How Do Salaries For Teachers Compare To Average National Wages? It’s a crucial question that COMPARE.EDU.VN addresses, as adequate teacher compensation is vital for retaining talent and attracting skilled individuals to the profession. This article explores the compensation gap between teachers and other college graduates, offering insights into wage disparities and total compensation packages using keyword analysis, salary comparison, and wage trends. Discover how teacher compensation impacts educational quality, staffing challenges, and the future of the teaching profession with data-driven insights and national averages on COMPARE.EDU.VN.
1. Introduction: The Teacher Compensation Challenge
For decades, there have been concerns regarding whether the United States is compensating its teachers sufficiently to retain current staff and attract a highly skilled pool of future college students into the profession. Research consistently reveals a worsening trend, posing a significant and growing challenge for the teaching profession. Due to the requirement of at least a bachelor’s degree for public school teachers, these studies often compare teachers with college graduates in other professions. The goal is to provide teachers with compensation commensurate with that of similarly educated and experienced professionals to retain and attract qualified individuals. Over the past two decades, the weekly wages and total compensation of public school teachers have fallen increasingly behind, a trend that must be addressed to maintain the quality of education.
2. Key Findings: Disparities in Teacher Compensation
Several key findings highlight the disparities in teacher compensation compared to average national wages:
2.1. Recent Inflation Impact
Recent high inflation has disproportionately affected teachers’ average weekly wages. From 2021 to 2022, the average weekly wages of public school teachers, adjusted for inflation, decreased significantly, while the inflation-adjusted weekly wages of other college graduates remained relatively stable.
2.2. The Growing Weekly Wage Penalty
The erosion of relative weekly wages for teachers continued in 2022. The weekly wage penalty for teachers, after adjusting for factors like age, education, and state of residence, reached a record high. This penalty indicates a substantial disparity in earnings between teachers and their similarly educated counterparts.
2.3. Total Compensation Discrepancies
While teachers often receive better benefits packages, this advantage hasn’t been enough to offset the growing wage penalty. The total compensation penalty for teachers increased in 2022, indicating a persistent gap in overall remuneration.
2.4. State-Specific Wage Penalties
The relative teacher wage penalty exceeds 20% in a majority of states. State-specific estimates of weekly wage penalties for teachers vary widely, with some states showing significantly larger disparities than others.
3. Data and Methodology: Analyzing Teacher Compensation
This report leverages data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to analyze public school teachers and other non-teaching college graduates. A comprehensive discussion of the data and methodologies used to produce teacher weekly wage and total compensation estimates can be found in a prior report by Allegretto and Mishel (2019), Appendix A.
3.1. Current Population Survey (CPS-ORG) Data
Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Groups (CPS-ORG) data is used for wage analyses. To account for the “summers off” issue for teachers, the focus is on weekly wages, avoiding comparisons of weekly hours worked or length of the work year between teachers and other college graduates. The sample is restricted to full-time workers (working at least 35 hours per week), aged 18 to 64 years, with at least a bachelor’s degree, as teachers today need at least a bachelor’s degree to teach. The sample is further limited to those who reported their wage information directly (excluding those whose wages were estimated by BLS).
3.2. Top-Coding Adjustments
To preserve data confidentiality, the Bureau of Labor Statistics records weekly wages only up to a defined threshold, called top-coding. This threshold hasn’t been updated for inflation since 1998, resulting in more workers being assigned top-coded wages and understating college graduate wages relative to teachers. EPI replaces original top-coded values with Pareto-distribution implied means above the CPS top-code for men and women.
3.3. National Compensation Survey (ECEC) Data
The second data source used to assess benefits is from BLS’s National Compensation Survey’s Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC) program. Data is pulled on employer costs per hour worked for detailed categories of compensation for “primary, secondary, and special education schoolteachers” in the public sector and “civilian professionals”—the latter being the broadest category available that largely corresponds to college graduates. “Benefits” in this analysis refer to employer costs for health and life insurance, retirement plans, and payroll taxes.
3.4. Wage Measurement
The remaining components of compensation are “W-2 wages,” corresponding to the wages captured in the Current Population Survey data used above. W-2 wages are the wages reported to employees and to the Internal Revenue Service, including “direct wages” and other wage items, including “supplemental pay.” Supplemental pay includes premium pay for overtime, bonus pay, profit-sharing, and “paid leave.”
4. Average Weekly Wage Trends: A Historical Perspective
Analyzing average weekly wage trends provides a historical perspective on teacher compensation compared to other college graduates. These trends reveal the fluctuations and disparities over the years.
4.1. Inflation-Adjusted Wages
Figure A illustrates the average weekly wages of public school teachers and other college graduates from 1979 through 2022, adjusted for inflation. The data shows a significant drop in teachers’ weekly wages from 2021 to 2022. Keep in mind these wages are “real,” meaning that they are adjusted for inflation. In 2022 inflation was 8.1%—the highest level since 1981 and more than three times as high as inflation has been in recent years. For context, annual inflation averaged just 2.2% over the previous two decades. To put it another way, high inflation reduced the buying power of teachers in 2022.
4.2. Wage Stagnation
Real wages for teachers have been relatively flat for decades, meaning that modest nominal increases in weekly wages were similar to increases in inflation. High inflation cancels out the benefits of modest wage increases. In order for there to be increases in standards of living, nominal increases in pay need to exceed the rate of inflation—something that teachers, on average, have not experienced for a long time.
4.3. Divergence in Wages
Between 1979 and 1993, the average weekly wage of teachers was below that of other college graduates, but for the most part, the wages of teachers and other college graduates trended together until 1996 when they began diverging considerably. In 1996, the inflation-adjusted average weekly wage of teachers was 15.7% less than that of other college graduates. That difference grew by 23 percentage points to 38.7% in 2022.
4.4. Impact of Inflation
From 2021 to 2022, real wages for teachers fell by a bit more than inflation (8.8% vs 8.1%), meaning that the lion’s share of the decline was due to inflation, not a large drop in nominal wages. Regardless, the buying power of teachers took a big hit, and significant future pay increases will be needed to recoup the large loss. This was not the case for the earnings of other college graduates as weekly wages, on average, just about kept pace with the large increase in inflation.
4.5. Market Dynamics
This dynamic is likely explained (at least in part) because teachers’ wages are often set by long-term union contracts and dependent on government budgets. In contrast, the private sector can often respond more quickly to improving or deteriorating economic conditions by adjusting wages. Other college graduates were able to garner an increase in nominal wages to keep pace with inflation, thereby keeping their buying power relatively steady in 2022. Future increases in teacher pay—that are significantly above future annual rates of inflation—are needed to recoup the large loss of buying power that occurred in 2022.
5. Relative Differences: Regression-Adjusted Trends
Regression-adjusted trends offer a more nuanced comparison by controlling for factors that typically affect pay, such as age, educational attainment, and state of residence.
5.1. Wage Penalty or Premium
Relative wage results are presented to show how much less (or more) teachers earn in weekly wages relative to other college graduates estimated via regression analysis. A weekly wage “penalty” for teachers is reported when the regression estimates suggest that teachers, all else being equal, are paid less than other college graduates. A penalty appears as a negative number in Figure B. When teachers are paid relatively more, the number is positive and is referenced as a “premium.”
5.2. Record Wage Penalties
In 2022, the largest weekly wage teacher penalties ever recorded in this series were estimated. For all teachers, the penalty worsened to 26.4%. Otherwise, on average, teachers earned 73.6 cents on the dollar in 2022 nationally compared with what similar college graduates earned working in other professions. This is much less than the relative 93.9 cents on the dollar that teachers earned in 1996. As depicted in Figure B, the occasional easing of the penalties over time never lasts as strong downward trends persist for all teachers and separately by gender.
5.3. Wage Penalty for Female Teachers
The trending wage penalty for female teachers (compared with other female professionals) crossed over the 20% threshold for the first time in 2022 to 21.3%, a quickening decline from parity in 1996. Over a longer sweep of history, previous research (using Census data) indicates that the wage estimates for female teachers moved from significant premiums to large penalties.
5.4. Historical Trends
For example, in previous work, it was documented that relative female teacher earnings saw a 14.7% premium in 1960, which dipped to 10.4% in 1970 to near parity in 1980 (pre-1979 years not shown in Figure B). Starting in 1996, there has been a continued erosion of teachers’ relative wages (shown in Figure B). By 2022, the cumulative change has been a 36.0 percentage-point deterioration in the relative wage of female teachers since 1960.
5.5. Improved Labor Market Opportunities for Women
The context for this trend of declining relative wages for teachers is a positive one for women—labor market opportunities have greatly improved over the last six decades, as have educational opportunities. The teaching profession once had a somewhat captive labor pool of women to depend on. Thankfully that is no longer the case, but increased opportunity costs do matter. As wider opportunities for women in the labor force push up wages for female college graduates, simply maintaining the same quality of the labor market pool for teachers will require steady raises in real teachers’ pay now that the teaching profession must compete with other fields for qualified women. Otherwise, educational quality will be compromised.
5.6. Wage Penalty for Male Teachers
Over the last six decades, estimates of relative teacher wages for men have always been larger than the teaching penalty for women. Historically, the penalty for men has worsened significantly. The enormous teaching penalty for men that persists today goes a long way in explaining why men who may want to choose teaching as a career may not be able to afford to do so. The large and worsening teacher pay penalty for men is one of the reasons why approximately three in four teachers are women, which is largely unchanged since 1960.
6. Teacher Weekly Wage Penalties by State: Regional Disparities
The national weekly wage penalty for teachers was 26.4% in 2022, but there is much variation across states. Regression estimates by state pool six years of Current Population Survey data to ensure adequate sample sizes for each state, comparing public school teachers with nonteacher college graduates within each state to estimate weekly wage gaps.
6.1. State Variations
Figure C shows that in no state does the relative (regression adjusted) weekly wage of teachers equal or surpass that of their nonteaching college graduate counterparts. The bars are sorted from the largest (37.4%) to the smallest (7.6%) state penalties.
6.2. States with Largest Penalties
There are six states where teachers, on average, earn less than 70 cents on the dollar compared with similar college graduates in their respective states. The largest state penalties are in Colorado, Arizona, Virginia, Oklahoma, Alabama, and Missouri.
6.3. Teacher Protests
The first four states listed had walkouts in response to low pay and other issues around public education funding in 2018–2019.
6.4. Map Presentation of State Penalties
Figure D is a map presentation of the state penalties reported in Figure C.
How underpaid are teachers in your state?: Depending on the state, teachers make between 7.6% and 37.4% less than other comparable college-educated workers
7. Adding Benefits to the Picture: Total Compensation Analysis
Analyzing total compensation, which includes benefits, provides a more comprehensive view of teacher remuneration.
7.1. Significance of Benefits
Weekly wages make up an important and significant part of compensation, but to get an accounting of the total compensation of teachers and non-teacher professionals, other benefits of employment such as health and other insurance, and retirement plans must be added in. Teachers generally receive a higher share of their total compensation as benefits than other professionals do, partially offsetting the weekly wage penalty.
7.2. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC)
The Bureau of Labor Statistics Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC) series measures the average employer cost per employee hour worked for total compensation, wages and salaries, and benefits, and costs as a percent of total compensation. Benefits packages of primary, secondary, and special education public school teachers are compared with those of comparable workers (specifically, workers in professional occupations).
7.3. W-2 Wage Share of Compensation
The first pair of columns in Table 1 under “W-2 wage share of compensation” presents the share of W-2 wages that make up total compensation for professionals in all occupations and for K–12 public school teachers. The W-2 wage share of compensation and the benefits share of compensation sum to 100. These W-2 shares permit an examination of how important wages are relative to benefits in the total compensation package.
7.4. Benefits Advantage
In 2022, W-2 wages made up 69.8% of teachers’ total compensation. For professionals, the share was 78.7%. That means that for every dollar of teachers’ total compensation, 69.8 cents went to wages and 30.2 cents went to benefits, while for professionals, 78.7 cents went to wages and 21.3 cents went to benefits. Therefore, for every dollar of total compensation, public school teachers receive more in benefits than other professionals do. This is referred to as the “benefits advantage.”
7.5. Total Compensation Penalty
Combining the wage penalty and benefits advantage provides a measure of how teachers compare with other professionals on total compensation. Per usual, the benefits advantage for teachers partially offsets their estimated relative wage disadvantage but still leaves teachers with a significant total compensation penalty of 17.0% in 2022—the largest to date.
7.6. Trends in Benefits Advantage
The benefits advantage that favors teachers has been growing in the 21st century from 2.2% in 2004 to 9.4% in 2022. This increase was not nearly enough to offset the growing teacher wage penalty that worsened from 12.8% to 26.4% over the same timeframe. The large teacher wage penalty, in combination with the larger share that earnings make up of total compensation, suggests that it is likely that the total compensation penalty for teachers will not improve without significant changes to teachers’ wages.
8. Addressing the Teacher Compensation Gap: Potential Solutions
Closing the teacher compensation gap requires a multi-faceted approach involving policy changes, increased funding, and innovative strategies.
8.1. Policy Changes
Implementing policies that prioritize teacher pay and benefits can help attract and retain qualified educators. This includes advocating for legislation that increases teacher salaries and improves access to affordable healthcare and retirement plans.
8.2. Increased Funding
Investing in public education is essential for ensuring that teachers receive fair compensation. This can be achieved through increased state and federal funding, as well as local initiatives that support teacher salaries and benefits.
8.3. Innovative Strategies
Exploring alternative compensation models, such as performance-based pay or student loan forgiveness programs, can help incentivize teachers and improve recruitment and retention rates. Additionally, providing opportunities for professional development and career advancement can make teaching a more attractive and sustainable career path.
9. Conclusion: Ensuring Fair Teacher Compensation for a Brighter Future
Addressing the teacher compensation gap is crucial for attracting and retaining qualified educators, ultimately benefiting students and society as a whole. By analyzing weekly wage trends, relative differences, state-specific penalties, and the impact of benefits, this report sheds light on the complexities of teacher compensation and the need for comprehensive solutions. It is imperative that policymakers, education leaders, and communities work together to prioritize fair teacher compensation and ensure a brighter future for our students.
The relative teacher weekly wages have continued their long eroding trend. These trends in teacher wages and total compensation have had profound consequences for the profession. Certainly, the alarms have been sounding from teacher staffing challenges to college students forgoing teaching careers because of low pay to a majority of parents steering their children into better paying professions. These staffing shortages have led to fast tracking credentials, using unqualified teachers, and states allowing almost anyone to substitute teach.
One of our nation’s highest ideals is the promise to educate every child without regard to means. In many respects, we have always fallen short on that promise. And there are many issues to be addressed around public education and its funding. But one thing is for sure. A world-class public educational system cannot be accomplished without the best and the brightest heading our classrooms. And it cannot be done on the cheap.
10. Call to Action
Ready to make informed decisions about your career or educational path? Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN to explore detailed comparisons, objective analyses, and expert insights. Whether you’re weighing job offers, evaluating degree programs, or seeking the best educational resources, COMPARE.EDU.VN provides the comprehensive data you need to succeed. Navigate to COMPARE.EDU.VN today and take the first step toward a more informed future.
For further inquiries, contact us at:
Address: 333 Comparison Plaza, Choice City, CA 90210, United States
WhatsApp: +1 (626) 555-9090
Website: compare.edu.vn
11. FAQ Section
11.1. How does the average teacher salary compare to other professions requiring a similar level of education?
The average teacher salary often lags behind other professions requiring a bachelor’s degree. Factors such as experience, location, and subject matter can influence this comparison.
11.2. What are the main factors contributing to the teacher pay gap?
Several factors contribute to the teacher pay gap, including inadequate funding, undervaluing of the profession, and the impact of inflation on wages.
11.3. Do teacher salaries vary significantly by state or region?
Yes, teacher salaries can vary significantly by state or region. Factors such as cost of living, local funding, and collective bargaining agreements can influence salary levels.
11.4. Are there any strategies to improve teacher compensation?
Strategies to improve teacher compensation include advocating for increased funding, implementing performance-based pay models, and providing opportunities for professional development.
11.5. How does teacher compensation impact student outcomes?
Teacher compensation can impact student outcomes by attracting and retaining high-quality educators. Fair compensation can also reduce teacher turnover, leading to more consistent instruction.
11.6. What benefits do teachers typically receive in addition to their base salary?
Teachers typically receive benefits such as health insurance, retirement plans, paid time off, and professional development opportunities.
11.7. How can I find information about teacher salaries in my state?
You can find information about teacher salaries in your state by consulting the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) or contacting your state’s Department of Education.
11.8. Are there any loan forgiveness programs available for teachers?
Yes, there are loan forgiveness programs available for teachers, such as the Teacher Loan Forgiveness Program and Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF).
11.9. How does teacher compensation affect recruitment and retention rates?
Teacher compensation significantly affects recruitment and retention rates. Higher salaries and better benefits can attract more qualified candidates and reduce turnover rates.
11.10. What are some common misconceptions about teacher pay?
Common misconceptions about teacher pay include the belief that teachers are overpaid or that their salaries are comparable to other professions with similar education requirements.
References
Allegretto, Sylvia A. 2022. “The Teacher Pay Penalty Has Hit a New High.” Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, August 2022.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., Sean P. Corcoran, and Lawrence Mishel. 2004. How Does Teacher Pay Compare? Methodological Challenges and Answers. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., Sean P. Corcoran, and Lawrence Mishel. 2008. The Teaching Penalty: Teacher Pay Losing Ground. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., Sean P. Corcoran, and Lawrence Mishel. 2011. The Teaching Penalty: An Update Through 2010. Economic Policy Institute Issue Brief no. 298, March 2011.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., Emma García, and Elaine Weiss. 2022. Public Education Funding in the U.S. Needs an Overhaul: How a Larger Federal Role Would Boost Equity and Shield Children from Disinvestment During Downturns. Economic Policy Institute, July 2022.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., and Lawrence Mishel. 2016. The Teacher Pay Gap Is Wider Than Ever: Teachers’ Pay Continues to Fall Further Behind Pay of Comparable Workers. Economic Policy Institute, August 2016.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., and Lawrence Mishel. 2018. The Teacher Pay Penalty Has Hit a New High: Trends in the Teacher Wage and Compensation Gaps Through 2017. Economic Policy Institute, September 2018.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., and Lawrence Mishel. 2019. The Teacher Weekly Wage Penalty Hit 21.4 Percent in 2018, a Record High. Economic Policy Institute, April 2019.
Allegretto, Sylvia A., and Ilan Tojerow. 2014. “Teacher Staffing and Pay Differences: Public and Private Schools.” Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics), September 2014.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2023a. “Employer Costs for Employee Compensation Summary” (news release). June 16, 2023.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2023b. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation Historical Listing: National Compensation Survey, data tables accessed August 1, 2023.
Croft, Michelle, Gretchen Guffy, and Dan Vitale. 2018. Encouraging More High School Students to Consider Teaching. ACT Policy Research, June 2018.
Economic Policy Institute (EPI). 2023a. Current Population Survey Extracts, Version 1.0.41, https://microdata.epi.org. Accessed July 2023.
Economic Policy Institute (EPI). 2023b. “Methodology: Wage Variables.” EPI Microdata Extracts documentation.
Fortin, Jacey, and Eliza Fawcett. 2023. “How Bad Is the Teacher Shortage? Depends Where You Live.” New York Times, August 29, 2022.
Franco, Marguerite, and Susan Kemper Patrick. 2023. State Teacher Shortages: Teaching Positions Left Vacant or Filled by Teachers Without Full Certification. Learning Policy Institute, July 27, 2023.
García, Emma, and Elaine Weiss. 2020. Examining the Factors That Play a Role in the Teacher Shortage Crisis: Key Findings from EPI’s “Perfect Storm in the Teacher Labor Market” Series. Economic Policy Institute, October 2020.
Learning Policy Institute (LPI). 2023. Blog Series on Educator Quality: Recruitment & Retention. LPI Blog. Accessed July 2023.
Phi Delta Kappan (PDK). 2018. Teaching: Respect but Dwindling Appeal. The 50th Annual PDK Poll of the Public’s Attitudes Toward the Public Schools. Supplement to Kappan magazine, September 2018.
Povich, Elaine S. 2023. “Plagued by Teacher Shortages, Some States Turn to Fast-Track Credentialing.” Stateline, July 24, 2023.
