WASHINGTON, D.C. — In the ongoing global influence race, the United States currently appears to be ahead of China in terms of worldwide leadership approval. However, a recent report by Gallup reveals that this approval is significantly influenced by changes in political administrations. This analysis delves into the dynamics of global leadership perception, specifically examining China Compared To Us, based on the latest findings from Gallup’s comprehensive study.
Understanding Leadership Net Approval and Soft Power
Countries employ various strategies to advance their agendas on the international stage. Soft power, which involves exerting influence through cultural appeal, shared values, and diplomatic engagement, is a key tool to achieve objectives without resorting to economic pressure or military force.
Measuring soft power is complex as it operates on multiple levels, from political elites to the general public. Elite perceptions can shape public opinion about other nations, and conversely, public sentiment can influence the strategic decisions of leaders.
For nearly two decades, Gallup has tracked global opinions on the leadership of the U.S., China, Russia, and Germany. To gauge overall public sentiment towards these global powers, Gallup calculates “leadership net approval.” This metric represents the difference between the percentage of people who approve and disapprove of a country’s leadership performance.
The resulting net approval score provides a valuable indicator of a crucial aspect of soft power at the population level. When comparing the net approval scores of two nations, such as the U.S. and China, we gain a “relative net approval score.” This score reflects the competitive nature of international relations, where the foreign policy goals of major powers like the U.S. and China can sometimes clash. A net approval advantage in a particular country can provide a significant advantage in achieving strategic objectives.
Shifting Global Perceptions: US vs. China Over Time
While the U.S. held a significant net approval advantage over China in 2023, it’s crucial to recognize the fluctuations in global attitudes over the past two decades, a period marked by Gallup’s continuous tracking. These shifts are notably correlated with changes in U.S. presidential administrations, spanning from George W. Bush and Barack Obama to Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
The following visual representation highlights the evolving net approval advantages over time. Each point in the graphic represents a country, illustrating the dynamic landscape of global leadership perception.
- The central diagonal line acts as a dividing point: countries positioned above this line indicate China holds the advantage, while those below show the U.S. in the lead.
- The dashed diagonal lines demarcate a more substantial advantage, indicating a 50+-point lead for either China (above the upper dashed line) or the U.S. (below the lower dashed line).
- The chart is further segmented into quadrants, categorizing country types based on net approval:
- Quadrant 1: Positive net approval for China, negative for the U.S.
- Quadrant 2: Positive net approval for both China and the U.S.
- Quadrant 3: Negative net approval for both China and the U.S.
- Quadrant 4: Negative net approval for China, positive for the U.S.
- The counters within the chart quantify the number of countries falling into each of these categories annually, providing a year-by-year snapshot of global alignment.
Global Leadership Advantage: U.S. vs. China, 2007-2023
Animated scatter plot showing the global leadership advantage of the United States against China from 2007 to 2023, across 133 or 134 countries, highlighting the shifting number of countries favoring each nation over time.
Democratic vs. Republican Leadership Impact
The data reveals a striking pattern: the U.S. tends to enjoy a considerable net approval advantage under Democratic leadership, while facing a significant disadvantage under Republican administrations. This dramatic swing in global perception becomes even more apparent when comparing country alignments across different years.
The resurgence of U.S. net approval to levels seen during the Obama era under the Biden administration suggests a degree of resilience in America’s global standing, particularly when considering the proportion of countries strongly or moderately aligned with the U.S.
China’s Consistent but Limited Appeal
Conversely, the proportion of countries showing strong or moderate alignment with China has remained consistently low. China’s peak advantage occurred in 2007, during its emergence onto the global stage. While China experienced short-term gains in country alignment during the Trump presidency, these were largely categorized as “weakly aligned.” Increased global familiarity with China has not necessarily translated into greater attraction to its leadership.
A Great Disillusionment?
Analyzing the distribution of countries across the four quadrants reveals a concerning trend: a decline in the number of countries in Quadrant 2 (positive net approval for both China and the U.S.) and an increase in Quadrant 3 (negative net approval for both).
The proportion of countries in Quadrant 3 reached its peak during the Trump administration, hitting 48% in 2020. While this proportion has decreased under the Biden administration, it remains approximately double the level observed during most of the Obama era.
This rise in countries expressing negative net approval towards both U.S. and Chinese leadership suggests a growing global disillusionment with these two major powers, indicating a broader trend of declining enthusiasm for their global roles.
Regional Realignment: Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa
While short-term fluctuations in leadership net approval are informative, examining long-term shifts helps identify strategic realignments of specific countries. To account for administration-related swings, this analysis considers the average relative net approval score over four-year periods, encompassing both Democratic and Republican presidencies.
A change of 30 to 50 points between 2007-2010 and 2019-2022 is considered a moderate realignment, and a change exceeding 50 points signifies a strong realignment. Asia and sub-Saharan Africa have witnessed the most significant country realignments.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, China has made long-term gains in countries like Tanzania, Uganda, South Africa, and Malawi. The near-parity in net approval for both the U.S. and China in these nations between 2019 and 2022 presents a complex picture. This could indicate a gradual but persistent shift towards a growing Chinese net approval advantage. Alternatively, the period of 2007-2010, marked by Obama’s election and the popularity of Bush-era initiatives, might represent a high point for U.S. influence in the region.
Conversely, in Asia, the U.S. has achieved long-term gains in India, the Philippines, South Korea, and Vietnam. This trend suggests that geographical proximity does not necessarily foster closer ties with China. China’s assertive actions in its neighboring regions appear to have triggered a threat response, pushing these countries towards closer alignment with the U.S.
Conclusion: The US Advantage and Future Uncertainties
A nation’s soft power is rooted in global perceptions of its identity, actions, methods, and rhetoric. Currently, a significant majority of countries appear to favor U.S. leadership over Chinese leadership, particularly during Democratic administrations.
In recent years, the U.S. net approval advantage over China has seemingly rebounded after periods of decline under previous Republican administrations. However, the long-term sustainability of this rebound remains uncertain, especially if the U.S. continues to experience significant shifts in global perception associated with changes in domestic political leadership. While China faces limitations in enhancing global perceptions of its leadership, the U.S. advantage appears to be within its grasp to maintain, irrespective of the outcome of the 2024 presidential election.
To stay up to date with the latest Gallup News insights and updates, follow us on X.
For complete methodology and specific survey dates, please review Gallup’s Country Data Set details.
Learn more about how the Gallup World Poll works.
