It’s a common notion that car enthusiasts prioritize the “fun to drive” factor when purchasing a vehicle. However, this perspective seems outdated and doesn’t accurately reflect the modern auto consumer’s priorities. For decades, the majority of car buyers haven’t been primarily focused on driving pleasure. When individuals compare cars side by side, for instance, considering a Honda Civic versus an Accord, or even a Honda Rav4, the choice isn’t typically about which model offers a more exhilarating driving experience. Instead, the decision hinges on practicality and needs.
The distinction between models like the Civic and Accord lies in their size and price. The Accord provides more passenger and cargo space but comes at a higher cost. These two models exist because consumers have varying needs and budgets, leading them to prioritize different aspects when they compare cars side by side.
The rise of SUVs further illustrates this point. SUVs have become increasingly popular, overshadowing not just station wagons but sedans as well. This shift isn’t driven by SUVs being more enjoyable to drive than sedans. Their appeal lies in their practicality, spaciousness, comfort, and versatility. The primary reason sedans haven’t been completely replaced by SUVs is simply economics; sedans generally remain more affordable. When people compare cars side by side, price is a major factor, and sedans often win in terms of cost-effectiveness.
To truly understand the diverse range of car models available, it’s crucial to move beyond the idea of “fun to drive.” The variety in the automotive market is fundamentally about balancing a vehicle’s intended use – passenger capacity, cargo volume, and comfort – with budget and size limitations. Unlike smaller devices like phones, a car’s size and shape are integral to its core functionality. This remains true even with advancements in autonomous driving technology.
Considering extremes, why isn’t everyone driving vans if they offer maximum passenger comfort? The simple answer is cost. Larger size equates to higher cost. Sedans are more economical than SUVs, which are in turn cheaper than vans. Even with electric vehicles, battery costs and wind resistance considerations mean that larger vehicles will likely remain more expensive. While a full-size van might offer superior comfort, this comes at a premium.
This fundamental trade-off between price and vehicle size has shaped the automotive market into distinct vehicle classes and models for many years. When consumers compare cars side by side, they are weighing these practical factors. This dynamic, driven by practicality and budget, not just driving enjoyment, is set to continue influencing car purchasing decisions in the foreseeable future, even in an era of increasing vehicle autonomy.
