2024 Honda CR-V
2024 Honda CR-V

What Is Mazda Comparable To Honda CR V?

The Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V are both popular compact crossover SUVs, and understanding their similarities and differences is key to making an informed decision, which COMPARE.EDU.VN can help with. This article delves into a comprehensive comparison of these two vehicles, covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, and more. By exploring these aspects, you can determine which SUV aligns best with your needs and preferences.

1. Mazda CX-50 Vs. Honda CR-V: Price And Trims

The price and trim levels are crucial factors for potential buyers. Let’s break down the options for both models:

  • Mazda CX-50: Starts at around $32,000 and can go up to nearly $45,000. All-wheel drive (AWD) comes standard.
  • Honda CR-V: Begins at approximately $31,000, with the Sport Touring trim reaching above $42,000. AWD is an additional $1,500.
  • Hybrid Models: Both the CX-50 and CR-V hybrid versions start at close to $36,000.
  • Recommended Picks: CX-50 Hybrid Preferred and CR-V Hybrid Sport offer the best value.

Alt Text: Side view of a blue 2024 Honda CR-V parked on a paved road.

1.1. Mazda CX-50 Pricing And Trim Options

Mazda provides a wide range of choices for its compact crossover, spanning from entry-level to premium segments. The CX-50 offers three powertrain options across eight trim levels. Standard all-wheel drive is a significant advantage over the CR-V.

Both the CX-50 and CR-V base models include driver-assist technology, cloth upholstery, smartphone compatibility, and a 3-year/36,000-mile basic warranty.

The CX-50 2.5 S, even in its base Select form, offers wireless Apple CarPlay and an 8.8-inch infotainment screen. However, Mazda uses a console-mounted controller dial as the primary interface, which can be less intuitive than Honda’s touchscreen-focused system.

Options like a 10-speaker Bose audio system, leather seats, heated front power seats, and a panoramic sunroof are available on the $35,000 2.5S Premium. The CX-50 Hybrid Preferred is priced similarly, but upgrading to the Hybrid Premium trim for the same features costs around $39,000.

The turbocharged engine in the 2.5 Turbo trim increases the price to nearly $43,000 for the 2.5 Turbo Premium.

Alt Text: Front quarter view of a gray 2025 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid parked in a studio.

1.2. Honda CR-V Pricing And Trim Options

Even in its highest Hybrid Sport Touring trim, the Honda CR-V costs less, around $42,000. This includes all-wheel drive and premium features comparable to the CX-50 2.5 Turbo, such as a 9.0-inch touchscreen with wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, leather upholstery, 19-inch wheels, a Bose 12-speaker audio system, navigation, and a Wi-Fi hotspot.

This is a strong value, especially considering it’s only $11,000 more than the base front-wheel-drive CR-V LX, which includes a 7.0-inch touchscreen. The CR-V comes standard with a 7.0-inch digital instrument cluster, keyless start, and LED headlights across the lineup.

The CR-V Hybrid Sport AWD, priced at $37,500, is a recommended option. The Sport grade adds blacked-out trim, black 18-inch wheels, a leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob, a power driver’s seat, heated front seats, a sunroof, and blind-spot monitors.

Alt Text: Front view of a silver 2025 Honda CR-V driving on a highway.

1.3. Price And Value Advantage

Advantage: CR-V Hybrid.

2. CR-V Vs. CX-50: Performance And Specs

Performance and specifications are crucial for buyers seeking a balance between power and efficiency. Here’s how the CX-50 and CR-V stack up:

  • Mazda CX-50:
    • 2.5-liter inline-4: 187 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque
    • 2.5-liter turbo-4: 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque
    • CX-50 Hybrid: 219 hp and 163 lb-ft of torque (same as Toyota RAV4)
  • Honda CR-V:
    • 1.5-liter turbo-4: 190 hp and 179 lb-ft of torque
    • CR-V Hybrid Sport: 204 hp and 247 lb-ft of torque

Alt Text: Front quarter view of a red 2023 Honda CR-V parked in a suburban setting.

2.1. Mazda CX-50 Driving Experience

The Mazda CX-50 excels in handling and steering, offering a more engaging driving experience. Every CX-50 comes standard with all-wheel drive, enhancing its capability in various conditions. However, the CX-50 Hybrid can be noisy when pushed.

The CX-50’s drivetrain offers a mix of performance characteristics. The 6-speed automatic transmission allows the standard 2.5-liter inline-4 to rev higher, providing more power at higher speeds, but also increasing cabin noise. Sport mode enhances throttle response, while Off-road mode modulates it for better torque at low speeds. The CX-50’s charm lies in its excellent steering and poised handling.

It provides a comfortable ride, with a front strut and torsion beam rear suspension that balances firmness and softness. While not designed for aggressive cornering, its shorter height and lower center of gravity reduce body lean compared to the CR-V. The electric-assist steering ensures the CX-50 remains stable without constant corrections.

The available 2.5-liter turbo-4 enhances these Mazda traits, offering increased output (up to 256 hp and 320 lb-ft with 93-octane fuel). It pairs well with the 6-speed transmission for a sportier ride, though turbo lag is noticeable from a stop, even in Sport mode. Above 2,000 rpm, it delivers satisfying power for merging and on-ramp acceleration.

The Hybrid model accelerates to 60 mph in at least eight seconds and can be noisy under heavy acceleration. It can operate in EV mode at low speeds and is relatively quiet while cruising, but it lacks the overall refinement of the CR-V Hybrid.

Alt Text: Side view of a white 2023 Mazda CX-50 parked on a city street.

2.2. Honda CR-V Driving Experience

Honda CR-V hybrids, designated as Sport trims, prioritize comfort and efficiency over raw power. Despite the Sport designation, these models focus on delivering a smooth and efficient driving experience, even though they are quicker than non-hybrid versions. Sport, Sport-L, and Sport Touring grades combine a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine with a pair of electric motors. At low speeds, the 1.4-kWh battery pack powers the motors for electric drive. Under heavier acceleration, the engine primarily acts as a generator for the system, operating quietly in Eco and Normal modes. Simulated gear shifts reduce revs, and Sport mode adds simulated engine noise.

The CR-V handles with more body roll than the CX-50 but feels more connected to the road than the standard CR-V.

In non-hybrid CR-Vs, the 1.5-liter turbo-4’s lower peak torque (1,700 rpm vs. 2,000 rpm) makes it slightly quicker than the CX-50 Turbo, without the turbo lag. The CR-V’s CVT can cause engine whine under hard acceleration but is predictable and quiet around town.

Alt Text: Close-up of the front of a red 2024 Honda CR-V showcasing the grille and headlights.

2.3. Performance Advantage

Advantage: CX-50 Turbo for power, CR-V Hybrid for overall driving experience.

3. CR-V Vs. CX-50: Fuel Economy

Fuel economy is a key consideration for many buyers. Here’s a comparison of the EPA ratings for both models:

  • Honda CR-V:
    • Turbo-4: 28 mpg city, 34 highway, 30 combined (AWD loses 1 mpg)
    • Hybrid: 43 mpg city, 36 highway, 40 combined (FWD); 40 mpg city, 34 highway, 37 combined (AWD)
  • Mazda CX-50:
    • CX-50 Hybrid: 38 mpg combined
    • 2.5-liter: 25 mpg city, 31 highway, 28 combined (AWD)
    • Turbo: 23 mpg city, 29 highway, 25 combined (AWD)

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2025 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid showing the dashboard and infotainment screen.

3.1. Fuel Efficiency Comparison

The Honda CR-V Hybrid stands out with its superior fuel economy, making it a more efficient choice for daily commuting and long trips. The standard CR-V also offers better fuel efficiency than the non-hybrid CX-50 models.

3.2. Fuel Economy Advantage

Advantage: The Honda CR-V.

Alt Text: Front view of a gray 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium driving on a winding road.

Alt Text: Side view of a gray 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium parked on a scenic overlook.

Alt Text: Rear view of a gray 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium driving on a coastal highway.

4. CR-V Vs. CX-50: Size And Specs

Size and interior space are important factors for passenger and cargo needs. Here’s how the CX-50 and CR-V compare in terms of dimensions and cargo capacity:

  • Dimensions:
    • CX-50 is larger than the Mazda CX-5 but not as roomy as the CR-V.
    • CR-V is 184.8 inches long, slightly shorter than the CX-50.
  • Cargo Space:
    • CR-V: 39.2 cubic feet of cargo space
    • CX-50: 31.4 cubic feet of cargo space
  • Rear Legroom:
    • CR-V: 41 inches
    • CX-50: 39.8 inches
  • Hybrid Battery:
    • CR-V hybrid battery pack is under the cargo floor, not affecting cargo space.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid showing the spacious rear seats.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid showing the dashboard and infotainment system.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid showing the front seats and center console.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid showing the cargo area with the rear seats folded down.

4.1. Honda CR-V Size And Interior Space

The Honda CR-V comfortably seats four adults, with a middle seat suitable for occasional use. Honda excels at optimizing interior space. While the CR-V is slightly shorter than the CX-50, it is wider and taller, maximizing interior room.

The CR-V’s interior is designed for practicality, featuring a deep center console, large door pockets, and a tiered cargo floor on gas-only models. Upgrading from the base LX trim adds heated front seats with power adjustments for the driver.

The CR-V offers significantly more rear legroom and headroom than the CX-50. Its 41 inches of rear legroom is among the best in its class, resulting in an exceptionally spacious interior.

The CR-V’s vertical advantage also benefits cargo volume, offering 39.3 cubic feet of space with the rear seats up and 76.5 cubic feet with them folded down. However, the floor is not entirely flat when the rear seats are folded.

4.2. Mazda CX-50 Size And Interior Space

The Mazda CX-50 has a more premium interior finish than the CR-V, with leather upholstery, stylish stitching, and refined materials. However, it allows more tire and wind noise into the cabin. Designed to be larger than the Mazda CX-5, the CX-50 offers more room than the Toyota RAV4 but falls short of the CR-V in cargo and passenger space.

The front seats are supportive for all body types, with most models featuring power adjustments and seat heaters. The rear seats provide 39.8 inches of legroom, but the headroom is 37.5 inches, slightly less than the CR-V when both are equipped with sunroofs.

Cargo volume is smaller than the CR-V, with 31.4 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 56.3 cubic feet with the seats down.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Mazda CX-50 showing the front seats and center console.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Mazda CX-50 showing the rear seats and legroom.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Mazda CX-50 showing the dashboard and infotainment screen.

Alt Text: Interior view of a 2023 Mazda CX-50 showing the steering wheel and instrument cluster.

4.3. Size And Space Advantage

Advantage: Honda CR-V.

Alt Text: Rear view of a 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid showing the taillights and rear bumper.

Alt Text: Close-up of the Honda emblem on the rear of a 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid.

Alt Text: Front quarter view of a silver 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid parked on a city street.

5. Mazda CX-50 Vs. Honda CR-V: Safety

Safety is a paramount concern for car buyers. Here’s how the Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V perform in safety tests and features:

  • IIHS Ratings:
    • CX-50: IIHS Top Safety Pick+
    • CR-V: Top Safety Pick
  • NHTSA Ratings:
    • Both models: Five-star overall ratings
  • Standard Safety Features:
    • Both: Automatic emergency braking, active lane control, and adaptive cruise control

5.1. Mazda CX-50 Safety Analysis

The Mazda CX-50 is considered very safe, with top “good” crash ratings from the IIHS, including the updated moderate overlap front and side impact tests. However, rear visibility is limited, so the available surround-view camera system and parking sensors are valuable additions.

5.2. Honda CR-V Safety Analysis

The Honda CR-V also has excellent crash-test ratings, except for a “poor” result in the new IIHS moderate overlap test. The CX-50 includes blind-spot monitors as standard, while they are optional on the CR-V. Honda compensates with a standard rear-seat reminder and a driver attention monitor. Rear vision is slightly better in the CR-V, but it lacks the driver-assist options of the CX-50.

5.3. Safety Advantage

Advantage: CX-50.

Alt Text: Front quarter view of a gray 2024 Mazda CX-50 parked in front of a modern building.

6. CX-50 Vs. CR-V: Styling

Styling is subjective, but here’s a comparison of the design elements of the CX-50 and CR-V:

  • Mazda CX-50:
    • More rugged appearance compared to the CX-5
    • Boxier, bolder design, appealing to the American market
    • Refined interior with leather upholstery and contrast stitching
  • Honda CR-V:
    • A mix of design influences
    • Sport hybrid models add visual appeal with black wheels and dark trim
    • Civic-inspired interior with a mesh vent panel and tasteful accents

6.1. Mazda CX-50 Styling Overview

The Mazda CX-50 replaces the smooth lines of the CX-5 with a boxier, bolder design, aligning with the preferences of the American market. Features include a broad grille, bulging fenders, fake air intakes, and squared-off ends.

The interior has a removed center screen that stands out, but the rest of the design is clean and uncluttered. Available leather upholstery with contrast stitching adds a premium feel.

Alt Text: Front view of a red 2024 Honda CR-V parked on a city street.

6.2. Honda CR-V Styling Overview

The Honda CR-V features a blend of design elements. The LX and EX trims resemble the Volkswagen Tiguan, while the broader front grille is reminiscent of the mid-size Passport. Thin A-pillars are a nod to the latest Civic. The Sport hybrid models add visual interest with black wheels and dark exterior trim.

The Civic’s influence is evident inside, with a mesh vent panel and tasteful accents. A mechanical gear shifter is located on the center console, and the available 9.0-inch touchscreen is prominently displayed. Even the plastic parts have carbon fiber-like trim on the door panels.

6.3. Styling Advantage

Advantage: Draw.

Alt Text: Front quarter view of a blue 2024 Honda CR-V parked in a suburban neighborhood.

7. Comparing Mazda CX-50 To Honda CR-V: Which Is Better?

The Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-50 are both excellent compact crossover SUVs, but they cater to different priorities. The CR-V excels in practicality, fuel efficiency, and interior space, while the CX-50 offers a more engaging driving experience, a higher level of standard equipment, and a more rugged design.

7.1. Pros And Cons: Mazda CX-50

Pros:

  • Engaging driving dynamics
  • Standard all-wheel drive
  • More rugged styling
  • Higher-quality interior materials

Cons:

  • Lower fuel economy
  • Less cargo and passenger space
  • Noisy hybrid powertrain

7.2. Pros And Cons: Honda CR-V

Pros:

  • Excellent fuel economy, especially in hybrid form
  • Spacious interior with ample cargo and passenger room
  • Comfortable ride
  • Good safety ratings

Cons:

  • Less engaging driving experience
  • Less standard equipment
  • Styling may not appeal to everyone

7.3. Final Recommendation

The best choice depends on your priorities. If you value fuel efficiency, interior space, and practicality, the Honda CR-V Hybrid is the better option. If you prioritize driving dynamics, standard features, and a more rugged design, the Mazda CX-50 is a compelling alternative.

8. User Search Intent

Here are five user search intents related to the keyword “What Mazda Is Comparable To Honda Cr V”:

  1. Comparative Analysis: Users want a detailed comparison of Mazda models and the Honda CR-V to understand the similarities and differences.
  2. Alternative Options: Users seek alternative Mazda models that offer similar features or capabilities as the Honda CR-V.
  3. Feature Comparison: Users are interested in specific feature comparisons, such as performance, fuel economy, safety ratings, and interior space.
  4. Price Comparison: Users want to compare the pricing and available trims of comparable Mazda models to the Honda CR-V.
  5. User Reviews and Ratings: Users look for reviews and ratings from other owners to gain insights into the real-world performance and reliability of the compared models.

9. FAQ About Mazda Vs. Honda CR-V

Q1: What Mazda model is most comparable to the Honda CR-V in terms of size and features?

The Mazda CX-50 is the most comparable model to the Honda CR-V, offering similar features and size, though with a slightly different focus on driving dynamics and design.

Q2: How does the fuel economy of the Mazda CX-50 compare to the Honda CR-V?

The Honda CR-V generally offers better fuel economy, especially the hybrid version, compared to the Mazda CX-50.

Q3: Which SUV offers more cargo space, the Mazda CX-50 or the Honda CR-V?

The Honda CR-V offers more cargo space compared to the Mazda CX-50, making it a better choice for those needing extra storage.

Q4: Is the Mazda CX-50 or Honda CR-V safer?

Both SUVs are very safe, but the Mazda CX-50 has earned an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ award, while the Honda CR-V has a Top Safety Pick award. Both have five-star NHTSA overall ratings.

Q5: Which SUV has a more engaging driving experience?

The Mazda CX-50 generally offers a more engaging driving experience, with better handling and steering compared to the Honda CR-V.

Q6: What is the starting price of the Mazda CX-50 versus the Honda CR-V?

The Mazda CX-50 starts at around $32,000, while the Honda CR-V starts at approximately $31,000.

Q7: Do both the Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V offer hybrid models?

Yes, both the Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V offer hybrid models, providing enhanced fuel efficiency.

Q8: Which SUV has a more luxurious interior?

The Mazda CX-50 is often praised for its more luxurious interior materials and design compared to the Honda CR-V.

Q9: What standard safety features are included in both the Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V?

Both models include automatic emergency braking, active lane control, and adaptive cruise control as standard safety features.

Q10: Which SUV is better for off-road driving?

The Mazda CX-50, with its standard all-wheel drive and available off-road mode, is generally better suited for light off-road driving compared to the Honda CR-V.

10. Conclusion: Making The Right Choice

Choosing between the Mazda CX-50 and Honda CR-V depends on your individual needs and priorities. The Honda CR-V is a practical and efficient choice with ample space, while the Mazda CX-50 offers a more engaging driving experience and a stylish design.

Confused about which SUV is right for you? Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN for a comprehensive comparison and detailed reviews to help you make an informed decision. Our platform offers unbiased comparisons and user reviews to assist you in finding the perfect vehicle that fits your lifestyle and budget.

Make the smart choice today. Head over to COMPARE.EDU.VN and start comparing now!

Address: 333 Comparison Plaza, Choice City, CA 90210, United States

WhatsApp: +1 (626) 555-9090

Website: compare.edu.vn

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *