Do Professors Compare Current Semester Code To Past?

Here’s a deep dive into whether or not professors compare current semester code to past submissions. Discover the practices and technologies utilized to ensure academic integrity at COMPARE.EDU.VN. We will explore the measures implemented, the role of similarity detection software, and ethical considerations surrounding these practices. This includes plagiarism detection, academic dishonesty, and code comparison tools.

1. Understanding the Landscape of Academic Integrity

The question “Do Professors Compare Current Semester Code To Past?” touches on the broader issue of academic integrity in computer science education. Maintaining this integrity is vital for ensuring that students genuinely learn and understand the material, fostering a fair learning environment, and upholding the reputation of academic institutions. Let’s delve into the core aspects of academic integrity and its relevance in coding assignments.

1.1. The Importance of Academic Integrity in Computer Science

Academic integrity, in the context of computer science, extends beyond simply avoiding plagiarism. It involves:

Original Work: Submitting code that is genuinely the student’s own creation, reflecting their understanding and effort.
Proper Attribution: Correctly citing any external sources, libraries, or code snippets used in the assignment.
Collaboration Boundaries: Adhering to the specific guidelines set by the professor regarding collaboration with other students. Some assignments may encourage collaboration, while others require individual work.
Honest Testing: Completing exams and quizzes without unauthorized assistance, demonstrating true knowledge of the subject matter.

Failing to maintain academic integrity can have serious consequences, ranging from failing grades on assignments to expulsion from the university. More importantly, it undermines the student’s learning process and future career prospects. A computer science professional must be able to create innovative and original solutions.

1.2. Common Challenges to Academic Integrity in Coding Assignments

Several factors contribute to the challenges of maintaining academic integrity in coding assignments:

Accessibility of Code: Code is readily available online through various sources, including open-source repositories, tutorial websites, and code-sharing platforms. This makes it tempting for students to copy and paste code without understanding it.
Pressure to Perform: Students may feel pressured to achieve high grades, leading them to seek shortcuts and engage in academic dishonesty.
Difficulty in Detecting Plagiarism: Identifying plagiarism in code can be more complex than in written assignments. Code can be modified, refactored, or paraphrased to mask its origin.
Collaboration Misunderstandings: Students may misunderstand the boundaries of acceptable collaboration, leading to unintentional violations of academic integrity.
Contract Cheating: The rise of online services that offer to complete assignments for students poses a significant threat to academic integrity.

1.3. The Role of Professors in Upholding Academic Integrity

Professors play a crucial role in upholding academic integrity by:

Clearly Defining Expectations: Providing clear and specific guidelines on what constitutes acceptable and unacceptable behavior in coding assignments.
Designing Original Assignments: Creating assignments that are challenging, engaging, and less susceptible to plagiarism.
Educating Students: Explicitly teaching students about academic integrity and the consequences of violating it.
Implementing Detection Measures: Utilizing various tools and techniques to detect plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty.
Enforcing Policies: Consistently and fairly enforcing academic integrity policies to deter violations and maintain a level playing field.

By proactively addressing these challenges and fulfilling their role, professors can foster a culture of academic integrity in their courses, promoting genuine learning and ethical conduct among students. At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we believe that this proactive approach is key to ensuring a fair and valuable educational experience for everyone.

2. Techniques Used by Professors to Compare Code

Professors employ a variety of techniques to compare current semester code to past submissions and identify potential cases of academic dishonesty. These techniques range from manual inspection to the use of sophisticated software tools.

2.1. Manual Code Review

Purpose: To identify similarities in code structure, logic, and variable names that may indicate plagiarism.
Process: Professors may manually review code submissions, comparing them to past submissions from the same course, solutions found online, or code from other sources.
Effectiveness: Effective for detecting blatant cases of plagiarism or code that has been copied with minimal modification. However, it can be time-consuming and less effective for detecting subtle forms of plagiarism.
Limitations: Highly dependent on the professor’s familiarity with the code and their ability to spot similarities. It is also prone to human error and bias.

2.2. Code Similarity Detection Software

Purpose: To automatically compare code submissions and identify sections that are similar to each other or to code from external sources.
Examples: Moss (Measure of Software Similarity), JPlag, Turnitin, and Codequiry.
Process: The software analyzes code submissions, breaks them down into smaller units (e.g., tokens, lines, or abstract syntax trees), and compares these units to identify similarities.
Effectiveness: More efficient and objective than manual code review. Can detect subtle forms of plagiarism, such as code that has been refactored or paraphrased.
Limitations: Can produce false positives, especially in cases where code is similar due to common programming practices or the use of standard libraries. Requires careful interpretation of the results.

2.3. Behavioral Analysis

Purpose: To identify patterns in student behavior that may indicate academic dishonesty.
Examples: Analyzing code submission times, frequency of submissions, and patterns of code modification.
Process: Professors may track student activity on the course website or learning management system to identify unusual patterns. For example, a student who suddenly submits a large amount of code shortly before the deadline may be suspected of plagiarism.
Effectiveness: Can provide circumstantial evidence of academic dishonesty, but it is not conclusive on its own.
Limitations: Requires careful interpretation and should be used in conjunction with other detection methods.

2.4. Code Autograders

Purpose: To automatically evaluate code submissions and provide feedback to students.
Process: Students submit their code to the autograder, which runs it against a set of test cases. The autograder then provides feedback on the code’s correctness, efficiency, and style.
Benefits for Academic Integrity: Autograders can help deter plagiarism by providing students with immediate feedback on their code, encouraging them to learn from their mistakes and submit original work. They can also help professors identify code that is not working correctly, which may be a sign of plagiarism.
Limitations: Autograders can only detect functional correctness and may not be able to detect plagiarism if the code is functionally correct but copied from another source.

By combining these techniques, professors can create a comprehensive approach to detecting and preventing academic dishonesty in coding assignments. It is important to note that the goal is not just to catch students who are cheating, but also to create a learning environment that promotes academic integrity and ethical behavior. COMPARE.EDU.VN encourages educators and students alike to embrace these practices for a more trustworthy and effective education.

3. How Code Similarity Detection Software Works

Code similarity detection software plays a crucial role in helping professors compare current semester code to past submissions. These tools use sophisticated algorithms to identify similarities between code submissions, even when the code has been modified or obfuscated. Understanding how these tools work can help students avoid unintentional plagiarism and help professors interpret the results more accurately.

3.1. Tokenization and Lexical Analysis

Process: The software first breaks down the code into a stream of tokens, which are the basic building blocks of the programming language (e.g., keywords, identifiers, operators, and literals). This process is called tokenization or lexical analysis.
Example: In the code snippet int x = y + 5;, the tokens would be int, x, =, y, +, 5, and ;.
Purpose: To simplify the code and make it easier to compare. Tokenization removes irrelevant details, such as whitespace and comments.

3.2. Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) Comparison

Process: The software parses the code and creates an abstract syntax tree (AST), which represents the structure of the code in a hierarchical format. The AST is then compared to the ASTs of other code submissions.
Example: An AST for the code x = y + 5; would show that x is being assigned the result of adding y and 5.
Purpose: To detect plagiarism even when the code has been refactored or modified. AST comparison focuses on the underlying structure of the code, rather than the specific syntax.

3.3. Fingerprinting and Hashing

Process: The software generates fingerprints or hash values for different parts of the code. These fingerprints are then compared to identify similar code segments.
Example: The software might generate a hash value for each line of code or for each block of code.
Purpose: To quickly identify potential cases of plagiarism. Fingerprinting and hashing are computationally efficient and can be used to compare large numbers of code submissions.

3.4. Sequence Alignment

Process: The software aligns the code sequences and identifies the longest common subsequences. This technique is often used in bioinformatics to compare DNA sequences.
Example: If two code submissions have the same sequence of statements, the sequence alignment algorithm will identify this similarity.
Purpose: To detect plagiarism even when the code has been reordered or modified. Sequence alignment can identify similarities even when the code is not identical.

3.5. Plagiarism Detection Algorithms

Winnowing: Selects a subset of fingerprints from each document to compare, reducing the computational cost.
Greedy String Tiling (GST): Identifies the longest matching strings between two documents.
Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA): Uses singular value decomposition to identify semantic similarities between documents.

By using these algorithms, code similarity detection software can effectively identify plagiarism in a variety of forms. However, it is important to remember that these tools are not perfect and can produce false positives. Professors should always carefully review the results and consider the context before making a judgment about academic dishonesty. COMPARE.EDU.VN encourages students to understand these processes to ensure the originality of their work and uphold academic integrity.

4. Ethical Considerations When Comparing Student Code

While comparing student code is essential for maintaining academic integrity, it also raises ethical considerations that professors must address. It’s crucial to strike a balance between detecting plagiarism and respecting student privacy, fostering trust, and promoting a fair learning environment.

4.1. Transparency and Disclosure

Importance: Students should be informed about the methods used to detect plagiarism in the course syllabus or at the beginning of the semester.
Benefits: Transparency helps students understand the expectations for academic integrity and reduces the likelihood of unintentional plagiarism. It also fosters trust between students and professors.
Example: “In this course, we will use code similarity detection software to check your submissions for plagiarism. The software compares your code to past submissions, online sources, and other student submissions. The results of this analysis will be used to identify potential cases of academic dishonesty.”

4.2. Data Privacy and Security

Importance: Student code may contain personal information or sensitive data. Professors must take steps to protect student privacy and ensure the security of their code.
Guidelines: Follow institutional policies and legal requirements regarding data privacy. Use secure methods for storing and transmitting student code. Limit access to student code to authorized personnel.
Example: “Your code submissions will be stored on a secure server and will only be accessed by the professor and teaching assistants for the purpose of grading and detecting plagiarism. We will not share your code with any third parties.”

4.3. Avoiding False Accusations

Importance: Code similarity detection software can produce false positives. Professors must carefully review the results and consider the context before accusing a student of plagiarism.
Best Practices: Investigate potential cases of plagiarism thoroughly. Give students the opportunity to explain their code. Consider factors such as the complexity of the assignment, the student’s prior performance, and the availability of online resources.
Example: “Before accusing a student of plagiarism, I will carefully review the code similarity detection results, examine the student’s code for evidence of original work, and give the student an opportunity to explain their code. I will also consult with other faculty members if necessary.”

4.4. Promoting a Culture of Trust

Importance: A culture of trust is essential for fostering academic integrity. Professors should create a learning environment where students feel comfortable asking for help and admitting mistakes.
Strategies: Encourage collaboration and teamwork. Provide students with ample opportunities to practice and receive feedback. Emphasize the importance of learning over grades.
Example: “I encourage you to collaborate with your classmates on the assignments, but please make sure that you are submitting your own original work. If you are struggling with the material, please come to my office hours or ask for help from the teaching assistants. I am here to help you succeed.”

4.5. Fair and Consistent Enforcement

Importance: Academic integrity policies should be enforced fairly and consistently. This helps to create a level playing field for all students and deter academic dishonesty.
Guidelines: Apply the same standards to all students. Document all cases of academic dishonesty. Follow institutional policies and procedures for handling academic integrity violations.
Example: “I will apply the same standards for academic integrity to all students in the course. If I find evidence of academic dishonesty, I will follow the university’s policies and procedures for handling such violations.”

By carefully considering these ethical considerations, professors can use code comparison techniques effectively while maintaining student privacy, fostering trust, and promoting a fair learning environment. At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we believe that this ethical approach is crucial for ensuring that academic integrity is upheld in a responsible and respectful manner.

5. Addressing False Positives and Student Appeals

One of the significant challenges in using code similarity detection software is the potential for false positives. These occur when the software identifies similarities between code submissions that are not due to plagiarism, but rather to common programming practices, the use of standard libraries, or coincidental similarities. Addressing false positives and handling student appeals fairly is crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring justice in academic evaluations.

5.1. Understanding the Causes of False Positives

Common Programming Practices: Students may use similar coding patterns or algorithms to solve a problem, leading to similarities in their code.
Use of Standard Libraries: The use of standard libraries or APIs can result in identical code snippets across multiple submissions.
Similar Assignment Interpretation: If students interpret the assignment requirements in a similar way, their solutions may naturally have some overlap.
Code Templates or Examples: The professor may provide code templates or examples that students are expected to use, resulting in similarities in their code.

5.2. Strategies for Identifying False Positives

Manual Code Review: Carefully examine the code submissions to determine whether the similarities are due to plagiarism or to one of the factors listed above.
Contextual Analysis: Consider the context of the assignment, the student’s prior performance, and the availability of online resources.
Student Explanation: Give the student an opportunity to explain their code and provide evidence that it is their own work.
Consultation with Other Faculty: Consult with other faculty members or experts in the field to get a second opinion.

5.3. Steps for Handling Student Appeals

Listen to the Student: Give the student an opportunity to present their case and provide any evidence that supports their claim.
Review the Evidence: Carefully review the code similarity detection results, the student’s code, and any other relevant information.
Be Open-Minded: Be willing to reconsider your initial assessment if the student presents a convincing case.
Document the Process: Keep a detailed record of the investigation, including the evidence reviewed, the student’s explanation, and the final decision.
Follow Institutional Policies: Adhere to the university’s policies and procedures for handling academic integrity violations.

5.4. Providing Constructive Feedback

Focus on Learning: Even if a student is found to have committed plagiarism, the focus should be on helping them learn from their mistake.
Explain the Importance of Academic Integrity: Help the student understand why academic integrity is important and the consequences of violating it.
Offer Resources and Support: Provide the student with resources and support to help them improve their coding skills and avoid plagiarism in the future.
Be Empathetic: Remember that students may be feeling stressed, overwhelmed, or confused. Be empathetic and understanding in your interactions with them.

By following these guidelines, professors can address false positives and handle student appeals fairly and effectively. This helps to maintain trust, promote a fair learning environment, and ensure that academic integrity is upheld in a responsible and ethical manner. At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we advocate for these balanced approaches in education to foster both integrity and student success.

6. Designing Assignments to Deter Plagiarism

Preventing plagiarism is more effective than simply detecting it. By designing assignments that are less susceptible to plagiarism, professors can encourage students to submit original work and promote a culture of academic integrity. Here are some strategies for designing plagiarism-resistant assignments.

6.1. Emphasize Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving

Design assignments that require students to apply their knowledge and skills to solve complex problems. Avoid assignments that can be easily answered by copying and pasting information from online sources.
Encourage students to think critically about the material and to develop their own unique solutions. This will make it more difficult for them to plagiarize and will also help them learn more effectively.

6.2. Incorporate Real-World Scenarios

Base assignments on real-world scenarios or case studies. This will make the assignments more engaging and relevant to students’ lives.
Ask students to analyze data, solve problems, or make recommendations based on the scenario. This will require them to apply their knowledge and skills in a practical way.

6.3. Require Original Research and Data Collection

Ask students to conduct original research or collect their own data. This will make it more difficult for them to plagiarize, as they will need to generate their own content.
Provide guidance and support to help students conduct their research or data collection effectively.

6.4. Use Unique Datasets

Use datasets that are not readily available online. This will make it more difficult for students to find solutions to the assignment.
Create your own datasets or modify existing datasets to make them unique.

6.5. Implement Version Control Systems

Require students to use version control systems like Git for their coding assignments. This allows professors to track the evolution of the code and identify potential cases of plagiarism.
Version control systems provide a history of changes, making it easier to see if code has been copied from another source.

6.6. Personalize Assignments

Incorporate elements of personalization into the assignment. For example, ask students to write about their own experiences or to apply the concepts to their own lives.
This will make the assignment more meaningful to students and will also make it more difficult for them to plagiarize.

6.7. Encourage Code Explanation and Documentation

Require students to explain their code and provide documentation. This helps professors understand the student’s thought process and identify potential cases of plagiarism.
Well-documented code is also easier to grade and provides valuable feedback to students.

By implementing these strategies, professors can design assignments that deter plagiarism and promote a culture of academic integrity. At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we believe that these proactive measures are essential for creating a fair and valuable learning environment for all students.

7. The Role of Code Style and Complexity

The style and complexity of code can also be indicators of academic integrity. While students may use similar algorithms or logic, the way they write and structure their code can reveal whether it is their original work or copied from another source.

7.1. Code Style as an Indicator

Consistency: Original code typically exhibits a consistent style, including indentation, naming conventions, and commenting.
Idiosyncrasies: Each programmer has their own unique style and habits. Copied code may not align with the student’s usual style.
Complexity: Overly complex code, especially when the assignment is relatively simple, can be a red flag. Students may copy code that is more advanced than their current skill level.

7.2. Measuring Code Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity: Measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program. Higher complexity may indicate copied code.
Halstead Complexity Measures: Evaluates the difficulty of understanding and implementing code based on the number of operators and operands.
Lines of Code (LOC): While not a direct measure of complexity, a significant deviation from the expected LOC for the assignment can be an indicator.

7.3. Using Code Linters and Style Checkers

Automated Tools: Code linters and style checkers can automatically analyze code and identify inconsistencies in style.
Examples: ESLint for JavaScript, PyLint for Python, and Checkstyle for Java.
Benefits: These tools can help students improve their coding style and make it easier for professors to detect plagiarism.

7.4. Incorporating Style Grading

Allocate points for code style and documentation. This encourages students to write clean, well-documented code and provides an additional layer of assessment.
Provide feedback on code style to help students improve their programming skills.

7.5. Examples of Style Differences

Inconsistent Indentation: Copied code may have different indentation styles than the student’s original code.
Naming Conventions: Copied code may use different naming conventions for variables and functions.
Commenting: Copied code may lack comments or have comments that do not match the student’s understanding of the code.

By considering code style and complexity, professors can gain additional insights into the originality of student code. At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we encourage educators to use these metrics as part of a comprehensive approach to maintaining academic integrity.

8. Utilizing Learning Management Systems (LMS) Features

Learning Management Systems (LMS) offer a variety of features that can help professors compare current semester code to past submissions and manage academic integrity. These features can streamline the process of detecting plagiarism and provide valuable insights into student behavior.

8.1. Submission History and Version Tracking

LMS Features: Most LMS platforms track submission history, allowing professors to see when students submitted their assignments and how many times they submitted.
Benefits: This can help identify students who submit their assignments at the last minute or who make frequent changes to their code shortly before the deadline, which may be a sign of plagiarism.

8.2. Plagiarism Detection Tools

Integrated Tools: Some LMS platforms have integrated plagiarism detection tools, such as Turnitin, that can automatically compare student submissions to a large database of online sources and past submissions.
Third-Party Integrations: LMS platforms also allow for integration with third-party plagiarism detection tools, such as Moss and JPlag.

8.3. Activity Monitoring and Analytics

LMS Features: LMS platforms track student activity, such as when they log in, which pages they view, and which resources they access.
Benefits: This can help identify students who are not actively engaged in the course or who are accessing suspicious resources, such as code-sharing websites.

8.4. Collaboration Tools

LMS Features: LMS platforms offer collaboration tools, such as discussion forums and group project spaces, that can help students work together on assignments.
Benefits: These tools can help prevent plagiarism by encouraging students to collaborate and learn from each other.

8.5. Exam Proctoring and Monitoring

LMS Features: Some LMS platforms offer exam proctoring and monitoring features that can help prevent cheating during online exams.
Benefits: These features can include webcam monitoring, screen sharing, and browser lockdown.

8.6. Gradebook Analytics

LMS Features: LMS platforms provide gradebook analytics that can help professors identify students who are struggling in the course or who have inconsistent grades.
Benefits: This can help identify students who may be tempted to cheat or plagiarize.

By utilizing these features, professors can create a more secure and transparent learning environment and promote academic integrity. At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we encourage educators to leverage LMS tools effectively to support both teaching and academic honesty.

9. The Future of Code Comparison and Academic Integrity

As technology evolves, so too will the methods for both creating and detecting plagiarism. Staying ahead of these changes is crucial for maintaining academic integrity in computer science education.

9.1. Advancements in AI and Machine Learning

AI-Powered Plagiarism Detection: AI and machine learning can be used to develop more sophisticated plagiarism detection tools that can identify even subtle forms of plagiarism, such as code that has been paraphrased or rewritten.
Code Generation Tools: AI-powered code generation tools can automatically generate code from natural language descriptions. This could make it easier for students to plagiarize, but it could also be used to create more original assignments.

9.2. Blockchain Technology

Decentralized Record Keeping: Blockchain technology can be used to create a decentralized record of student submissions, making it more difficult for students to tamper with their work.
Verification of Originality: Blockchain can also be used to verify the originality of code by creating a digital fingerprint of the code and storing it on the blockchain.

9.3. Biometric Authentication

Identity Verification: Biometric authentication, such as facial recognition and fingerprint scanning, can be used to verify the identity of students during online exams.
Prevention of Impersonation: This can help prevent students from having someone else take the exam for them.

9.4. Focus on Skills-Based Assessment

Shifting from Memorization to Application: Emphasizing skills-based assessment can reduce the incentive to plagiarize by focusing on the application of knowledge rather than memorization.
Project-Based Learning: Project-based learning can also help promote academic integrity by requiring students to create original projects that demonstrate their skills and knowledge.

9.5. Continuous Education and Awareness

Ongoing Training for Faculty: Providing ongoing training for faculty on the latest plagiarism detection techniques and ethical considerations.
Student Workshops on Academic Integrity: Conducting student workshops on academic integrity and the consequences of plagiarism.

By embracing these advancements and staying informed about the latest trends, professors can create a more robust and effective system for maintaining academic integrity in computer science education. COMPARE.EDU.VN is dedicated to keeping educators and students informed about these developments to promote a future of honest and effective learning.

10. Conclusion: Fostering a Culture of Originality

The question of whether professors compare current semester code to past submissions is just one facet of a larger commitment to academic integrity. While tools and techniques for detecting plagiarism are essential, they are most effective when used in conjunction with strategies for preventing plagiarism and fostering a culture of originality.

By designing engaging assignments, educating students about academic integrity, and utilizing the features of learning management systems, professors can create a learning environment that promotes genuine learning and ethical behavior. The goal is not simply to catch students who are cheating, but to inspire them to create original work and develop their own unique skills and talents.

As technology continues to evolve, it is important for professors to stay informed about the latest trends and to adapt their teaching methods accordingly. By embracing new technologies and focusing on skills-based assessment, professors can create a more robust and effective system for maintaining academic integrity in computer science education.

At COMPARE.EDU.VN, we believe that academic integrity is essential for the success of students and the reputation of academic institutions. By providing resources and information on the latest trends and best practices, we hope to help create a future where all students have the opportunity to learn and grow in an environment of trust and honesty.

Are you looking for more comprehensive comparisons to aid your decisions? Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN today! Our detailed and objective comparisons across various topics will help you make informed choices. Whether you’re comparing educational programs, products, or services, we’ve got you covered.

Contact Us:

Address: 333 Comparison Plaza, Choice City, CA 90210, United States
WhatsApp: +1 (626) 555-9090
Website: COMPARE.EDU.VN

Let compare.edu.vn be your trusted resource for making smart decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What is code similarity detection software?
Code similarity detection software is a tool used to compare code submissions and identify sections that are similar to each other or to code from external sources, helping to detect plagiarism.

2. How does code similarity detection software work?
The software analyzes code by breaking it down into tokens, creating abstract syntax trees (ASTs), fingerprinting, and sequence alignment to identify similarities.

3. Can code similarity detection software produce false positives?
Yes, false positives can occur due to common programming practices, the use of standard libraries, or coincidental similarities.

4. What should I do if I am accused of plagiarism based on code similarity detection results?
You should present your case, provide evidence of your original work, and explain your coding process to demonstrate the originality of your submission.

5. What are some strategies for designing assignments that deter plagiarism?
Strategies include emphasizing critical thinking, incorporating real-world scenarios, requiring original research, using unique datasets, and personalizing assignments.

6. How important is code style in detecting plagiarism?
Code style can be an indicator, as original code typically exhibits a consistent style, while copied code may not align with the student’s usual style.

7. What features of Learning Management Systems (LMS) can help detect plagiarism?
LMS features such as submission history, plagiarism detection tools, activity monitoring, and collaboration tools can aid in detecting plagiarism.

8. How can AI and machine learning be used to detect plagiarism in the future?
AI can power more sophisticated plagiarism detection tools that identify subtle forms of plagiarism, such as paraphrased or rewritten code.

9. What are the ethical considerations when comparing student code?
Ethical considerations include transparency, data privacy, avoiding false accusations, promoting trust, and ensuring fair and consistent enforcement of academic integrity policies.

10. How can professors address false positives and handle student appeals fairly?
Professors can address false positives by carefully reviewing code, considering context, listening to student explanations, and documenting the investigation process. They should be open-minded and follow institutional policies.