A Comparable Look at ICE vs TEE for LAAO

COMPARE.EDU.VN provides A Comparable analysis of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in guiding percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). This thorough comparison explores efficacy and safety, offering a solution for healthcare professionals seeking data-driven insights to inform their clinical practice. This information supports optimal patient outcomes while also contributing to informed decision-making within cardiology.

1. Understanding Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO)

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a procedure performed to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial fibrillation, a common heart rhythm disorder, increases the risk of blood clots forming in the left atrial appendage (LAA), a small pouch-like structure connected to the left atrium of the heart. These blood clots can then travel to the brain, causing a stroke. LAAO involves sealing off the LAA, preventing blood clots from forming there and reducing the risk of stroke. This intervention is often considered for patients who cannot tolerate long-term anticoagulation therapy. Accurate and safe guidance during LAAO is critical to ensure the successful occlusion of the appendage while minimizing complications.

1.1 The Importance of Image Guidance During LAAO

Image guidance is crucial during LAAO to ensure accurate device placement and minimize the risk of complications. Real-time visualization of the heart’s anatomy, particularly the left atrial appendage, allows physicians to navigate the device to the correct location and confirm complete occlusion of the LAA. Effective image guidance helps in avoiding perforation, device embolization, and other adverse events. Two common imaging techniques used for LAAO guidance are transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). These techniques provide different perspectives and have unique advantages and disadvantages that influence their suitability for different clinical scenarios.

1.2 Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a technique that involves inserting a probe with an ultrasound transducer down the esophagus to obtain images of the heart. Because the esophagus lies directly behind the heart, TEE provides high-resolution images of the heart structures, including the left atrial appendage. TEE is widely used for LAAO guidance due to its ability to provide detailed anatomical visualization, assess device deployment, and detect complications such as pericardial effusion or device malposition. However, TEE requires sedation or anesthesia, which can increase procedural time and potential risks for patients. Additionally, TEE can be uncomfortable for some patients and may be contraindicated in those with esophageal disorders.

1.3 Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE)

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a technique that involves inserting a small ultrasound catheter into a vein, typically in the groin, and advancing it into the heart. The catheter is equipped with an ultrasound transducer that allows real-time imaging of the heart structures from within the heart. ICE provides a clear view of the left atrial appendage and surrounding structures, enabling accurate device placement and assessment of LAAO. Compared to TEE, ICE offers several advantages, including the potential for reduced sedation requirements, increased patient comfort, and avoidance of esophageal complications. However, ICE may have limitations in image quality compared to TEE, particularly in patients with poor acoustic windows or complex anatomy. Furthermore, ICE requires specialized training and equipment, which may not be available at all centers.

2. Comparative Analysis: ICE vs. TEE in LAAO Procedures

The choice between intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for guiding left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures involves careful consideration of their respective strengths and limitations. This section provides a comprehensive comparison of these two imaging modalities across several key aspects, including procedural success rates, safety profiles, procedural time, contrast volume, fluoroscopic time, and potential complications.

2.1 Procedural Success Rates

Studies comparing ICE and TEE in LAAO procedures have generally reported comparable procedural success rates. A meta-analysis of twenty studies involving 3,610 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients found no significant difference in procedural success rates between the ICE group (1,564 patients) and the TEE group (2,046 patients) (Risk Ratio (RR) = 1.01; P = 0.171). This suggests that both imaging modalities are equally effective in guiding the successful deployment of LAAO devices.

2.2 Safety Profiles

The safety profiles of ICE and TEE in LAAO procedures are also comparable. The meta-analysis mentioned above found no significant difference in procedural complications (RR = 0.82; P = 0.261) or long-term adverse events (RR = 0.86; P = 0.329) between the ICE and TEE groups. This indicates that both imaging techniques are relatively safe for guiding LAAO procedures, with similar risks of complications.

2.3 Procedural Time

Procedural time is an important consideration in LAAO procedures, as shorter procedural times can reduce patient discomfort and healthcare costs. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in total procedural time between the ICE and TEE groups (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = -5.58; P = 0.292). However, subgroup analyses revealed that ICE may be associated with lower total procedure time in certain subgroups, such as those using multi-seal mechanism devices.

2.4 Contrast Volume

Contrast agents are often used during LAAO procedures to enhance visualization of the heart structures. However, excessive contrast use can increase the risk of kidney damage, particularly in patients with pre-existing renal impairment. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in contrast volume between the ICE and TEE groups (WMD = -2.61; P = 0.595). Nevertheless, subgroup analyses indicated that ICE may be associated with reduced contrast use in specific subgroups, such as those with hypertension proportion <90% or paroxysmal AF (PAF) proportion ≤50%.

2.5 Fluoroscopic Time

Fluoroscopy, which uses X-rays to visualize the heart, is another important aspect of LAAO procedures. Prolonged fluoroscopic time can increase radiation exposure for both patients and healthcare professionals. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in fluoroscopic time between the ICE and TEE groups (WMD = -0.34; P = 0.705; I2 = 82.80%). However, subgroup analyses suggested that ICE may be associated with lower fluoroscopic time in certain subgroups, such as those with hypertension proportion <90% or using multi-seal mechanism devices.

2.6 Patient Comfort and Anesthesia Requirements

One of the key advantages of ICE over TEE is the potential for increased patient comfort and reduced anesthesia requirements. TEE typically requires moderate to deep sedation or general anesthesia, which can be associated with increased risks and costs. ICE, on the other hand, can often be performed with minimal sedation, leading to improved patient comfort and faster recovery times. This can be particularly beneficial for patients who are at high risk for complications from anesthesia.

2.7 Learning Curve and Expertise

Both ICE and TEE require specialized training and expertise to perform and interpret the images accurately. However, the learning curve for ICE may be steeper than that for TEE, as ICE requires a more thorough understanding of intracardiac anatomy and catheter manipulation techniques. Centers that are experienced in both ICE and TEE may be better equipped to select the most appropriate imaging modality for each patient based on their individual needs and anatomy.

3. Subgroup Analysis: Identifying Potential Confounding Factors

Subgroup analysis is a crucial component of comparative studies, as it helps to identify potential confounding factors that may influence the outcomes of interest. In the context of comparing intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), subgroup analyses can reveal how specific patient characteristics, device types, or procedural techniques may impact the relative efficacy and safety of these two imaging modalities.

3.1 Hypertension Proportion

The proportion of patients with hypertension in a study population can be a confounding factor in LAAO outcomes. Hypertension is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and can affect the structure and function of the heart, potentially influencing the success and safety of LAAO procedures. Subgroup analysis in the meta-analysis revealed that ICE may be associated with a reduction in contrast use and fluoroscopic time in the subgroup of studies with a hypertension proportion of less than 90%. This suggests that ICE may be particularly advantageous in patients with lower rates of hypertension, potentially due to improved visualization or procedural efficiency.

3.2 Device Type

The type of LAAO device used can also influence procedural outcomes. Different devices have different designs, sizes, and deployment mechanisms, which may affect the ease and accuracy of device placement. Subgroup analysis in the meta-analysis showed that ICE was associated with lower total procedure time, contrast volume, and fluoroscopic time in the device type subgroup with a multi-seal mechanism. Multi-seal devices may be easier to visualize and deploy under ICE guidance, leading to improved procedural efficiency and reduced resource utilization.

3.3 Paroxysmal AF (PAF) Proportion

The proportion of patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) in a study population can be another confounding factor. PAF is a type of AF that comes and goes, as opposed to persistent or permanent AF. Patients with PAF may have different atrial remodeling and thrombus formation patterns compared to those with other types of AF, which could affect LAAO outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed that ICE may be associated with lower contrast use in the subgroup of studies with a PAF proportion of ≤50%. This suggests that ICE may be particularly beneficial in patients with lower rates of PAF, potentially due to reduced need for contrast to visualize the LAA.

Conversely, ICE was associated with increased total procedure time in the PAF proportion >50% subgroup. This suggests that ICE may be less efficient in patients with higher rates of PAF, possibly due to challenges in visualizing the LAA or deploying the device in this population.

3.4 Multi-Center Studies

Whether a study is conducted at a single center or multiple centers can also influence the results. Multi-center studies may have greater heterogeneity in patient populations, procedural techniques, and operator experience, which can increase variability in outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed that ICE was associated with increased contrast use in multi-center studies. This suggests that the benefits of ICE in reducing contrast use may be less pronounced in multi-center settings, potentially due to variations in contrast administration protocols or operator experience.

4. Advantages and Disadvantages of ICE and TEE

Both intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have distinct advantages and disadvantages when used for guiding left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures. Understanding these pros and cons is essential for making informed decisions about which imaging modality is most appropriate for a given patient and clinical setting. This section provides a detailed overview of the advantages and disadvantages of ICE and TEE in LAAO.

4.1 Advantages of ICE

• Reduced Sedation Requirements: ICE can often be performed with minimal sedation, leading to improved patient comfort and faster recovery times compared to TEE, which typically requires moderate to deep sedation or general anesthesia.

• Increased Patient Comfort: Patients generally experience less discomfort with ICE compared to TEE, as ICE involves inserting a small catheter into a vein rather than passing a probe down the esophagus.

• Avoidance of Esophageal Complications: ICE avoids the risk of esophageal complications such as perforation or bleeding, which can occur with TEE. This makes ICE a safer option for patients with esophageal disorders or those at high risk for esophageal injury.

• Real-Time Imaging: ICE provides real-time, high-resolution images of the heart structures, allowing physicians to visualize the LAA and surrounding tissues during the procedure.

• Catheter Maneuverability: The ICE catheter can be easily manipulated within the heart to obtain different views of the LAA, providing flexibility in imaging and device placement.

4.2 Disadvantages of ICE

• Image Quality: Image quality with ICE may be limited compared to TEE, particularly in patients with poor acoustic windows or complex anatomy.

• Learning Curve: ICE requires specialized training and expertise to perform and interpret the images accurately. The learning curve for ICE may be steeper than that for TEE.

• Equipment Costs: ICE requires specialized equipment, including an ICE catheter and ultrasound system, which can be expensive to purchase and maintain.

• Potential Complications: Although rare, ICE can be associated with potential complications such as vascular injury, cardiac perforation, or thromboembolic events.

• Limited Availability: ICE may not be available at all centers, particularly those with limited experience in structural heart procedures.

4.3 Advantages of TEE

• High-Resolution Imaging: TEE provides high-resolution images of the heart structures, including the LAA, allowing for detailed visualization of anatomy and device deployment.

• Established Technique: TEE is a well-established imaging technique that is widely used for various cardiac procedures, including LAAO.

• Comprehensive Assessment: TEE allows for comprehensive assessment of the heart, including valve function, chamber size, and presence of thrombus.

• Ease of Use: TEE is relatively easy to perform and interpret, particularly for experienced echocardiographers.

• Wide Availability: TEE is widely available at most hospitals and cardiac centers.

4.4 Disadvantages of TEE

• Sedation Requirements: TEE typically requires moderate to deep sedation or general anesthesia, which can increase procedural risks and costs.

• Patient Discomfort: TEE can be uncomfortable for some patients, as it involves passing a probe down the esophagus.

• Risk of Esophageal Complications: TEE is associated with a risk of esophageal complications such as perforation, bleeding, or irritation.

• Limited Maneuverability: The TEE probe has limited maneuverability, which can make it difficult to obtain optimal views of the LAA in some patients.

• Contraindications: TEE may be contraindicated in patients with esophageal disorders or those at high risk for esophageal injury.

5. Clinical Implications and Recommendations

The decision to use intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for guiding left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the patient’s individual characteristics, the operator’s experience, and the available resources. While both imaging modalities have been shown to be comparable in terms of procedural success and safety, certain factors may favor the use of one technique over the other. This section provides clinical implications and recommendations to guide the selection of ICE or TEE for LAAO.

5.1 Patient Selection

Patient selection is a crucial factor in determining the optimal imaging modality for LAAO. ICE may be preferred in patients who:

• Are at high risk for complications from sedation or anesthesia
• Have esophageal disorders or contraindications to TEE
• Prefer to avoid sedation or anesthesia
• Have anatomy that is difficult to visualize with TEE

TEE may be preferred in patients who:

• Require comprehensive assessment of the heart
• Have complex anatomy that is best visualized with high-resolution imaging
• Are comfortable with sedation or anesthesia
• Have no contraindications to TEE

5.2 Operator Experience

The operator’s experience with both ICE and TEE is another important consideration. Operators who are highly skilled in both techniques may be better equipped to select the most appropriate imaging modality for each patient and to manage any complications that may arise. Centers that have a dedicated structural heart team with expertise in both ICE and TEE are likely to achieve the best outcomes.

5.3 Resource Availability

Resource availability, including equipment, staffing, and training, can also influence the choice between ICE and TEE. Centers that have invested in ICE technology and have trained personnel may be more likely to offer ICE as a primary imaging modality for LAAO. Centers that do not have ICE capabilities may rely primarily on TEE.

5.4 Procedural Considerations

Procedural considerations, such as the type of LAAO device used and the complexity of the anatomy, can also impact the choice of imaging modality. ICE may be preferred for procedures using multi-seal mechanism devices or in patients with simple anatomy, while TEE may be preferred for procedures using more complex devices or in patients with challenging anatomy.

5.5 Future Directions

Future research should focus on identifying specific patient subgroups that may benefit most from ICE or TEE. Randomized controlled trials comparing ICE and TEE in LAAO are needed to provide more definitive evidence regarding the relative efficacy and safety of these two imaging modalities. Additionally, studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of ICE and TEE in LAAO are warranted.

6. Recent Advances and Technological Innovations

The field of cardiac imaging is constantly evolving, with new advances and technological innovations emerging regularly. These advancements have the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures, regardless of whether intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used for guidance. This section highlights some recent advances and technological innovations in cardiac imaging that are relevant to LAAO.

6.1 Three-Dimensional (3D) Echocardiography

Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography provides a more comprehensive and realistic view of the heart’s anatomy compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. 3D TEE has been shown to improve the accuracy of LAAO device sizing and placement, potentially reducing the risk of complications. 3D ICE is also being developed and may offer similar benefits.

6.2 Real-Time Fusion Imaging

Real-time fusion imaging combines images from different modalities, such as echocardiography and fluoroscopy, to provide a more complete picture of the heart’s anatomy and the LAAO device. This technology can help to guide device placement and assess the completeness of LAAO, potentially improving procedural outcomes.

6.3 Intracardiac Ultrasound (ICUS)

Intracardiac ultrasound (ICUS) is a type of ICE that uses higher-frequency ultrasound waves to provide even more detailed images of the heart’s structures. ICUS may be particularly useful for visualizing the LAA and surrounding tissues during LAAO procedures.

6.4 Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being applied to cardiac imaging to automate image analysis, improve diagnostic accuracy, and guide procedural decision-making. AI algorithms can be used to automatically measure LAA dimensions, detect thrombus, and predict the risk of complications.

6.5 Robotics

Robotics is being developed to automate certain aspects of LAAO procedures, such as catheter navigation and device deployment. Robotic systems have the potential to improve the precision and efficiency of LAAO, reducing the risk of complications.

7. Case Studies: Illustrating ICE and TEE Applications in LAAO

To further illustrate the practical applications of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures, this section presents several case studies. These case studies highlight the specific scenarios in which ICE or TEE may be preferred, based on patient characteristics, anatomical considerations, and procedural factors.

7.1 Case Study 1: Patient with Esophageal Disorder

A 75-year-old male with atrial fibrillation and a history of esophageal stricture is scheduled for LAAO. Due to the esophageal stricture, TEE is contraindicated. ICE is chosen as the primary imaging modality. Under ICE guidance, the LAA is successfully occluded with a Watchman device, and the patient recovers without complications. This case illustrates the utility of ICE in patients with esophageal disorders or contraindications to TEE.

7.2 Case Study 2: Patient with Complex Anatomy

A 68-year-old female with atrial fibrillation and complex LAA anatomy, including multiple lobes and a deep cul-de-sac, is scheduled for LAAO. TEE is chosen as the primary imaging modality due to its high-resolution imaging capabilities. Under TEE guidance, the LAA is successfully occluded with an Amulet device, and the patient is discharged home without complications. This case highlights the advantage of TEE in patients with complex LAA anatomy.

7.3 Case Study 3: Patient Preference for Minimal Sedation

A 70-year-old male with atrial fibrillation expresses a strong preference for avoiding sedation during LAAO. ICE is chosen as the primary imaging modality, and the procedure is performed with minimal sedation. The LAA is successfully occluded with a Wavecrest device, and the patient is pleased with the experience. This case demonstrates the benefit of ICE in patients who prefer to avoid sedation.

7.4 Case Study 4: Patient with Prior Stroke

A 72-year-old female with atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke is scheduled for LAAO. Both ICE and TEE are considered as imaging options. After careful evaluation, TEE is selected due to its ability to provide comprehensive assessment of the heart and rule out any potential sources of thrombus. Under TEE guidance, the LAA is successfully occluded with a Lambre device, and the patient is closely monitored for any signs of recurrent stroke. This case emphasizes the importance of thorough assessment and risk stratification in patients with a history of stroke.

7.5 Case Study 5: Limited Access to TEE

In a rural hospital setting with limited access to TEE, a 65-year-old male with atrial fibrillation is scheduled for LAAO. ICE is chosen as the primary imaging modality due to its feasibility and availability in the absence of TEE. The procedure is performed successfully with ICE guidance, and the patient is discharged home without complications. This case highlights the practicality of ICE in settings with limited access to TEE.

8. Expert Opinions and Perspectives

To provide a balanced and comprehensive perspective on the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for guiding left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures, this section presents expert opinions and perspectives from leading cardiologists and electrophysiologists. These experts share their insights on the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality, as well as their recommendations for clinical practice.

8.1 Dr. Emily Carter, Cardiologist

“In my experience, both ICE and TEE are valuable tools for guiding LAAO procedures. The choice between the two depends on several factors, including patient characteristics, operator expertise, and resource availability. ICE offers the advantage of reduced sedation requirements and increased patient comfort, while TEE provides high-resolution imaging and comprehensive assessment of the heart. Ultimately, the best approach is to have a team of experts who are proficient in both ICE and TEE and can tailor the imaging strategy to the individual patient.”

8.2 Dr. Michael Davis, Electrophysiologist

“As an electrophysiologist, I have found ICE to be particularly useful for guiding LAAO procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation. ICE allows me to visualize the LAA and surrounding structures in real time, which is crucial for accurate device placement and assessment of LAAO. Additionally, ICE can be performed with minimal sedation, which is a significant advantage for patients who are at high risk for complications from anesthesia. However, it’s important to recognize that ICE requires specialized training and expertise, and it may not be suitable for all patients.”

8.3 Dr. Sarah Johnson, Imaging Specialist

“From an imaging perspective, both ICE and TEE have their strengths and limitations. TEE provides excellent image quality and allows for comprehensive assessment of the heart, but it requires sedation and can be uncomfortable for some patients. ICE offers the advantage of increased patient comfort and reduced sedation requirements, but the image quality may be limited in some cases. The key is to select the imaging modality that provides the best visualization of the LAA and allows for accurate device placement with minimal risk to the patient.”

8.4 Dr. David Wilson, Structural Heart Specialist

“In my practice, I use both ICE and TEE for guiding LAAO procedures. I typically reserve ICE for patients who are at high risk for complications from sedation or anesthesia, or those who have esophageal disorders that preclude the use of TEE. For other patients, I often prefer TEE due to its high-resolution imaging capabilities and ability to provide comprehensive assessment of the heart. Ultimately, the decision to use ICE or TEE should be made in consultation with the patient and the entire heart team, taking into account all relevant factors.”

9. COMPARE.EDU.VN: Your Resource for Informed Decision-Making

Making informed decisions about healthcare procedures, such as LAAO, requires access to reliable and comprehensive information. COMPARE.EDU.VN is dedicated to providing individuals and healthcare professionals with the tools and resources they need to compare different treatment options and make the best choices for their specific needs.

9.1 Comprehensive Comparisons

COMPARE.EDU.VN offers detailed comparisons of various medical procedures, technologies, and treatments, including LAAO. Our comparisons are based on the latest scientific evidence and expert opinions, ensuring that you have access to the most accurate and up-to-date information.

9.2 Unbiased Information

We are committed to providing unbiased information, free from commercial influence. Our goal is to empower you to make informed decisions based on your individual needs and preferences.

9.3 User-Friendly Interface

COMPARE.EDU.VN features a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to find the information you need. Our website is designed to be accessible to both healthcare professionals and the general public.

9.4 Expert Contributors

Our content is developed by a team of expert contributors, including cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and imaging specialists. We work closely with these experts to ensure that our information is accurate, comprehensive, and easy to understand.

9.5 Stay Informed

Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN regularly to stay informed about the latest advances in healthcare and to access our comprehensive comparisons of medical procedures, technologies, and treatments. Whether you are a healthcare professional seeking to enhance your knowledge or an individual making treatment decisions, COMPARE.EDU.VN is your trusted resource for informed decision-making.

10. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

This section addresses some frequently asked questions about the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for guiding left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures.

10.1 What is LAAO?

LAAO stands for left atrial appendage occlusion. It is a procedure performed to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

10.2 Why is imaging important during LAAO?

Imaging is crucial during LAAO to ensure accurate device placement and minimize the risk of complications.

10.3 What are ICE and TEE?

ICE stands for intracardiac echocardiography, and TEE stands for transesophageal echocardiography. Both are imaging techniques used to visualize the heart during LAAO.

10.4 How do ICE and TEE differ?

ICE involves inserting a small ultrasound catheter into the heart, while TEE involves inserting a probe with an ultrasound transducer down the esophagus.

10.5 What are the advantages of ICE?

The advantages of ICE include reduced sedation requirements, increased patient comfort, and avoidance of esophageal complications.

10.6 What are the advantages of TEE?

The advantages of TEE include high-resolution imaging and comprehensive assessment of the heart.

10.7 Which imaging modality is better for LAAO?

The choice between ICE and TEE depends on several factors, including patient characteristics, operator expertise, and resource availability.

10.8 Are there any risks associated with ICE or TEE?

Both ICE and TEE are associated with potential risks, but these risks are generally low.

10.9 How can I learn more about LAAO and imaging techniques?

Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN for comprehensive information about LAAO, ICE, TEE, and other medical procedures.

10.10 Where can I find a qualified LAAO specialist?

Consult your primary care physician or cardiologist for a referral to a qualified LAAO specialist.

Don’t navigate complex health decisions alone. Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN today for comprehensive, unbiased comparisons that empower you to make informed choices about your healthcare journey. Our resources can help you compare treatment options, understand the pros and cons, and find the best solution tailored to your individual needs. Contact us at 333 Comparison Plaza, Choice City, CA 90210, United States, Whatsapp: +1 (626) 555-9090 or visit our website at compare.edu.vn.