Comparing GPU performance in 2025 is crucial for gamers, content creators, and professionals seeking optimal graphics solutions, and COMPARE.EDU.VN provides comprehensive analyses. By evaluating the latest graphics cards through extensive benchmarks and detailed comparisons, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your specific needs and budget. Utilize our resources for objective insights into GPU capabilities and make confident hardware choices, ensuring you stay ahead with cutting-edge graphics technology. Discover insights on rasterization, ray tracing capabilities and professional application performance.
1. GPU Benchmarks Introduction
Understanding GPU benchmarks and performance hierarchies is essential for anyone looking to optimize their computing experience, whether for gaming, AI workloads, or professional video editing. The graphics processing unit (GPU) plays a pivotal role in determining performance across various tasks. compare.edu.vn offers comprehensive comparisons, making it easy to assess different GPUs.
Our GPU benchmarks hierarchy ranks both current and previous-generation graphics cards based on their performance, using exhaustive benchmarks conducted by Tom’s Hardware. Whether you’re diving into the latest games, running AI tasks like Stable Diffusion, or editing professional videos, the GPU often has the most significant impact on your system’s performance. Even the best CPUs for gaming take a backseat to a capable GPU.
2. Recent GPU Releases and Market Dynamics
The graphics card market has been dynamic, with new releases from major players like Intel, Nvidia, and AMD. However, supply constraints and pricing issues have made it challenging for consumers to acquire the latest GPUs at their suggested retail prices (MSRP).
Intel has been active with the Arc B580, released in late 2024, and the Arc B570 in January 2025. Nvidia unveiled its Blackwell RTX 50-series architecture at CES 2025, launching the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 in late January, followed by the RTX 5070 Ti in February. Despite these releases, availability at MSRP has been a significant issue.
AMD entered the fray with the RX 9070 XT and RX 9070, both arriving in March, coinciding with Nvidia’s RTX 5070 launch. These cards, too, have faced immediate sell-outs, exacerbating the supply problem.
3. The Impact of AI on GPU Demand and Supply
The surge in demand for GPUs is largely driven by the artificial intelligence (AI) sector, which commands billions in sales. For instance, nearly 90% of Nvidia’s record-setting $130 billion in annual revenue for the last fiscal year came from AI-related sales, with gaming accounting for less than 9% of the total.
This shift has led to planning errors in the transition from previous to new-generation hardware, leaving a gap in the market as demand for older RTX 40-series and RX 7000-series GPUs remains strong. The result is a scarcity of reasonably priced graphics cards.
4. Tariffs and Market Instability
The graphics market faces additional challenges with the potential introduction of new tariffs on imported semiconductors, further impacting prices and availability. This creates a perfect storm of factors affecting the graphics card market.
5. Glimmers of Hope: Price Stabilization
Recent weeks have shown some promise, with certain graphics cards becoming available closer to their MSRPs. The RTX 5070, for example, has occasionally been in stock at its base price of $549. However, these instances are fleeting, and prices often revert to higher levels due to limited availability.
6. April 2025 Update: New Benchmarks and Test Suite
The latest update includes comprehensive benchmarks for the newest graphics cards, covering gaming, AI, professional, and content creation tests. Tom’s Hardware has transitioned the main page to feature the latest generation GPUs, relegating older results to “legacy” status.
The GPU test suite has been revamped with an upgraded test PC featuring an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and a socket AM5 platform. This upgrade necessitates retesting many GPUs to provide accurate comparisons.
7. Test Suite Overview
The GPU hierarchy includes traditional rendering (rasterization) benchmarks, ray tracing benchmarks, and content creation benchmarks. Ray tracing tests include AMD’s RX 7000/6000-series, Intel’s Arc, and Nvidia’s RTX cards. The content creation hierarchy ranks GPUs based on their performance in AI benchmarks and professional applications.
Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture powers its RTX 40-series, featuring DLSS 3 Frame Generation. DLSS 4 enhances upscaling, ray reconstruction, and introduces MFG (Multi Frame Generation) on the 50-series GPUs. AMD’s RDNA 3 architecture drives the RX 7000-series, while Intel’s Arc Alchemist architecture competes in the midrange segment.
8. Legacy GPU Benchmarks
For those interested in older hardware, Tom’s Hardware provides benchmark suites from 2024–2022 and 2020–2021, running on older testbeds. These legacy tables are not actively updated but offer valuable reference points.
The GPU benchmarks are sorted by performance, excluding factors such as real-world pricing, power consumption, efficiency, and features. The latest 2025 results are based on the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D testbed.
9. Rasterization GPU Benchmarks 2025
The latest benchmarks cover GPUs released over the past seven years, testing at 1080p medium, 1080p ultra, 1440p ultra, and 4K ultra settings. Scores are scaled relative to the GeForce RTX 5090 at 1080p ultra.
The test suite includes 14 rasterization games: Assassin’s Creed Mirage, Baldur’s Gate 3, Black Myth Wukong, Dragon Age: The Veilguard, Final Fantasy XVI, Flight Simulator 2020, Flight Simulator 2024, God of War Ragnarök, Horizon Forbidden West, The Last of Us Part 1, A Plague Tale: Requiem, Spider-Man 2, Stalker 2, Starfield, and Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2.
10. Rasterization GPU Benchmarks Rankings 2025
The following table summarizes rasterization performance across various resolutions and settings.
GPU Benchmarks Hierarchy — Rasterization Performance
| Graphics Card | Lowest Price | MSRP | 1080p Medium | 1080p Ultra | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications (Links to Review) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 5090 | $3,680 | $2,000 | 100.0% (197.5) | 100.0% (157.6) | 100.0% (143.0) | 100.0% (105.8) | GB202, 21760 shaders, 2407MHz, 32GB GDDR7@28Gbps, 1792GB/s, 575W |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | $2,925 | $1,600 | 98.5% (194.6) | 94.9% (149.6) | 88.2% (126.1) | 80.7% (85.4) | AD102, 16384 shaders, 2520MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | $1,449 | $1,000 | 90.4% (178.5) | 84.9% (133.9) | 78.1% (111.7) | 67.2% (71.1) | GB203, 10752 shaders, 2617MHz, 16GB GDDR7@30Gbps, 690GB/s, 360W |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Super | $1,230 | $1,000 | 88.2% (174.2) | 82.4% (129.9) | 73.5% (105.1) | 61.5% (65.0) | AD103, 10240 shaders, 2550MHz, 16GB GDDR6X@23Gbps, 736GB/s, 320W |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | $1,120 | $1,000 | 88.1% (174.1) | 79.4% (125.1) | 71.8% (102.6) | 60.8% (64.3) | Navi 31, 6144 shaders, 2500MHz, 24GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 960GB/s, 355W |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | $980 | $750 | 85.8% (169.4) | 79.1% (124.7) | 71.0% (101.5) | 58.7% (62.1) | GB203, 8960 shaders, 2452MHz, 16GB GDDR7@28Gbps, 896GB/s, 300W |
| Radeon RX 9070 XT | $1,070 | $600 | 85.6% (169.0) | 76.1% (119.9) | 68.7% (98.3) | 57.6% (61.0) | Navi 48, 4096 shaders, 2970MHz, 16GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 640GB/s, 304W |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | $1,149 | $800 | 80.8% (159.5) | 73.7% (116.2) | 64.0% (91.5) | 51.4% (54.4) | AD103, 8448 shaders, 2610MHz, 16GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 672GB/s, 285W |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | $650 | $750 | 81.3% (160.5) | 72.3% (114.0) | 63.9% (91.4) | 51.6% (54.6) | Navi 31, 5376 shaders, 2400MHz, 20GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 800GB/s, 315W |
| Radeon RX 9070 | $670 | $550 | 79.6% (157.1) | 69.6% (109.7) | 61.1% (87.4) | 50.2% (53.1) | Navi 48, 3584 shaders, 2520MHz, 16GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 640GB/s, 220W |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | $900 | $800 | 77.8% (153.5) | 70.3% (110.9) | 59.8% (85.5) | 47.1% (49.9) | AD104, 7680 shaders, 2610MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 504GB/s, 285W |
| GeForce RTX 5070 | $563 | $550 | 74.6% (147.4) | 67.5% (106.4) | 56.8% (81.3) | 44.9% (47.5) | GB205, 6144 shaders, 2512MHz, 12GB GDDR7@28Gbps, 672GB/s, 250W |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Super | $779 | $600 | 73.9% (145.8) | 66.6% (105.0) | 55.8% (79.7) | 43.4% (45.9) | AD104, 7168 shaders, 2475MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 504GB/s, 220W |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | $619 | $500 | 67.3% (132.8) | 57.2% (90.1) | 48.6% (69.5) | 38.5% (40.7) | Navi 32, 3840 shaders, 2430MHz, 16GB [email protected], 624GB/s, 263W |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | $719 | $550 | 65.6% (129.6) | 58.5% (92.1) | 47.9% (68.5) | 37.2% (39.4) | AD104, 5888 shaders, 2475MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 504GB/s, 200W |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB | $430 | $430 | 60.0% (118.4) | 53.0% (83.5) | 43.1% (61.6) | 33.4% (35.3) | GB206, 4608 shaders, 2572MHz, 16GB GDDR7@28Gbps, 448GB/s, 180W |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | $518 | $400 | 58.1% (114.8) | 50.2% (79.1) | 42.7% (61.0) | 32.8% (34.7) | Navi 32, 3456 shaders, 2544MHz, 12GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 432GB/s, 245W |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | $736 | $500 | 51.9% (102.4) | 45.9% (72.4) | 36.6% (52.4) | 27.6% (29.2) | AD106, 4352 shaders, 2535MHz, 16GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 288GB/s, 160W |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB | $533 | $400 | 52.4% (103.4) | 45.5% (71.8) | 34.2% (48.9) | 19.9% (21.1) | AD106, 4352 shaders, 2535MHz, 8GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 288GB/s, 160W |
| Radeon RX 7600 XT | $420 | $330 | 43.4% (85.6) | 36.7% (57.8) | 29.4% (42.1) | 21.4% (22.7) | Navi 33, 2048 shaders, 2755MHz, 16GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 288GB/s, 190W |
| Intel Arc B580 | $360 | $250 | 41.4% (81.8) | 35.8% (56.4) | 30.2% (43.2) | 23.7% (25.1) | BMG-G21, 2560 shaders, 2850MHz, 12GB GDDR6@19Gbps, 456GB/s, 190W |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | $390 | $300 | 42.2% (83.4) | 36.9% (58.2) | 27.5% (39.3) | 15.9% (16.8) | AD107, 3072 shaders, 2460MHz, 8GB GDDR6@17Gbps, 272GB/s, 115W |
| GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $330 | $330 | 35.5% (70.1) | 30.7% (48.3) | 24.4% (34.9) | 18.9% (20.0) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/s, 170W |
| Intel Arc B570 | $329 | $220 | 36.6% (72.3) | 30.3% (47.8) | 24.6% (35.2) | 15.2% (16.1) | BMG-G21, 2304 shaders, 2750MHz, 10GB GDDR6@19Gbps, 380GB/s, 150W |
| Intel Arc A770 16GB | $300 | $330 | 32.1% (63.4) | 29.8% (46.9) | 25.7% (36.7) | 21.0% (22.2) | ACM-G10, 4096 shaders, 2400MHz, 16GB [email protected], 560GB/s, 225W |
| Radeon RX 7600 | $283 | $270 | 40.6% (80.2) | 27.1% (42.7) | 19.7% (28.2) | 12.0% (12.7) | Navi 33, 2048 shaders, 2655MHz, 8GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 288GB/s, 165W |
| Intel Arc A750 | $200 | $200 | 29.0% (57.4) | 25.8% (40.7) | 21.6% (30.9) | 15.9% (16.9) | ACM-G10, 3584 shaders, 2350MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 225W |
| Radeon RX 6600 | $220 | $330 | 32.5% (64.1) | 23.6% (37.2) | 16.9% (24.1) | 11.6% (12.2) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W |
11. Key Findings in Rasterization Performance
One immediate observation is the limited performance separation between the fastest GPUs at lower resolutions. The delta between the RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 can be minimal at 4K ultra in certain games, such as Baldur’s Gate 3 and Assassin’s Creed Mirage. The RTX 5090 is only 24% faster than the 4090 at 4K but just 1.5% faster at 1080p medium.
The RTX 4090 leads the RTX 5080 by a significant margin, particularly at higher resolutions. AMD’s RX 7900 XTX edges out the 9070 XT by a small margin and trails behind Nvidia’s RTX 4080 Super.
The Intel Arc B580 stands out as a budget-friendly option, outperforming the RTX 4070 and RX 7600 XT at a lower cost.
12. Ray Tracing GPU Benchmarks 2025
Enabling ray tracing can significantly impact framerates. Tests are conducted using “medium” and “ultra” ray tracing settings in games that support the technology. The test suite includes Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora, Cyberpunk 2077, F1 24, and Spider-Man: Miles Morales, all using DirectX 12.
13. Ray Tracing GPU Benchmarks Rankings 2025
GPU Benchmarks Hierarchy — Ray Tracing Performance
| Graphics Card | Lowest Price | MSRP | 1080p Medium | 1080p Ultra | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications (Links to Review) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 5090 | $3,680 | $2,000 | 100.0% (200.3) | 100.0% (154.6) | 100.0% (137.7) | 100.0% (89.6) | GB202, 21760 shaders, 2407MHz, 32GB GDDR7@28Gbps, 1792GB/s, 575W |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | $2,925 | $1,600 | 91.9% (184.1) | 92.3% (142.7) | 85.5% (117.7) | 78.8% (70.6) | AD102, 16384 shaders, 2520MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | $1,449 | $1,000 | 86.2% (172.6) | 84.9% (131.2) | 73.0% (100.5) | 63.7% (57.0) | GB203, 10752 shaders, 2617MHz, 16GB GDDR7@30Gbps, 690GB/s, 360W |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Super | $1,230 | $1,000 | 83.2% (166.6) | 80.5% (124.4) | 68.5% (94.3) | 60.7% (54.4) | AD103, 10240 shaders, 2550MHz, 16GB GDDR6X@23Gbps, 736GB/s, 320W |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | $980 | $750 | 80.7% (161.6) | 77.9% (120.4) | 64.3% (88.5) | 54.5% (48.8) | GB203, 8960 shaders, 2452MHz, 16GB GDDR7@28Gbps, 896GB/s, 300W |
| Radeon RX 9070 XT | $1,070 | $600 | 76.9% (154.0) | 72.0% (111.2) | 58.7% (80.9) | 50.0% (44.8) | Navi 48, 4096 shaders, 2970MHz, 16GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 640GB/s, 304W |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | $1,149 | $800 | 76.7% (153.5) | 72.3% (111.8) | 57.7% (79.5) | 50.4% (45.1) | AD103, 8448 shaders, 2610MHz, 16GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 672GB/s, 285W |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | $900 | $800 | 73.4% (147.0) | 69.5% (107.4) | 54.4% (74.9) | 44.6% (40.0) | AD104, 7680 shaders, 2610MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 504GB/s, 285W |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | $1,120 | $1,000 | 70.0% (140.2) | 66.4% (102.6) | 54.0% (74.3) | 44.9% (40.2) | Navi 31, 6144 shaders, 2500MHz, 24GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 960GB/s, 355W |
| Radeon RX 9070 | $670 | $550 | 69.7% (139.6) | 63.7% (98.5) | 50.8% (69.9) | 42.0% (37.7) | Navi 48, 3584 shaders, 2520MHz, 16GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 640GB/s, 220W |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Super | $779 | $600 | 69.8% (139 |
