COMPARE.EDU.VN Recommendation: CX-50 2.5S Premium, RAV4 XLE Hybrid
1.1. Mazda CX-50 Pricing and Trim Options
The Mazda CX-50 mirrors Toyota’s approach with multiple trim levels and powertrain choices. All-wheel drive comes standard, offering an advantage over Toyota, which charges an extra $1,400 for it. The base model includes essential driver-assist technologies, keyless start, cloth upholstery, an 8.8-inch touchscreen with wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, and 17-inch alloy wheels. However, Toyota edges ahead in in-car technology because Mazda uses a console-mounted controller dial as the primary interface, making the touchscreen less accessible.
Upgrades include a larger 10.3-inch touchscreen, a 12-speaker Bose audio system, leather seats, power-adjustable heated and cooled front seats, and a panoramic sunroof. The recommended 2.5S Premium trim, priced around $35,000, includes these features. Opting for the hybrid version or the more powerful turbocharged engine will cost several thousand dollars more.
The Meridian Edition, priced at approximately $42,000, rivals the off-road-focused RAV4 TRD models. It features all-terrain tires on 18-inch alloy wheels, side rockers, a hood decal, and unique beige leather interiors called Terracotta by Mazda.
The top-tier 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus, nearly $54,000, positions Mazda in the premium segment alongside brands like Lincoln, Lexus, and Genesis. This trim includes a surround-view camera system, leather upholstery, a heated steering wheel, heated and cooled front seats, heated rear seats, a wireless smartphone charger, front and rear parking sensors, navigation, steering support for blind-spot monitors, and 20-inch wheels.
Hybrid variants fall in between, with the Preferred trim starting at $35,390, offering heated vinyl seats, a power driver’s seat, rain-sensing wipers, a wireless phone charger, and a power liftgate. The Premium trim, at $38,820, adds a panoramic sunroof, power passenger seat, memory settings, adaptive cruise control, black roof rails and exhaust tips, and a 12-speaker audio system. The top-end CX-50 Hybrid Premium Plus, priced at $42,085, features 19-inch alloy wheels, cooled front seats, a heated steering wheel, and power-folding side mirrors.
1.2. Toyota RAV4 Pricing and Trim Options
Even the most luxurious RAV4 can’t quite match the CX-50’s top-end features, but Toyota offers competitive pricing, excluding the plug-in hybrid Prime models. With fifteen trim options, the Toyota RAV4’s prices range from around $31,000 to over $41,000 for the Hybrid Limited. The base LE model provides excellent value with any powertrain, featuring 17-inch wheels, adaptive cruise control, cloth seats, and an 8.0-inch touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
Upgrading to the Hybrid powertrain in LE, XLE, SE, XLE, XSE, and Limited trims adds $2,600-$3,000 compared to their gasoline counterparts. The RAV4 Prime plug-in hybrid offers the best powertrain in the lineup, combining efficiency, power, and driving enjoyment. The Prime SE starts at about $45,000, approximately $9,000 more than the Hybrid SE. The Prime XSE, the top RAV4 trim, costs just under $49,000. Adding the Premium package, which includes an onboard charger, a head-up display, a panoramic sunroof, heated rear seats, and other comforts, pushes the price beyond $50,000, which may be a bit high for a RAV4.
Although the RAV4 Prime’s efficient powertrain and 42 miles of all-electric range make it ideal for city driving, not everyone may find the need to plug it in overnight appealing. In that case, the XLE Hybrid RAV4, priced under $36,000, is a recommended budget-friendly AWD option.
1.3. Pricing and Trim Comparison
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 (2.5S Premium) | Toyota RAV4 (XLE Hybrid) |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Approximately $35,000 | Under $36,000 |
| All-Wheel Drive | Standard | Standard |
| Touchscreen | 10.3-inch (optional) | 8.0-inch |
| Premium Audio | Bose (optional) | Standard |
| Leather Seats | Optional | Optional |
| Panoramic Sunroof | Optional | Optional |
| Adaptive Cruise | Standard | Standard |
| Wireless CarPlay | Standard | Standard |
| Android Auto | Standard | Standard |
1.4. Pricing Summary
- Mazda CX-50: Offers a range of well-equipped trims with standard AWD.
- Toyota RAV4: Provides a wide variety of trims, including hybrid and plug-in hybrid options.
1.5. COMPARE.EDU.VN Insight
For those seeking a gas-powered vehicle, the CX-50 offers an appealing package with standard AWD. However, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its hybrid and plug-in hybrid choices, providing better fuel efficiency and performance options.
Image of a 2025 Toyota RAV4, showcasing its exterior design and highlighting its appeal as a versatile and efficient compact SUV.
2. RAV4 vs. CX-50: Towing, Touring, and Performance
- Mazda CX-50: Superior handling and steering
- Toyota RAV4: Decent but unremarkable driving experience
- COMPARE.EDU.VN Recommendation: RAV4 Hybrid and Prime for compelling performance
2.1. Mazda CX-50 Performance Analysis
The CX-50 comes standard with all-wheel drive and a 6-speed automatic transmission paired with a 2.5-liter inline-4 engine producing 187 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque. While adequate, the 6-speed transmission allows the engine to rev higher, providing more power off the line but increasing cabin noise. Sport and Off-road modes adjust throttle response, with the latter offering more low-end torque and brake-based torque vectoring for moderate off-road capabilities.
The available 2.5-liter turbo-4 engine enhances the Mazda’s performance. It delivers 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque on regular gas (256 hp/320 lb-ft with 93-octane fuel), making the 6-speed transmission feel more suitable. Despite some initial lag from a standstill, especially in Sport mode, it provides a satisfying punch from around 2,000 rpm, making on-ramps and merging enjoyable.
The CX-50 Hybrid integrates Toyota’s proven planetary-based hybrid system, similar to the RAV4 Hybrid, producing 219 hp and 163 lb-ft of torque. While acceleration is slightly quicker than the base model, the overall performance remains unremarkable and doesn’t match the vehicle’s otherwise responsive feel. However, the hybrid version achieves impressive EPA ratings of 39 mpg city, 37 highway, and 38 combined.
The CX-50 Hybrid features a unique AWD system without a mechanical connection to the rear wheels. Instead, a separate electric motor provides 54 hp and 89 lb-ft of torque exclusively to the rear wheels. This setup enhances handling in fresh snowfall but doesn’t significantly boost dynamic handling.
The CX-50’s strengths lie in its steering and ride comfort. Its front strut and torsion beam rear suspension provide a balanced ride, neither too firm nor too soft. While not designed for aggressive cornering, the electric-assist steering ensures the CX-50 remains stable without frequent corrections.
2.2. Toyota RAV4 Performance Analysis
The RAV4 offers front-wheel drive or optional all-wheel drive, which comes standard on Hybrid, Prime, TRD Off-road, and Adventure trims. Non-hybrid models feature a simple front-to-rear power split, while Hybrid and Prime RAV4s use a second motor to power the rear axle, with the engine and primary motor powering the front wheels.
The RAV4’s 203-hp 4-cylinder engine paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission provides more responsiveness. However, it doesn’t necessarily make the ride quieter than the CX-50, and it may even be louder and buzzier when pushed. The 219-hp Hybrid combines that engine with a two-motor system and a CVT, promoting efficient driving and allowing electric-only power under light throttle. The RAV4 Prime delivers the most power at 302 hp, pairing the engine with two motors powered by an 18.1-kWh battery pack, enabling it to reach 60 mph in 5.7 seconds and offering pure electric driving range.
The battery gives the RAV4 a heavier feel on the road, but it still steers with precision and offers a well-tuned ride. All RAV4 models have improved steering and handling compared to earlier versions.
2.3. Performance Comparison Table
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 (2.5L) | Mazda CX-50 (2.5L Turbo) | Toyota RAV4 (2.5L) | Toyota RAV4 (Hybrid) | Toyota RAV4 (Prime) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | 2.5L Inline-4 | 2.5L Turbo Inline-4 | 2.5L Inline-4 | 2.5L Hybrid | 2.5L Plug-in Hybrid |
| Horsepower | 187 hp | 227/256 hp | 203 hp | 219 hp | 302 hp |
| Torque | 186 lb-ft | 310/320 lb-ft | 184 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft | N/A |
| Transmission | 6-Speed Automatic | 6-Speed Automatic | 8-Speed Automatic | CVT | CVT |
| Drivetrain | Standard AWD | Standard AWD | FWD/AWD | Standard AWD | Standard AWD |
2.4. Performance Summary
- Mazda CX-50: Offers engaging handling and steering, especially with the turbo engine.
- Toyota RAV4: Provides a range of powertrains, with the Hybrid and Prime models delivering compelling performance.
2.5. COMPARE.EDU.VN Insight
The CX-50 outperforms the base RAV4 in terms of driving dynamics. However, the RAV4 Hybrid and Prime models provide superior efficiency and power, making them more compelling choices for those prioritizing fuel economy and performance.
Image of a 2023 Mazda CX-50, emphasizing its sleek design and sporty handling, ideal for those who enjoy a more engaging driving experience.
3. RAV4 vs. CX-50: Fuel Economy
- Mazda CX-50: 6-speed automatic transmission impacts fuel efficiency
- Toyota RAV4: 28 mpg combined; Hybrid at 38 mpg
- COMPARE.EDU.VN Recommendation: RAV4 Prime for 42 miles of plug-in range
3.1. Mazda CX-50 Fuel Economy
The CX-50 achieves below-average fuel economy for the compact crossover class. A transmission with more gears might help lower engine revs, improving efficiency. Even with standard all-wheel drive, it lags behind competitors like the Subaru Forester and Honda CR-V by at least 2 mpg combined. Here are the EPA ratings:
- 2.5-liter: 24 mpg city, 30 highway, 27 combined
- CX-50 Hybrid: 39 mpg city, 37 highway, 38 combined
- 2.5-liter Turbo: 23 mpg city, 29 highway, 25 combined
3.2. Toyota RAV4 Fuel Economy
The CX-50 gets below-average fuel economy for the compact crossover class. More gears in its transmission might keep its revs lower to operate more efficiently. Even with standard all-wheel drive, it trails the Subaru Forester, Honda CR-V, and rivals by at least 2 mpg combined with AWD. And Hybrid versions are likely to pay back their initial price premium within a few years of typical use. Here are the EPA ratings:
- Base inline-4: 27 mpg city, 34 highway, 30 combined (AWD costs 1 mpg)
- RAV4 Hybrid AWD: 41 mpg city, 38 highway, 39 combined; Hybrid AWD Woodland: 38 mpg city, 35 highway, 37 combined
- RAV4 Prime: 42 miles of electric range; 94 mpg combined (engine and motor); 38 mpg combined (engine only)
3.3. Fuel Economy Comparison Table
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 (2.5L) | Mazda CX-50 (2.5L Turbo) | Toyota RAV4 (2.5L) | Toyota RAV4 (Hybrid) | Toyota RAV4 (Prime) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City MPG | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | 27 mpg | 41 mpg | 94 MPGe |
| Highway MPG | 30 mpg | 29 mpg | 34 mpg | 38 mpg | 38 mpg (engine only) |
| Combined MPG | 27 mpg | 25 mpg | 30 mpg | 39 mpg | 94 MPGe |
3.4. Fuel Economy Summary
- Mazda CX-50: Below-average fuel economy in its class.
- Toyota RAV4: Offers better fuel economy, particularly with the Hybrid and Prime models.
3.5. COMPARE.EDU.VN Insight
The RAV4 outperforms the CX-50 in fuel efficiency, especially with its Hybrid and Prime models. The RAV4 Prime offers the added benefit of 42 miles of electric range, making it an excellent choice for eco-conscious drivers.
Image of the 2025 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid, illustrating its fuel efficiency and eco-friendly features, ideal for those seeking a greener driving experience.
4. Mazda CX-50 vs. RAV4: Safety
- Mazda CX-50: Top Safety Pick+ award
- Toyota RAV4: Top Safety Pick (missed the “+”)
- COMPARE.EDU.VN Recommendation: Both offer excellent safety tech
4.1. Mazda CX-50 Safety Analysis
The IIHS awards the CX-50 with top crash-test ratings and a Top Safety Pick+ award, highlighting its excellent safety features. All models include automatic emergency braking, active lane control, blind-spot monitors, automatic high beams, and adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go functionality. However, rearward visibility is limited, so consider the available surround-view camera system and parking sensors.
The hybrid version of the CX-50 has a unique floor structure, with front frame rails set wider apart. While hybrid models typically maintain the same safety ratings as their non-hybrid counterparts, it is uncertain whether the CX-50 Hybrid will carry over the federal five-star and IIHS Top Safety Pick+ status.
4.2. Toyota RAV4 Safety Analysis
The RAV4 is safe but did not achieve the highest honor from the IIHS, settling for a Top Safety Pick due to its performance in the updated side-impact test. It received five stars from the NHTSA, although the NHTSA’s criteria are less stringent than those of the IIHS. Toyota matches the driver-assist tech in the CX-50 with standard automatic emergency braking, automatic high-beam headlights, active lane control, and adaptive cruise control. Like the CX-50, the RAV4 has limited rear visibility due to thick roof pillars.
4.3. Safety Features Comparison Table
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Emergency Braking | Standard | Standard |
| Active Lane Control | Standard | Standard |
| Blind-Spot Monitors | Standard | Standard |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | Standard | Standard |
| IIHS Top Safety Pick | Yes | Yes |
| NHTSA 5-Star Safety Rating | N/A | Yes |
| Surround-View Camera (Option) | Available | Available |
| Parking Sensors (Option) | Available | Available |
4.4. Safety Summary
- Mazda CX-50: Earns a Top Safety Pick+ award with comprehensive safety features.
- Toyota RAV4: Receives a Top Safety Pick and offers comparable safety technology.
4.5. COMPARE.EDU.VN Insight
Both the CX-50 and RAV4 offer excellent safety features, making them top choices for safety-conscious buyers. The CX-50’s Top Safety Pick+ award gives it a slight edge, but both vehicles provide a high level of protection.
Image of a 2023 Toyota RAV4, highlighting its safety features and design, which contribute to its strong safety ratings and appeal to safety-conscious consumers.
5. RAV4 vs. CX-50: Size, Space, and Cargo Capacity
- Mazda CX-50: Larger than CX-5, less spacious than RAV4
- Toyota RAV4: Greater cargo capacity
- COMPARE.EDU.VN Recommendation: CX-50 for rear legroom; RAV4 for cargo space
5.1. Mazda CX-50 Dimensions and Space
The Mazda CX-50 appears to have been benchmarked against the RAV4 in terms of dimensions, but it offers slightly more passenger space. It is 4.3 inches longer with a wheelbase nearly five inches longer, translating to roomier seating for four. The fifth seat is suitable for shorter trips or younger passengers.
The front seats offer support for various body types, with most models including power adjustments and seat heaters. The leather upholstery and overall fit and finish give it a luxury feel when stationary. However, there is noticeable tire and wind noise on the highway. At 5.3 inches shorter in height than the RAV4, the CX-50 may feel less spacious for taller passengers, especially with the sunroof option.
Hybrid versions of the CX-50 have slightly different dimensions, particularly in rear-seat space, but they effectively feel just as spacious.
5.2. Toyota RAV4 Dimensions and Space
The RAV4 offers more interior volume due to its cargo hold, providing 37.0 cubic feet of space compared to the CX-50’s 31.4 cubic feet. The Prime model has slightly less space due to its battery placement in the back. Toyota optimizes the interior with clever storage spaces, such as wide door pockets and a dash shelf for smartphones.
Toyota has improved the RAV4’s interior, with mid-to-top trims and hybrid models featuring comfortable bucket seats with power adjustments. The interior can be upgraded to a premium grade, but the CX-50 achieves this more naturally and thoroughly. The RAV4’s cargo area maxes out at a useful 69.8 cubic feet, compared to just 56.3 cubic feet in the CX-50.
5.3. Size and Space Comparison Table
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.8 inches | 180.9 inches |
| Wheelbase | 110.8 inches | 105.9 inches |
| Cargo Space (Rear Seats Up) | 31.4 cu ft | 37.0 cu ft |
| Cargo Space (Rear Seats Down) | 56.3 cu ft | 69.8 cu ft |
| Rear Legroom | 39.8 inches | 37.8 inches |
5.4. Size and Space Summary
- Mazda CX-50: Offers roomier passenger space and a more upscale interior.
- Toyota RAV4: Provides greater cargo space and clever storage solutions.
5.5. COMPARE.EDU.VN Insight
The CX-50 offers more comfortable passenger space, while the RAV4 excels in cargo capacity. If passenger comfort is a priority, the CX-50 is a better choice. However, if you need more cargo space, the RAV4 is the preferred option.
Image of the 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium, showcasing its interior design and comfortable passenger space, ideal for those prioritizing a luxurious and comfortable ride.
6. CX-50 vs. RAV4: Styling
- Mazda CX-50: Aims for a rugged look similar to the RAV4
- Toyota RAV4: Bold and distinctive design
- COMPARE.EDU.VN Recommendation: RAV4 for exterior styling
6.1. Mazda CX-50 Styling Analysis
The CX-50 departs from the smooth elegance of the CX-5, targeting American preferences for larger, bolder designs. While not unattractive, it lacks a striking presence. With its broad grille, cladded fenders, and squared-off ends, it blends in rather than stands out.
The interior is more distinctive, featuring a clean dash and a neatly integrated center screen with climate controls. Available leather upholstery with tasteful contrast stitching adds to its appeal.
6.2. Toyota RAV4 Styling Analysis
Toyota matches the interior design quality with top and hybrid trims. The interior has a functional design and has evolved from the utilitarian RAV4 of the past.
The exterior features more daring design elements, conveying confidence in its market-leading position. It combines elements of the Tacoma and 4Runner, with a blunt front end and bold fenders, and incorporates creases and folds without overdoing it.
6.3. Styling Comparison Table
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Exterior Design | Rugged, American-inspired | Bold, Tacoma/4Runner DNA |
| Interior Design | Clean, upscale | Functional, modern |
| Overall Appeal | Blends in | Stands out |
6.4. Styling Summary
- Mazda CX-50: Offers a rugged, American-inspired design.
- Toyota RAV4: Features a bold and distinctive exterior design.
6.5. COMPARE.EDU.VN Insight
The RAV4’s more daring and distinctive design gives it an edge over the CX-50. While the CX-50 is not unattractive, the RAV4’s bold styling helps it stand out in a crowded market.
Image of the 2025 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, highlighting its bold exterior design and advanced features, making it a standout choice in the compact SUV market.
7. Which Is Better: Mazda CX-50 or Toyota RAV4?
The Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 both earn a TCC Rating of 6.7 out of 10. The Mazda CX-50 offers better on-road performance and a nicer interior. The RAV4 has a better fuel economy rating, thanks to a lineup that emphasizes hybrid versions. The closely matched ratings suggest that the choice depends on individual preferences, particularly regarding features and driving experience.
7.1. Performance and Handling
The Mazda CX-50 provides a more engaging driving experience with superior handling and steering, while the Toyota RAV4 offers a more comfortable and composed ride.
7.2. Fuel Efficiency
The Toyota RAV4, especially the Hybrid and Prime models, offers better fuel economy than the Mazda CX-50. The RAV4 Prime’s plug-in hybrid capability provides additional savings on fuel costs.
7.3. Interior and Comfort
The Mazda CX-50 has a more upscale and refined interior, while the Toyota RAV4 offers more cargo space and practical storage solutions.
7.4. Safety
Both models offer excellent safety features and have received high safety ratings from IIHS and NHTSA.
7.5. COMPARE.EDU.VN Final Verdict
The choice between the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 depends on your priorities. If you value a more engaging driving experience and a luxurious interior, the CX-50 is a great option. If fuel efficiency, cargo space, and a wide range of hybrid options are more important, the RAV4 is the better choice.
7.6. Winner: The CX-50 carries the day—by a nose—but we’d pick a RAV4 Hybrid.
8. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
8.1. What are the main differences between the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4?
The Mazda CX-50 offers better on-road performance and a more luxurious interior, while the Toyota RAV4 excels in fuel economy and cargo space.
8.2. Which model has better fuel economy?
The Toyota RAV4 has better fuel economy, especially the Hybrid and Prime models.
8.3. Which model has more cargo space?
The Toyota RAV4 has more cargo space than the Mazda CX-50.
8.4. Which model is safer?
Both models are very safe, but the Mazda CX-50 has a Top Safety Pick+ award, while the Toyota RAV4 has a Top Safety Pick.
8.5. Which model is more fun to drive?
The Mazda CX-50 offers a more engaging and fun driving experience.
8.6. Which model has a more luxurious interior?
The Mazda CX-50 has a more luxurious and refined interior.
8.7. Which model has more hybrid options?
The Toyota RAV4 offers more hybrid options, including a plug-in hybrid (Prime) model.
8.8. Which model has standard all-wheel drive?
The Mazda CX-50 comes standard with all-wheel drive, while it is optional on some Toyota RAV4 trims.
8.9. What is the price range for each model?
The Mazda CX-50 ranges from $32,000 to $45,000, while the Toyota RAV4 ranges from $31,000 to over $50,000 for the Prime model.
8.10. Which model is recommended by COMPARE.EDU.VN?
COMPARE.EDU.VN recommends the Mazda CX-50 for its driving dynamics and interior, but suggests the RAV4 Hybrid for better fuel economy and versatility.
9. Conclusion: Make an Informed Decision with COMPARE.EDU.VN
Choosing between the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 depends on your individual needs and preferences. The Mazda CX-50 offers a more engaging driving experience and a luxurious interior, making it ideal for those who prioritize performance and comfort. On the other hand, the Toyota RAV4 provides better fuel economy, more cargo space, and a variety of hybrid options, making it a practical choice for eco-conscious drivers and those needing extra space.
At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we understand the challenges of comparing different vehicles. That’s why we provide detailed, objective comparisons to help you make an informed decision. Whether you’re looking for the best fuel economy, the most luxurious interior, or the most engaging driving experience, COMPARE.EDU.VN is here to help you find the perfect vehicle to fit your needs.
Don’t let the decision overwhelm you. Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN today to explore our comprehensive comparisons and reviews. Our resources will help you confidently choose the right vehicle, ensuring you get the most value and satisfaction from your purchase. Let COMPARE.EDU.VN be your guide to making the best choice for your needs.
Ready to make your decision? Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN today to explore more comparisons and find the perfect vehicle for you. Our team at compare.edu.vn is dedicated to providing you with the most accurate and helpful information. Contact us at 333 Comparison Plaza, Choice City, CA 90210, United States, or reach us via WhatsApp at +1 (626) 555-9090. We’re here to help you drive away with confidence.
