Compare Subaru Outback Vs Forester: Which SUV Is Right For You?

The Subaru Outback vs Forester comparison reveals two excellent SUVs, but choosing between them can be tricky. At compare.edu.vn, we provide a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision. By analyzing their features, performance, and practicality, we aim to simplify your selection process and guide you towards the perfect SUV that aligns with your lifestyle and needs. Consider factors like cargo space, fuel efficiency, and off-road capabilities to determine which Subaru best fits your requirements.

1. What Are The Key Differences Between The Subaru Outback And Forester?

The Subaru Outback and Forester differ significantly in body style, size, and target audience. The Outback is a wagon-like SUV offering a longer wheelbase and enhanced cargo capacity, while the Forester is a traditional SUV with a more upright design, emphasizing passenger space and visibility.

Body Style and Design: The Subaru Outback adopts a wagon-style design with a longer and lower profile, blending SUV and wagon characteristics. This design gives it a sleeker look and improved aerodynamics compared to the more traditional SUV shape of the Forester. The Forester, on the other hand, stands taller with a boxier design, optimizing interior space and providing better headroom.
Size and Dimensions: The Outback is typically longer and wider than the Forester, contributing to its increased cargo capacity. For example, the 2024 Subaru Outback has a length of 191.9 inches, while the 2024 Subaru Forester measures 182.9 inches. This difference in size impacts maneuverability, with the Forester often being easier to navigate in tight spaces and urban environments.
Target Audience: The Outback appeals to those needing extra cargo space for outdoor adventures and long trips, while the Forester targets families and individuals prioritizing passenger comfort and ease of entry and exit. According to Subaru’s market research, Outback buyers often engage in activities like camping, hiking, and kayaking, requiring ample storage for gear. Forester buyers, conversely, value safety features, higher seating positions, and overall practicality for daily commutes and family errands.
Interior Space and Comfort: The Forester excels in providing a spacious cabin with ample headroom and comfortable seating for all passengers. The upright design contributes to a more airy feel. The Outback, with its longer wheelbase, offers generous legroom and a more luxurious interior, especially in higher trims. It provides a more car-like driving experience with comfortable seating for long journeys.
Cargo Capacity: The Outback generally offers more cargo space behind the rear seats compared to the Forester, making it ideal for those who frequently carry large items. With the rear seats up, the Outback provides around 32.6 cubic feet of cargo space, whereas the Forester offers about 28.9 cubic feet. When the rear seats are folded down, the Outback expands to approximately 75.7 cubic feet, while the Forester reaches about 69.1 cubic feet.
Driving Experience: The Outback provides a smoother, more comfortable ride, suitable for long highway trips, while the Forester offers a more agile and responsive driving experience, making it better for city driving. The Outback’s longer wheelbase contributes to better stability and ride quality on highways, while the Forester’s compact dimensions allow for easier maneuvering in urban settings.
Off-Road Capabilities: Both vehicles come standard with Subaru’s Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, offering excellent traction in various conditions. The Outback, especially in its Wilderness trim, has increased ground clearance and enhanced off-road features, making it more capable on challenging terrains. The Forester also offers decent off-road capabilities, suitable for light trails and unpaved roads.
Fuel Efficiency: The Forester typically achieves slightly better fuel economy than the Outback due to its smaller size and lighter weight. According to EPA estimates, the Forester achieves around 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, while the Outback gets approximately 26 mpg in the city and 32 mpg on the highway with its standard engine.
Pricing: The Forester generally has a lower starting price than the Outback, making it a more budget-friendly option for those looking for a capable and reliable SUV. The 2024 Subaru Forester starts at around $27,095, while the 2024 Subaru Outback starts at approximately $28,895. Pricing can vary based on trim levels and optional features.
Features and Technology: Both models offer a range of features and technology, including advanced safety systems, infotainment options, and driver-assistance technologies. The Outback often includes more premium features in its higher trims, such as leather upholstery, advanced infotainment systems, and more sophisticated safety technologies.
Resale Value: Both the Outback and Forester hold their value well, reflecting Subaru’s reputation for reliability and durability. According to Kelley Blue Book, both models consistently rank high in resale value compared to other vehicles in their respective classes.

In summary, the Subaru Outback is ideal for those needing more cargo space and a comfortable ride for long trips, while the Forester is better suited for families and individuals prioritizing passenger space and ease of driving in urban environments. Both offer excellent safety features, reliability, and standard all-wheel drive, making them popular choices in the SUV market.

2. How Do The Engine Options And Performance Compare In The Outback And Forester?

Engine options and performance differ significantly between the Subaru Outback and Forester, influencing their driving dynamics and suitability for various needs. The Outback offers more powerful engine choices, providing enhanced acceleration and towing capabilities compared to the Forester’s more economical engine.

Engine Options: The Subaru Outback offers a choice between a standard 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and an optional turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine, providing more power and performance. The Forester primarily comes with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine.
Horsepower and Torque: The base 2.5-liter engine in the Outback produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque, while the optional turbocharged engine delivers 260 horsepower and 277 lb-ft of torque. The Forester’s 2.5-liter engine generates 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque.
Acceleration: The Outback with the turbocharged engine accelerates much faster than the Forester. According to Car and Driver testing, the Outback with the turbo engine achieves 0-60 mph in approximately 5.8 seconds, while the Forester takes around 8.5 seconds.
Towing Capacity: The Outback offers a higher towing capacity, especially with the turbocharged engine, making it suitable for towing trailers or small boats. The Outback with the standard engine can tow up to 2,700 lbs, while the turbocharged version can tow up to 3,500 lbs. The Forester’s towing capacity is limited to 1,500 lbs.
Fuel Efficiency: The Forester typically provides slightly better fuel economy due to its lighter weight and smaller engine. The EPA estimates the Forester gets 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, while the Outback with the base engine achieves 26 mpg in the city and 32 mpg on the highway. The turbocharged Outback has lower fuel economy, estimated at 23 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
Transmission: Both models use a continuously variable transmission (CVT), which helps optimize fuel efficiency and provides smooth acceleration. The CVT in the Outback is tuned to handle the higher torque output of the turbocharged engine, offering enhanced durability and performance.
Driving Dynamics: The Outback delivers a more refined and comfortable driving experience, particularly on long highway drives, while the Forester offers a more agile and responsive feel, ideal for city driving and winding roads. The Outback’s longer wheelbase and available turbocharged engine contribute to a smoother ride and confident passing power.
Off-Road Performance: Both vehicles come standard with Subaru’s Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, providing excellent traction in various conditions. The Outback Wilderness trim offers increased ground clearance and enhanced off-road features, making it more capable on challenging terrains compared to the Forester.
Engine Noise and Refinement: The Outback, especially with the turbocharged engine, generally offers a quieter and more refined driving experience compared to the Forester. The Forester’s engine can be noisier under hard acceleration, whereas the Outback’s turbo engine provides smoother and more responsive power delivery.
Maintenance and Reliability: Both Subaru models are known for their reliability, but the Outback’s turbocharged engine may require more frequent maintenance compared to the Forester’s naturally aspirated engine. Regular maintenance, such as oil changes and inspections, is crucial for both vehicles to ensure longevity and optimal performance.

In summary, if you prioritize power and towing capability, the Subaru Outback with the turbocharged engine is the better choice. If you value fuel efficiency and a more nimble driving experience, the Forester is a more suitable option. Both vehicles offer reliable performance and come standard with all-wheel drive, making them excellent choices for various driving conditions.

3. Which Model Offers More Cargo Space: Outback Or Forester?

The Subaru Outback generally offers more cargo space than the Forester, making it a preferred choice for individuals and families who frequently need to transport large items. The Outback’s design and dimensions contribute to its superior cargo capacity, enhancing its practicality for various needs.

Cargo Space Behind Rear Seats: The Outback provides approximately 32.6 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats, whereas the Forester offers about 28.9 cubic feet. This difference is significant for everyday use, allowing the Outback to accommodate more luggage, groceries, or sports equipment without folding down the rear seats.
Cargo Space With Rear Seats Folded: When the rear seats are folded down, the Outback’s cargo space expands to approximately 75.7 cubic feet, while the Forester reaches about 69.1 cubic feet. This additional space in the Outback is beneficial for transporting larger items such as furniture, camping gear, or bicycles.
Usability of Cargo Area: The Outback’s longer cargo area makes it easier to load and unload longer items compared to the Forester. The Outback’s lower cargo floor can also be an advantage for lifting heavy items. The Forester, with its boxier shape, provides a more upright cargo area, which can be useful for stacking items vertically.
Design and Layout: The Outback’s wagon-like design contributes to its larger cargo capacity. The Forester, with its more traditional SUV shape, has a shorter rear overhang, which reduces its overall cargo volume. The layout of the cargo area in both models is functional, but the Outback’s larger dimensions provide a clear advantage.
Additional Storage Features: Both models offer additional storage features such as under-floor storage compartments and cargo nets to help organize and secure items. The Outback often includes more tie-down points and cargo hooks, enhancing its utility for carrying various types of cargo.
Real-World Scenarios: In real-world scenarios, the Outback’s larger cargo capacity makes it better suited for activities like road trips, camping, and transporting sports equipment. For example, a family of four heading out on a camping trip might find the Outback more suitable for carrying tents, sleeping bags, and cooking equipment. The Forester is adequate for smaller families or individuals who need to carry groceries, luggage for weekend getaways, or everyday items.
Third-Party Testing: Independent tests conducted by automotive publications consistently show that the Outback offers more usable cargo space than the Forester. These tests involve measuring the cargo area with standardized equipment and simulating real-world loading scenarios.
User Reviews: User reviews and owner testimonials often highlight the Outback’s superior cargo capacity as a key advantage. Many Outback owners appreciate the ability to transport large items without needing to use a roof rack or trailer.
Impact on Passenger Comfort: While the Outback offers more cargo space, the Forester provides ample passenger room, making it comfortable for families with children. The Forester’s upright design ensures plenty of headroom and legroom for all occupants.

In summary, the Subaru Outback is the better choice if cargo space is a primary concern. Its larger cargo area, both behind the rear seats and with the seats folded down, provides more flexibility for transporting a variety of items. The Forester remains a practical option for those who prioritize passenger comfort and a more compact size, but it offers less cargo capacity compared to the Outback.

4. How Do The Safety Features Compare Between The Subaru Outback And Forester?

The Subaru Outback and Forester both come equipped with a comprehensive suite of safety features, reflecting Subaru’s commitment to safety. While both models share many standard safety technologies, there are some differences in advanced features and performance.

Standard Safety Features: Both the Subaru Outback and Forester include standard safety features such as:
- Subaru’s EyeSight Driver Assist Technology: This includes adaptive cruise control, pre-collision braking, lane departure and sway warning, and lane keep assist.
- Anti-lock Braking System (ABS): Prevents wheel lock-up during hard braking.
- Vehicle Dynamics Control (VDC): Enhances stability by monitoring and adjusting braking and engine output.
- Traction Control System (TCS): Limits wheel spin on slippery surfaces.
- Airbag System: Includes front, side, and curtain airbags to protect occupants in the event of a collision.
- Rearview Camera: Provides a view of the area behind the vehicle when backing up.
Advanced Safety Technologies:
- Blind-Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist and Rear Cross-Traffic Alert: Available on both models, these systems use sensors to monitor blind spots and alert the driver to potential hazards.
- Reverse Automatic Braking (RAB): Available on higher trims, this system can automatically apply the brakes when reversing to avoid a collision.
- DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System: Available on select trims, this system uses a camera to monitor the driver’s attention level and provides alerts if drowsiness or distraction is detected.
- High Beam Assist: Automatically switches between high and low beams based on oncoming traffic.
Crash Test Ratings: Both the Subaru Outback and Forester consistently receive high marks in crash tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
- IIHS: Both models have earned the Top Safety Pick+ designation from the IIHS, indicating excellent performance in crash tests and advanced safety features.
- NHTSA: Both models have received 5-star overall safety ratings from the NHTSA, demonstrating their ability to protect occupants in a variety of crash scenarios.
Specific Safety Advantages:
- Outback: The Outback’s longer wheelbase and larger size may provide slightly better protection in certain types of collisions. The DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System is more widely available on Outback trims.
- Forester: The Forester’s taller seating position provides enhanced visibility, helping drivers spot potential hazards earlier. The Forester’s design also includes optimized crumple zones to absorb impact energy.
Real-World Performance: In real-world driving scenarios, both the Outback and Forester’s safety features work effectively to prevent accidents and mitigate injuries. The EyeSight system, in particular, has been praised for its ability to reduce the risk of frontal collisions.
User Feedback: Owners of both models frequently commend the effectiveness of the safety features, noting that they provide added peace of mind and confidence behind the wheel. The adaptive cruise control and lane keep assist systems are particularly appreciated for their ability to reduce driver fatigue on long trips.
Future Safety Innovations: Subaru continues to innovate and introduce new safety technologies in its vehicles. Future models may include enhanced versions of the EyeSight system, more advanced driver-assistance features, and improved crash protection designs.

In summary, both the Subaru Outback and Forester offer exceptional safety features and performance. The choice between the two may come down to specific preferences, such as the Outback’s available DriverFocus system or the Forester’s enhanced visibility. Both models are excellent choices for those prioritizing safety in their vehicle purchase.

5. How Does The Interior Comfort And Design Differ Between These Subarus?

The interior comfort and design of the Subaru Outback and Forester cater to different preferences and needs. The Outback offers a more premium and car-like interior, while the Forester emphasizes practicality and spaciousness.

Overall Interior Design:
- Outback: The Outback features a more upscale interior design with higher-quality materials and a more refined aesthetic. The dashboard layout is modern and incorporates a large touchscreen infotainment system.
- Forester: The Forester’s interior is more functional and straightforward, with a focus on maximizing space and visibility. The dashboard design is simple and user-friendly, with easy-to-reach controls.
Seating Comfort and Materials:
- Outback: The Outback’s seats are typically more sculpted and supportive, providing enhanced comfort for long drives. Higher trims offer leather upholstery and power-adjustable seats with memory function.
- Forester: The Forester’s seats are comfortable and supportive, with durable cloth upholstery as standard. Higher trims offer leather or premium cloth options.
Passenger Space:
- Outback: The Outback offers generous legroom and shoulder room for both front and rear passengers. The longer wheelbase contributes to a more spacious feel, particularly in the rear seats.
- Forester: The Forester provides excellent headroom and legroom, thanks to its boxier design. The rear seats are particularly spacious, making it comfortable for adults and children alike.
Visibility:
- Outback: The Outback’s lower profile can result in slightly reduced visibility compared to the Forester. However, the large windows and available blind-spot monitoring system help to mitigate this issue.
- Forester: The Forester excels in providing excellent visibility, thanks to its tall windows and upright seating position. The large glass area provides a clear view of the road and surroundings.
Infotainment and Technology:
- Outback: The Outback features a standard 11.6-inch touchscreen infotainment system (on most trims) that integrates audio, climate, and vehicle settings. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility are standard.
- Forester: The Forester comes with a 6.5-inch or 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system, depending on the trim. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility are also standard.
Noise Levels:
- Outback: The Outback generally offers a quieter cabin compared to the Forester, thanks to improved sound insulation and a more refined engine.
- Forester: The Forester’s cabin can be noisier, particularly at highway speeds, due to wind and road noise.
Interior Features:
- Outback: The Outback offers a range of premium features, such as a power moonroof, heated seats, a Harman Kardon audio system, and a hands-free power liftgate.
- Forester: The Forester also offers desirable features, such as a panoramic moonroof, heated seats, and a power liftgate, but it generally lacks the same level of luxury as the Outback.
User Reviews:
- Outback: Owners often praise the Outback’s comfortable seats, upscale interior, and advanced technology features.
- Forester: Owners appreciate the Forester’s spacious cabin, excellent visibility, and user-friendly design.

In summary, the Subaru Outback is the better choice for those seeking a more premium and comfortable interior with advanced technology features. The Forester, on the other hand, is ideal for those prioritizing spaciousness, visibility, and practicality. Both models offer excellent comfort and design elements, but they cater to different preferences and needs.

6. How Do The Trim Levels And Pricing Compare For The Outback And Forester?

The Subaru Outback and Forester offer various trim levels and pricing options to cater to different budgets and preferences. The Forester generally starts at a lower price point, while the Outback offers more premium features in its higher trims.

Starting Price: The Subaru Forester typically has a lower starting price compared to the Outback. The 2024 Subaru Forester starts at around $27,095, while the 2024 Subaru Outback starts at approximately $28,895.
Trim Levels for the Subaru Outback:
- Base: Includes standard features such as Subaru’s EyeSight Driver Assist Technology, dual 7.0-inch touchscreens, and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto compatibility.
- Premium: Adds features such as an 11.6-inch touchscreen, heated front seats, and a power-adjustable driver’s seat.
- Onyx Edition: Features black exterior trim, water-repellent upholstery, and a dual-mode X-Mode system for enhanced off-road capability.
- Limited: Offers leather upholstery, a Harman Kardon audio system, and blind-spot detection with lane change assist and rear cross-traffic alert.
- Touring: Includes all the features of the Limited trim, plus a DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System, ventilated front seats, and Nappa leather upholstery.
- Wilderness: Designed for off-road enthusiasts, featuring increased ground clearance, all-terrain tires, and rugged styling.
Trim Levels for the Subaru Forester:
- Base: Includes standard features such as Subaru’s EyeSight Driver Assist Technology, a 6.5-inch touchscreen, and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto compatibility.
- Premium: Adds features such as a panoramic moonroof, alloy wheels, and heated front seats.
- Sport: Features unique styling elements, such as orange accents, and adds features like a sport-tuned suspension and a dual-mode X-Mode system.
- Limited: Offers leather upholstery, a power liftgate, and blind-spot detection with lane change assist and rear cross-traffic alert.
- Touring: Includes all the features of the Limited trim, plus a DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System, heated rear seats, and a Harman Kardon audio system.
- Wilderness: Similar to the Outback Wilderness, this trim offers increased ground clearance, all-terrain tires, and rugged styling for enhanced off-road capability.
Pricing by Trim Level:
- Subaru Outback:
  - Base: $28,895
  - Premium: $31,195
  - Onyx Edition: $36,995
  - Limited: $35,795
  - Touring: $40,645
  - Wilderness: $39,960
- Subaru Forester:
  - Base: $27,095
  - Premium: $30,095
  - Sport: $31,665
  - Limited: $33,975
  - Touring: $37,095
  - Wilderness: $34,720
Value for Money: The Forester offers excellent value for money, particularly in its lower trims, making it an affordable choice for budget-conscious buyers. The Outback provides more premium features and a more upscale experience in its higher trims, justifying its higher price tag.
Popular Trim Choices:
- Outback: The Premium and Limited trims are popular choices, offering a balance of features and value.
- Forester: The Premium and Sport trims are commonly selected, providing desirable features without breaking the bank.
Long-Term Cost of Ownership: Both models have a good reputation for reliability, which helps to keep long-term ownership costs down. Factors such as fuel efficiency, maintenance costs, and insurance rates should be considered when evaluating the overall cost of ownership.

In summary, the Subaru Forester is the more affordable option, particularly for those looking at the base and mid-level trims. The Outback, while more expensive, offers more premium features and a more upscale experience, especially in its higher trims. The choice between the two depends on individual priorities and budget constraints.

7. How Do The Outback And Forester Compare In Terms Of Fuel Efficiency?

The Subaru Outback and Forester offer competitive fuel efficiency, but the Forester generally provides slightly better mileage due to its smaller size and lighter weight. Understanding these differences can help buyers make an informed decision based on their driving habits and priorities.

EPA Estimates: According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Subaru Forester achieves slightly better fuel economy than the Outback.
- Forester: The Forester is rated at 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway, with a combined rating of 29 mpg.
- Outback: The Outback with the standard 2.5-liter engine is rated at 26 mpg in the city and 32 mpg on the highway, with a combined rating of 28 mpg. The Outback with the optional turbocharged 2.4-liter engine has lower fuel economy, rated at 23 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway, with a combined rating of 26 mpg.
Real-World Fuel Economy: Real-world fuel economy can vary depending on driving conditions, habits, and maintenance. However, independent tests and user reviews generally confirm that the Forester achieves slightly better mileage than the Outback.
Factors Affecting Fuel Efficiency:
- Engine Size and Type: The Forester comes standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, while the Outback offers a choice between a 2.5-liter engine and a turbocharged 2.4-liter engine. The smaller engine in the Forester contributes to its better fuel economy.
- Weight: The Forester is lighter than the Outback, which also contributes to its improved fuel efficiency.
- Aerodynamics: The Outback’s wagon-like design gives it a slightly more aerodynamic profile than the Forester, but this advantage is offset by its larger size and weight.
- Transmission: Both models use a continuously variable transmission (CVT), which helps to optimize fuel efficiency by keeping the engine in its most efficient operating range.
Driving Conditions: Fuel efficiency can vary significantly depending on driving conditions. City driving, with frequent stops and starts, tends to reduce fuel economy compared to highway driving.
Long-Term Fuel Costs: Over the long term, the slightly better fuel economy of the Forester can result in significant savings, particularly for drivers who log a lot of miles.
Fuel Efficiency Technologies: Both models incorporate various technologies to improve fuel efficiency, such as direct injection, variable valve timing, and aerodynamic enhancements.
User Reviews: Owners of both models often report satisfaction with their fuel economy, but Forester owners tend to highlight the vehicle’s efficiency as a key advantage.
Impact on Vehicle Choice: For buyers prioritizing fuel efficiency, the Forester is the more logical choice. However, those who need the extra power and cargo capacity of the Outback may be willing to sacrifice a small amount of fuel economy.

In summary, the Subaru Forester offers slightly better fuel efficiency compared to the Outback, making it a more economical choice for drivers who prioritize mileage. The Outback, particularly with the turbocharged engine, provides more power and performance but at the expense of fuel economy.

8. How Do The Off-Road Capabilities Stack Up In The Outback Versus The Forester?

The Subaru Outback and Forester are both capable off-road vehicles, thanks to Subaru’s standard Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system. However, the Outback, particularly in its Wilderness trim, offers enhanced off-road capabilities compared to the Forester.

Standard All-Wheel Drive: Both the Subaru Outback and Forester come standard with Subaru’s Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system, which provides excellent traction in a variety of conditions, including snow, mud, and gravel.
Ground Clearance: Ground clearance is a key factor in off-road capability. The Outback Wilderness trim offers 9.5 inches of ground clearance, while the standard Outback has 8.7 inches. The Forester provides 8.7 inches of ground clearance in all trims.
X-Mode: Both models offer Subaru’s X-Mode system, which optimizes the vehicle’s all-wheel-drive system, engine output, and braking to provide enhanced traction on slippery surfaces.
Approach and Departure Angles: The Outback Wilderness has better approach and departure angles compared to the standard Outback and the Forester, allowing it to navigate more challenging terrain without scraping the bumpers.
Suspension and Handling: The Outback Wilderness features a revised suspension with longer travel, providing improved articulation and a smoother ride on rough roads. The Forester also offers a comfortable ride, but its suspension is not as optimized for off-road use.
Tires: The Outback Wilderness comes standard with all-terrain tires, which provide better grip on loose surfaces compared to the standard tires on the Outback and Forester.
Off-Road Features: The Outback Wilderness includes additional off-road features such as skid plates, a raised suspension, and unique styling elements that enhance its rugged appearance.
Real-World Performance: In real-world off-road scenarios, the Outback Wilderness is more capable than the Forester, thanks to its higher ground clearance, all-terrain tires, and revised suspension. The Forester can handle light off-roading, such as dirt roads and mild trails, but it is not as well-suited for more challenging terrain.
User Reviews: Owners of the Outback Wilderness often praise its off-road capabilities, noting that it can handle a variety of terrains with ease. Forester owners also appreciate the vehicle’s all-wheel-drive system, but acknowledge that it is not as capable as the Outback Wilderness on more challenging trails.
Comparison Table:

Feature	Subaru Outback Wilderness	Subaru Forester
Ground Clearance	9.5 inches	8.7 inches
All-Terrain Tires	Yes	No
Skid Plates	Yes	No
X-Mode	Dual-Mode	Single-Mode
Approach Angle	20.0 degrees	21.6 degrees
Departure Angle	23.6 degrees	25.8 degrees

In summary, both the Subaru Outback and Forester offer capable off-road performance, thanks to their standard all-wheel-drive systems. However, the Outback Wilderness is the more capable off-road vehicle, with its higher ground clearance, all-terrain tires, and revised suspension. The Forester is suitable for light off-roading, while the Outback Wilderness is better suited for more challenging terrain.

9. How Do The Technology Features Compare In The Subaru Outback And Forester?

The Subaru Outback and Forester both offer a range of technology features designed to enhance convenience, safety, and connectivity. While both models share many of the same technologies, there are some differences in their availability and implementation.

Infotainment Systems:
- Outback: The Outback features a standard 11.6-inch touchscreen infotainment system (on most trims), which integrates audio, climate, and vehicle settings. The system is user-friendly and responsive, with clear graphics and intuitive menus.
- Forester: The Forester comes with a 6.5-inch or 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system, depending on the trim. The system is also user-friendly, but the smaller screen size may be a drawback for some buyers.
Apple CarPlay and Android Auto: Both models offer standard Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, allowing drivers to seamlessly integrate their smartphones with the vehicle’s infotainment system.
Driver-Assistance Technologies:
- EyeSight Driver Assist Technology: Both the Subaru Outback and Forester include Subaru’s EyeSight Driver Assist Technology as standard equipment. This suite of safety features includes adaptive cruise control, pre-collision braking, lane departure and sway warning, and lane keep assist.
- Blind-Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist and Rear Cross-Traffic Alert: Available on both models, these systems use sensors to monitor blind spots and alert the driver to potential hazards.
- Reverse Automatic Braking (RAB): Available on higher trims, this system can automatically apply the brakes when reversing to avoid a collision.
- DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System: Available on select trims, this system uses a camera to monitor the driver’s attention level and provides alerts if drowsiness or distraction is detected.
Audio Systems:
- Outback: The Outback offers an optional Harman Kardon premium audio system, which provides excellent sound quality and clarity.
- Forester: The Forester also offers a Harman Kardon audio system, but it is not as widely available as in the Outback.
Connectivity Features: Both models offer a range of connectivity features, such as Bluetooth, USB ports, and Wi-Fi hotspot capability.
Convenience Features: Both models offer a variety of convenience features, such as keyless entry, push-button start, and a power liftgate.
User Reviews: Owners of both models often praise the technology features, noting that they are easy to use and enhance the overall driving experience. The EyeSight system, in particular, is highly regarded for its effectiveness in preventing accidents.
Comparison Table:

Feature	Subaru Outback	Subaru Forester
Infotainment Screen Size	11.6-inch (most trims)	6.5-inch or 8-inch
Apple CarPlay and Android Auto	Standard	Standard
EyeSight Driver Assist Technology	Standard	Standard
Blind-Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist	Available	Available
Reverse Automatic Braking	Available	Available
DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System	Available	Available
Harman Kardon Audio System	Available	Available

In summary, both the Subaru Outback and Forester offer a range of technology features designed to enhance convenience, safety, and connectivity. The Outback generally offers more advanced technology features, such as the larger infotainment screen and the DriverFocus Distraction Mitigation System, but the Forester is still well-equipped and provides excellent value for money.

10. Which Subaru Is Better For Families: The Outback Or The Forester?

Deciding between the Subaru Outback and Forester for family use depends on specific needs and priorities. The Forester excels in providing a spacious cabin and excellent visibility, making it ideal for families prioritizing passenger comfort and ease of driving. The Outback, with its larger cargo capacity and more comfortable ride, is better suited for families who frequently take long trips and need ample storage space.

Passenger Space: The Subaru Forester offers slightly more headroom and a more upright seating position, which can be beneficial for families with taller members or those who prefer a more commanding view of the road. The Outback provides ample legroom and shoulder room, ensuring a comfortable ride for all passengers.
Cargo Space: The Outback offers more cargo space than the Forester, making it better suited for families who frequently need to transport large items such as strollers, sports equipment, or luggage. The Outback’s longer cargo area also makes it easier to load and unload bulky items.
Safety Features: Both models come standard with Subaru’s EyeSight Driver Assist Technology, which includes a range of safety features such as adaptive cruise control, pre-collision braking, and lane departure warning. Both models have also earned top safety ratings from the IIHS and NHTSA, making them excellent choices for families prioritizing safety.
Ease of Use: The Forester’s taller seating position and large windows make it easier to get in and out of, and provide excellent visibility for the driver. The Outback’s lower ride height may be more convenient for smaller children or elderly family members.
Fuel Efficiency: The Forester generally achieves slightly better fuel economy than the Outback, which can save families money on gas over the long term.
Price: The Forester typically has a lower starting price than the Outback, making it a more affordable option for families on a budget.
User Reviews: Families who own the Forester often praise its spacious cabin, excellent visibility, and user-friendly features. Outback owners appreciate the vehicle’s comfortable ride, large cargo capacity, and advanced technology features.
Comparison Table: