Choosing the right CPU is crucial for your computer’s performance, and when you’re looking to Compare Amd Processors, understanding benchmark data is essential. The market offers a wide array of AMD CPUs, each with different specifications and capabilities. To navigate this complex landscape, comprehensive CPU benchmarks are invaluable. This guide provides a detailed comparison of AMD processors, ranking them based on rigorous testing and performance metrics, particularly in gaming and productivity workloads. Whether you’re building a high-end gaming rig, a workstation for demanding tasks, or simply seeking the best value, understanding how AMD processors stack up against each other is key to making an informed decision.
CPU Chip
AMD has consistently pushed the boundaries of CPU technology, and their current lineup showcases significant advancements. This article delves into the performance hierarchy of AMD processors in 2024, drawing upon extensive benchmarks to illustrate their strengths and weaknesses. We’ll explore how AMD’s Ryzen series, known for its innovative architectures like Zen 4 and Zen 5, performs across various applications. From gaming frame rates to single-threaded and multi-threaded application speeds, we’ll dissect the data to provide a clear picture of where each AMD processor excels. This comparison will not only highlight the top-performing AMD chips but also guide you in selecting the processor that best fits your specific needs and budget.
AMD Processor Benchmarks Rankings 2024 – Windows 10 and Windows 11
To provide a comprehensive comparison of AMD processors, we’ve compiled benchmark data using a high-end test system featuring the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090. These benchmarks are conducted on both Windows 10 and Windows 11 to ensure broad compatibility and relevance. The following rankings are derived from our extensive suite of tests, which cover gaming, single-threaded applications, and multi-threaded workloads. These benchmarks offer a direct comparison of AMD processors, allowing you to see how each chip performs relative to others in the market.
Image 1 of 9
Our benchmark data encompasses a range of AMD processors, from the latest Ryzen 9 series to more mainstream Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 models. We have meticulously tested these processors to provide rankings for gaming performance, single-threaded application performance, and multi-threaded application performance. The charts and tables below present these rankings in an easy-to-understand format, allowing you to directly compare AMD processors and identify the best options for your specific use cases. Keep in mind that these benchmarks are based on raw performance numbers, presented as scores relative to the top-performing processor in each category.
Gaming CPU Benchmarks Ranking 2024: AMD Dominance
AMD processors have established themselves as leaders in gaming performance, particularly with their Ryzen 7000 and 9000 series CPUs. The following table ranks AMD processors based on their gaming prowess, measured using a suite of demanding titles at 1080p resolution. AMD’s innovative 3D V-Cache technology, featured in processors like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 9 9800X3D, has significantly boosted gaming frame rates, making these chips top choices for gamers.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
2024 Gaming CPU Benchmark Hierarchy: AMD vs Intel
| Product / (MSRP) | Lowest Price | 1080p Gaming Score | Architecture | Cores/Threads (P+E) | Base/Boost GHz | TDP / PBP / MTP |
|—|—|—|—|—|—|—|
| Ryzen 7 9800X3D ($480) | No Stock | 100.00% | Zen 5 | 8 / 16 | 4.7 / 5.2 | 120W / 162W |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D ($449) | $449 | 87.18% | Zen 4 | 8 / 16 | 4.2 / 5.0 | 120W / 162W |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D ($699) | No Stock | 85.75% | Zen 4 | 16 / 32 | 4.2 / 5.7 | 120W / 162W |
| Ryzen 5 7600X3D ($299) | Microcenter | 81.30% | Zen 4 | 6 / 12 | 4.1 / 4.7 | 65W / 88W |
| Ryzen 9 7900X3D ($599) | $609 | 79.94% | Zen 4 | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | 120W / 162W |
| Core i9-14900K ($549) | $433 | 77.10% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.2 / 6.0 | 125W / 253W |
| Ryzen 7 9700X ($359) | $324 | 76.74% | Zen 5 | 8 /16 | 3.8 / 5.5 | 65W / 88W / 105W |
| Ryzen 9 9950X ($649) | $564 | 76.67% | Zen 5 | 16 / 32 | 4.3 / 5.7 | 170W / 230W |
| Core i7-14700K ($409) | $315 | 75.76% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 20 / 28 | 3.4 / 5.6 | 125W / 253W |
| Core i9-13900K ($589) | $542 | 75.40% | Raptor Lake | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.0 / 5.8 | 125W / 253W |
| Core i7-13700K ($275) | $329 | 74.94% | Raptor Lake | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.4 / 5.4 | 125W / 253W |
| Core 9 285K CU-8200 | DDR5-7200 ($589) | $599 | 74.17% | 72.45% | Arrow Lake | 24 / 24 (8+16) | 3.7 / 5.7 | 125W / 250W |
| Ryzen 9 9900X ($499) | $409 | 74.09% | Zen 5 | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | 120W / 162W |
| Ryzen 5 9600X ($279) | $245 | 72.81% | Zen 5 | 6 / 12 | 3.9 / 5.4 | 65W / 88W |
| Ryzen 9 7950X ($569) | $523 | 71.65% | Zen 4 | 16 / 32 | 4.5 / 5.7 | 170W / 230W |
| Core 7 265K CU-8200 | DDR5-7200 ($394) | $372 | 70.77% | 70.17% | Arrow Lake | 20 / 20 (8+12) | 3.9 / 5.5 | 125W / 250W |
| Core i5-14600K ($319) | $224 | 70.61% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 14 / 20 | 3.5 / 5.3 | 125W / 181W |
| Core i5-13600K ($225) | $250 | 68.64% | Raptor Lake | 14 / 20 (6+8) | 3.5 / 5.1 | 125W / 181W |
| Ryzen 9 7900X ($474) | $398 | 69.71% | Zen 4 | 12 / 24 | 4.7 / 5.6 | 170W / 230W |
| Ryzen 7 7700X ($349) | $314 | 68.33% | Zen 4 | 8 / 16 | 4.5 / 5.4 | 105W / 142W |
| Ryzen 7 5700X3D ($229) | $230 | 67.46% | Zen 3 | 8 / 16 | 3.0 / 4.1 | 105W / 142W |
| Core 5 245K CU-8200 | DDR5-7200 ($309) | $319 | 67.39% | 67.18% | Arrow Lake | 14 / 14 (6+8) | 4.2 / 5.2 | 125W / 250W |
| Core i9-12900K ($589) | No Stock | 66.92% | Alder Lake | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.2 / 5.2 | 125W / 241W |
| Ryzen 5 7600X ($249) | $198 | 65.62% | Zen 4 | 6 / 12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | 105W / 142W |
| Core i7-12700K ($209) | $197 | 63.06% | Alder Lake | 12 / 20 (8+4) | 3.6 / 5.0 | 125W / 190W |
| Core i5-12600K ($150) | $150 | 58.61% | Alder Lake | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 3.7 / 4.9 | 125W / 150W |
| Core i5-14400 ($225) | $191 | 52.67% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 2.5 / 4.7 | 65W / 148W |
As the table indicates, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D currently sits at the top of the gaming performance hierarchy. Following closely are other AMD processors like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, all leveraging AMD’s Zen architecture and 3D V-Cache technology to deliver exceptional gaming experiences. This technology provides a significant advantage in gaming by increasing the amount of L3 cache available to the CPU, which is particularly beneficial for game engines. While Intel processors like the Core i9-14900K are also present in the ranking, AMD’s Ryzen processors consistently demonstrate a strong edge in gaming benchmarks at this level. This data underscores AMD’s focus on optimizing their processors for gaming workloads, making them a preferred choice for gamers seeking top-tier performance.
Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2024: AMD vs Intel
Single-threaded performance is critical for many applications, influencing system responsiveness and the speed of tasks like web browsing and running older software. In this category, we compare AMD processors based on their single-threaded application scores. While AMD has made strides in single-threaded performance, Intel has historically held an advantage in this area. However, the latest AMD Ryzen processors are closing the gap, offering competitive single-threaded performance alongside their gaming leadership.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
2024 Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks: AMD and Intel Face-off
| | Single-Threaded App Score | Architecture | Cores/Threads (P+E) | Base/Boost GHz | TDP / PBP / MTP |
|—|—|—|—|—|—|
| $620 – Core 9 285K CU-8200 | DDR5-7200 | 100% | 99.9% | Arrow Lake | 24 / 24 (8+16) | 3.7 / 5.7 | 125W / 250W |
| $380 – Core 7 265K CU-8200 | 97.3% | Arrow Lake | 20 / 20 (8+12) | 3.9 / 5.5 | 125W / 250W |
| $440 – Core i9-14900K | 97.1% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.2 / 6.0 | 125W / 253W |
| $600 – Ryzen 9 9950X | 94.0% | Zen 5 | 16 / 32 | 4.3 / 5.7 | 170W / 230W |
| $320 – Core 5 245K CU-8200 | DDR5-7200 | 93.7% | 93.3% | Arrow Lake | 14 / 14 (6+8) | 4.2 / 5.2 | 125W / 250W |
| $380 – Ryzen 9 9900X | 92.6% | Zen 5 | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | 120W / 162W |
| $440 – Core i7-14700K | 91.4% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 20 / 28 | 3.4 / 5.6 | 125W / 253W |
| $400 – Core i9-13900K | 91.1% | Raptor Lake | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.0 / 5.8 | 125 / 253W |
| $250 – Ryzen 5 9600X | 90.6% | Zen 5 | 6 / 12 | 3.9 / 5.4 | 65W / 88W |
| $320 – Ryzen 7 9700X | 90.1% | Zen 5 | 8 /16 | 3.8 / 5.5 | 65W / 88W / 105W |
| $275 – Core i7-13700K | 88.4% | Raptor Lake | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.4 / 5.4 | 125W / 253W |
| $480 – Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 88.1% | Zen 5 | 8 / 16 | 4.7 / 5.2 | 120W / 162W |
| $235 – Core i5-14600K | 87.0% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 14 / 20 | 3.5 / 5.3 | 125W / 181W |
| $490 – Ryzen 9 7950X | 86.2% | Zen 4 | 16 / 32 | 4.5 / 5.7 | 170W / 230W |
| $600 – Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 86.1% | Zen 4 | 16 / 32 | 4.2 / 5.7 | 120W / 162W |
| $370 – Ryzen 9 7900X | 85.8% | Zen 4 | 12 / 24 | 4.7 / 5.6 | 170 / 230W |
| $490 – Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 84.6% | Zen 4 | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | 120W / 162W |
| $220 – Ryzen 5 7600X | 84.2% | Zen 4 | 6 / 12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | 105 / 142W |
| $225 – Core i5-13600K | 83.9% | Raptor Lake | 14 / 20 (6+8) | 3.5 / 5.1 | 125W / 181W |
| $300 – Ryzen 7 7700X | 83.4% | Zen 4 | 8 / 16 | 4.5 / 5.4 | 105 / 142W |
| $280 – Core i9-12900K | 81.5% | Alder Lake | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.2 / 5.2 | 125 / 241W |
| $209 – Core i7-12700K | 81.2% | Alder Lake | 12 / 20 (8+4) | 3.6 / 5.0 | 125W / 190W |
| $150 – Core i5-12600K | 79.7% | Alder Lake | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 3.7 / 4.9 | 125W / 150W |
| $460 – Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 77.5% | Zen 4 | 8 / 16 | 4.2 / 5.0 | 120W / 162W |
| $210 – Core i5-14400 | 76.6% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 2.5 / 4.7 | 65W / 148W |
| $300 – Ryzen 5 7600X3D | 73.9% | Zen 4 | 6 / 12 | 4.1 / 4.7 | 65W / 88W |
| $220 – Ryzen 7 5700X3D | 61.1% | Zen 3 | 8 / 16 | 3.0 / 4.1 | 105 / 142W |
The single-threaded benchmark ranking reveals that while Intel processors like the Core 9 285K often lead, several AMD Ryzen processors demonstrate strong single-threaded performance. Notably, the Ryzen 9 9950X, Ryzen 9 9900X, and Ryzen 5 9600X, all based on the Zen 5 architecture, achieve high scores in single-threaded applications. These results indicate AMD’s progress in enhancing the per-core performance of their processors, making them increasingly versatile for both gaming and general-purpose computing. While Intel might retain a slight edge in the very top tier of single-threaded performance, AMD’s Ryzen CPUs offer a compelling balance, especially considering their dominant gaming performance and competitive pricing in many segments.
Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2024: AMD’s Strength in Productivity
For tasks that leverage multiple cores and threads, such as video editing, content creation, and scientific simulations, multi-threaded performance is paramount. AMD processors, particularly the Ryzen 9 and Ryzen 7 series with their high core counts, excel in multi-threaded workloads. This section compares AMD processors based on their multi-threaded application benchmark scores, highlighting their capabilities in demanding productivity tasks.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
2024 Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks: AMD Leads in Core Performance
| | Multi-Threaded App Score | Architecture | Cores/Threads (P+E) | Base/Boost GHz | TDP / PBP / MTP |
|—|—|—|—|—|—|
| $600 – Ryzen 9 9950X | 100% | Zen 5 | 16 / 32 | 4.3 / 5.7 | 170W / 230W |
| $620 – Core 9 285K CU-8200 | DDR5-7200 | 95.6% | 95.0% | Arrow Lake | 24 / 24 (8+16) | 3.7 / 5.7 | 125W / 250W |
| $490 – Ryzen 9 7950X | 89.0% | Zen 4 | 16 / 32 | 4.2 / 5.7 | 120W / 162W |
| $600 – Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 84.4% | Zen 4 | 16 / 32 | 4.2 / 5.7 | 120W / 162W |
| $440 – Core i9-14900K | 82.6% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.2 / 6.0 | 125W / 253W |
| $380 – Core 7 265K CU-8200 | 82.6% | Arrow Lake | 20 / 20 (8+12) | 3.9 / 5.5 | 125W / 250W |
| $400 – Core i9-13900K | 80.7% | Raptor Lake | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.0 / 5.8 | 125 / 253W |
| $380 – Ryzen 9 9900X | 78.2% | Zen 5 | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | 120W / 162W |
| $440 – Core i7-14700K | 73.1% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 20 / 28 | 3.4 / 5.6 | 125W / 253W |
| $370 – Ryzen 9 7900X | 69.0% | Zen 4 | 12 / 24 | 4.7 / 5.6 | 170W / 230W |
| $275 – Core i7-13700K | 64.8% | Raptor Lake | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.4 / 5.4 | 125W / 253W |
| $490 – Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 63.6% | Zen 4 | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | 120W / 162W |
| $280 – Core i9-12900K | 59.1% | Alder Lake | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.2 / 5.2 | 125 / 241W |
| $480 – Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 58.3% | Zen 5 | 8 / 16 | 4.7 / 5.2 | 120W / 162W |
| $320 – Core 5 245K CU-8200 | DDR5-7200 | 57.3% | 56.9% | Arrow Lake | 14 / 14 (6+8) | 4.2 / 5.2 | 125W / 250W |
| $320 – Ryzen 7 9700X | 55.9% | Zen 5 | 8 /16 | 3.8 / 5.5 | 65W / 88W / 105W |
| $235 – Core i5-14600K | 52.7% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 14 / 20 | 3.5 / 5.3 | 125W / 181W |
| $225 – Core i5-13600K | 51.7% | Raptor Lake | 14 / 20 (6+8) | 3.5 / 5.1 | 125W / 181W |
| $209 – Core i7-12700K | 50.3% | Alder Lake | 12 / 20 (8+4) | 3.6 / 5.0 | 125W / 190W |
| $300 – Ryzen 7 7700X | 47.0% | Zen 4 | 8 / 16 | 4.5 / 5.4 | 105 / 142W |
| $460 – Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 43.5% | Zen 4 | 8 / 16 | 4.2 / 5.0 | 120W / 162W |
| $250 – Ryzen 5 9600X | 65W / 88W | Zen 5 | 6 / 12 | 3.9 / 5.4 | 65W / 88W |
| $150 – Core i5-12600K | 38.4% | Alder Lake | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 3.7 / 4.9 | 125W / 150W |
| $220 – Ryzen 5 7600X | 36.2% | Zen 4 | 6 / 12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | 105W / 142W |
| $210 – Core i5-14400 | 35.3% | Raptor Lake Refresh | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 2.5 / 4.7 | 65W / 148W |
| $300 – Ryzen 5 7600X3D | 32.8% | Zen 4 | 6 / 12 | 4.1 / 4.7 | 65W / 88W |
| $220 – Ryzen 7 5700X3D | 32.0% | Zen 3 | 8 / 16 | 3.0 / 4.1 | 105 / 142W |
In multi-threaded benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X takes the lead, showcasing the exceptional multi-core performance of AMD’s Zen 5 architecture. Other high-core-count AMD processors like the Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D also rank highly, demonstrating AMD’s strength in delivering processors for demanding productivity workloads. These CPUs are well-suited for professionals and creators who require substantial multi-core processing power for tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. While Intel processors like the Core 9 285K are competitive, AMD’s Ryzen 9 series generally offers superior multi-threaded performance, making them a compelling choice for users focused on productivity and content creation.
Integrated GPU Gaming CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2024: AMD APUs Lead
For users who rely on integrated graphics, AMD’s APUs (Accelerated Processing Units), which combine a CPU and integrated GPU on a single chip, offer compelling gaming performance without the need for a dedicated graphics card. This section compares AMD APUs and Intel processors with integrated graphics, focusing on their gaming capabilities. AMD’s Radeon integrated graphics generally outperform Intel’s integrated graphics solutions, making AMD APUs a strong choice for budget-conscious gamers or users with less graphically intensive workloads.
Image 1 of 8
Swipe to scroll horizontally
iGPU Performance relative to Ryzen 7 5700G: AMD APUs vs Intel iGPUs
| | 1280×720 | 1920×1080 |
|—|—|—|
| Ryzen 7 5700G B550-E | 100% | 100% |
| Ryzen 5 5600G | 96.3% | 96% |
| Ryzen 7 4750G | 92.9% | 94.1% |
| Ryzen 3 5300G | 85.8% | 87.2% |
| Ryzen 5 3400G | 83.5% | 84.1% |
| Ryzen 3 3200G | 77.1% | 78.1% |
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 32 EU (11600K, 11700K) | 58.3% | ~48.9% |
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 24 EU (i5-11400) | 51.7% | 42.9% |
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 24 EU (10600K) | 36.0% | 34.4% |
The integrated graphics benchmark table clearly demonstrates AMD’s dominance in this segment. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600G APUs lead the charts, delivering significantly better gaming performance compared to Intel’s UHD Graphics solutions. This is attributed to AMD’s Radeon graphics architecture, which provides a substantial advantage in integrated graphics performance. For users looking to build a budget gaming PC or a system for everyday tasks with occasional light gaming, AMD APUs offer an excellent balance of CPU and integrated GPU performance. They eliminate the need for a discrete graphics card, reducing system cost and power consumption while still providing a capable gaming experience at lower resolutions and settings.
How to Benchmark Your AMD Processor
Benchmarking your own AMD processor is a valuable practice, especially if you’re interested in overclocking or optimizing your system’s performance. By running benchmarks before and after making changes, you can directly measure the impact of those changes. Benchmarking helps you ensure that your AMD processor is performing as expected and allows you to compare its performance against other systems and configurations.
Choosing the right CPU benchmarks is essential for accurate performance measurement. While real-world benchmarks using the applications you frequently use are ideal, synthetic benchmarks offer standardized tests that allow for easier comparisons. For AMD processors, popular benchmarks include Cinebench for CPU rendering performance, Geekbench for overall CPU performance, and 3DMark for gaming and graphics performance. These benchmarks provide scores that you can compare with online databases and reviews to gauge your AMD processor’s performance relative to other CPUs.
For gaming benchmarks, you can use in-game benchmark tools or frame rate monitoring software like FRAPS to measure performance in your favorite games. Consistent benchmarking practices will help you understand your AMD processor’s capabilities and optimize your system for the best possible performance.
Best CPU Benchmarks You Can Run
Here are some of the best CPU benchmarks you can use to test your AMD processor:
- Cinebench: A widely used benchmark for evaluating CPU rendering performance, excellent for assessing multi-threaded capabilities.
- Geekbench: A cross-platform benchmark that measures both single-core and multi-core CPU performance, providing an overall performance score.
- 3DMark: A suite of benchmarks that test gaming and graphics performance, including CPU-related physics and combined tests.
- POV-Ray: A ray-tracing benchmark that measures CPU rendering speed, useful for evaluating single and multi-threaded performance.
- Blender Benchmark: Tests CPU rendering performance using the popular Blender 3D creation suite.
- WebXPRT: A browser-based benchmark that measures web browsing performance, reflecting single-threaded efficiency and responsiveness.
- LAME Encoder: An audio encoding benchmark that measures CPU speed in real-world audio processing tasks.
- y-cruncher: A highly demanding benchmark that calculates Pi and other constants to trillions of digits, stressing CPU computational limits.
- Handbrake: A video encoding benchmark that tests CPU performance in video transcoding tasks.
2024 CPU Benchmarks Test System and Configuration
Our CPU benchmarks are conducted using a carefully selected test system to ensure consistent and reliable results. The test configurations include high-end components to minimize bottlenecks and accurately reflect CPU performance. For AMD processors, we use the AMD Socket AM5 platform with X670E motherboards and DDR5 memory. The test systems are equipped with high-performance components, including:
Swipe to scroll horizontally
2024 CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy Test Setup: AMD and Intel Platforms
| Intel Socket 1700 DDR5 (Z790) | Core i9-13900K, i7-13700K, i5-13600K |
|—|—|
| Row 1 – Cell 0 | MSI MPG Z790 Carbon WiFi |
| Row 2 – Cell 0 | G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6800 – Stock: DDR5-5600 | OC: XMP DDR5-6800 |
| AMD Socket AM5 (X670E) | Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7600, Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 9 7950X, Ryzen 9 7900X, Ryzen 5 7600X |
| Row 4 – Cell 0 | ASRock X670E Taichi |
| Row 5 – Cell 0 | G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 – Stock: DDR5-5200 | OC/PBO: DDR5-6000 |
| Intel Socket 1700 DDR5 (Z690) | Core i5-12400, i5-12600K, i7-12700K, i9-12900K |
| Row 7 – Cell 0 | MSI MEG Z690 Ace |
| Row 8 – Cell 0 | G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5-6400 – Stock: DDR5-4400 | OC DDR5-6000 |
| AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | Ryzen 9 5950X, 5900X, 5700X, 5600X, 5800X3D |
| Row 10 – Cell 0 | MSI MEG X570 Godlike |
| Row 11 – Cell 0 | 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 – Stock: DDR4-3200 | OC/PBO: DDR4-3800 |
| All Systems | Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC |
| Row 13 – Cell 0 | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle – ProViz applications |
| Row 14 – Cell 0 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE – Application tests |
| Row 15 – Cell 0 | 2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, Silverstone ST1100-TI, Open Benchtable, Arctic MX-4 TIM, Windows 11 Pro |
| Cooling | Corsair H115i, Custom loop |
| Overclocking note | All configurations with overclocked memory also have tuned core frequencies and/or lifted power limits. |
This robust test system ensures that our benchmark results accurately reflect the performance differences between AMD processors and provide a reliable basis for comparison.
Explore More on CPUs:
- Best CPUs for Gaming: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html
- AMD vs Intel CPU Comparison: https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus
- Intel 13th-Gen Raptor Lake CPUs: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-13th-gen-raptor-lake-release-date-specifications-pricing-benchmarks-all-we-know-specs
- AMD Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 Series: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-zen-4-ryzen-7000-release-date-specifications-pricing-benchmarks-all-we-know-specs
- How to Overclock a CPU: https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-overclock-a-cpu
- How to Check CPU Temperature: https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-check-cpu-temp-temperature
- All CPU Content on Tom’s Hardware: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus
Conclusion: Choosing the Right AMD Processor
Comparing AMD processors in 2024 reveals a clear picture of their strengths: exceptional gaming performance, strong multi-threaded capabilities, and leading integrated graphics in their APUs. Whether you prioritize gaming, productivity, or budget-friendly builds, AMD offers a range of processors to meet diverse needs. The Ryzen 9 series stands out for high-end gaming and demanding productivity tasks, while the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 5 series provide excellent value and performance for mainstream users and gamers. AMD’s commitment to innovation, particularly with technologies like 3D V-Cache and the Zen architectures, ensures that their processors remain competitive and compelling choices in the CPU market. By understanding these benchmark comparisons, you can confidently select the AMD processor that best aligns with your performance requirements and budget.
This article is based on benchmark data and analysis to provide an objective comparison of AMD processors. For more detailed information and the latest updates, refer to the original source and further resources provided.
Original Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html
