Perestroika and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) represent distinct approaches to reform and engagement. COMPARE.EDU.VN provides a detailed analysis of their similarities and differences, offering insights into their respective goals, implementation, and impacts. This comparative examination sheds light on the complexities of political and economic transformation and offers valuable lessons for policymakers and researchers alike. Explore comparative analysis, policy evaluation, and geopolitical strategy.
1. Understanding Perestroika and the European Neighbourhood Policy
Perestroika, meaning “restructuring,” was a series of political and economic reforms initiated in the Soviet Union by Mikhail Gorbachev in the mid-1980s. The ENP, launched by the European Union in 2004, aims to foster closer relations with countries bordering the EU to the east and south.
1.1. Perestroika: Restructuring the Soviet Union
Perestroika was a multifaceted reform movement designed to address the economic stagnation and political ossification that plagued the Soviet Union in the 1980s. Gorbachev’s reforms sought to decentralize economic decision-making, introduce market mechanisms, and increase transparency in governance.
1.2. The European Neighbourhood Policy: Building a Ring of Friends?
The ENP seeks to create a “ring of friends” around the EU, promoting stability, security, and prosperity in neighboring countries through political association, economic integration, and enhanced cooperation.
Alt: Map of countries included in the European Neighbourhood Policy, highlighting EU neighbors.
2. Key Similarities Between Perestroika and the ENP
While Perestroika and the ENP differ significantly in context and scope, they share several key similarities:
2.1. A Desire for Reform and Modernization
Both Perestroika and the ENP were driven by a desire to reform existing systems and modernize political and economic structures.
2.2. Engagement with External Actors
Both initiatives involved engagement with external actors, albeit in different ways. Perestroika sought to improve relations with the West, while the ENP aims to build partnerships with neighboring countries.
2.3. Addressing Internal Weaknesses
Both Perestroika and the ENP were, at least in part, responses to internal weaknesses or challenges. Perestroika aimed to address economic stagnation and political rigidity within the Soviet Union, while the ENP sought to address security concerns and promote stability in the EU’s neighborhood.
3. Key Differences Between Perestroika and the ENP
Despite their similarities, Perestroika and the ENP also exhibit significant differences:
3.1. Scope and Scale
Perestroika was a comprehensive reform program aimed at transforming the entire Soviet system, while the ENP is a more limited initiative focused on building relationships with neighboring countries.
3.2. Underlying Ideology
Perestroika was rooted in a socialist ideology, albeit one that sought to incorporate market mechanisms, while the ENP is based on liberal democratic principles.
3.3. Goals and Objectives
Perestroika aimed to revitalize the Soviet Union and preserve its status as a superpower, while the ENP seeks to promote stability and prosperity in the EU’s neighborhood without necessarily seeking to expand the EU’s borders.
3.4. Implementation Strategies
Perestroika involved top-down reforms initiated by the Soviet leadership, while the ENP relies on a combination of incentives and conditionalities to encourage reforms in neighboring countries.
3.5. Contextual Factors
Perestroika took place in the context of the Cold War and the decline of the Soviet Union, while the ENP operates in a post-Cold War environment characterized by globalization and regional integration.
4. Analyzing the Goals of Perestroika and the ENP
Understanding the goals of Perestroika and the ENP is essential for comparing their approaches and assessing their outcomes:
4.1. Perestroika’s Ambitions
Perestroika aimed to achieve several key goals:
- Economic Revitalization: To stimulate economic growth and improve living standards by introducing market mechanisms and decentralizing economic decision-making.
- Political Reform: To increase transparency and accountability in government, promote greater citizen participation, and reduce corruption.
- Improved International Relations: To improve relations with the West, reduce Cold War tensions, and foster greater cooperation on global issues.
4.2. The ENP’s Objectives
The ENP seeks to achieve the following objectives:
- Political Association: To promote political reforms, strengthen democratic institutions, and enhance cooperation on issues such as human rights and the rule of law.
- Economic Integration: To foster economic growth and development through trade liberalization, investment promotion, and regulatory convergence.
- Enhanced Cooperation: To strengthen cooperation on issues such as security, energy, and the environment.
5. Implementation Strategies: Top-Down vs. Incentives-Based
Perestroika and the ENP adopted different implementation strategies:
5.1. Perestroika’s Top-Down Approach
Perestroika was implemented through top-down reforms initiated by the Soviet leadership. These reforms included:
- Economic Decentralization: Granting greater autonomy to state-owned enterprises and allowing for the creation of cooperatives and private businesses.
- Price Reforms: Gradually lifting price controls and allowing market forces to play a greater role in determining prices.
- Political Liberalization: Introducing greater freedom of speech and assembly, releasing political prisoners, and allowing for greater media independence.
5.2. The ENP’s Incentives-Based Approach
The ENP relies on a combination of incentives and conditionalities to encourage reforms in neighboring countries. These include:
- Financial Assistance: Providing financial assistance to support reforms and development projects.
- Trade Preferences: Granting preferential access to the EU market for goods from neighboring countries.
- Visa Facilitation: Easing visa requirements for citizens of neighboring countries.
- Political Dialogue: Engaging in regular political dialogue to promote reforms and address concerns.
6. Assessing the Outcomes and Impacts
Both Perestroika and the ENP have had mixed outcomes and impacts:
6.1. Perestroika’s Unintended Consequences
Perestroika’s reforms unleashed forces that ultimately led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. These included:
- Economic Disruption: The introduction of market mechanisms without adequate regulation led to economic disruption, inflation, and shortages.
- Political Instability: The loosening of political controls led to increased ethnic tensions, nationalist movements, and demands for greater autonomy.
- Loss of Control: The Soviet leadership lost control over the reform process, as different factions within the Communist Party and society pursued their own agendas.
6.2. The ENP’s Mixed Results
The ENP has achieved some successes in promoting reforms and cooperation in neighboring countries, but it has also faced challenges and limitations:
- Uneven Progress: Progress has been uneven across different countries and sectors, with some countries making greater strides than others.
- Limited Impact: The ENP has had a limited impact on some of the most pressing challenges facing neighboring countries, such as conflict, corruption, and poverty.
- Geopolitical Constraints: The ENP’s effectiveness has been constrained by geopolitical factors, such as the rise of Russia and China, and the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria.
7. Lessons Learned and Implications for Policymakers
The experiences of Perestroika and the ENP offer several valuable lessons for policymakers:
7.1. The Importance of Context
Reforms must be tailored to the specific context and circumstances of each country or region. What works in one context may not work in another.
7.2. The Need for Comprehensive Strategies
Reforms should be comprehensive and address all aspects of the system, including economic, political, and social dimensions. Piecemeal reforms may be ineffective or even counterproductive.
7.3. The Role of External Actors
External actors can play a positive role in supporting reforms, but they must be sensitive to local conditions and avoid imposing their own agendas.
7.4. The Importance of Ownership
Reforms are more likely to be successful if they are owned and driven by local actors. External actors can provide support and assistance, but they cannot impose reforms from the outside.
7.5. The Risks of Unintended Consequences
Reforms can have unintended consequences, both positive and negative. Policymakers must be aware of these risks and take steps to mitigate them.
8. Perestroika and The ENP: A Comparative Table
| Feature | Perestroika | European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) |
|---|---|---|
| Initiator | Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Union) | European Union |
| Time Period | Mid-1980s | 2004 – Present |
| Primary Goal | Restructuring Soviet economy & politics | Promoting stability & cooperation with neighbors |
| Scope | Internal reforms within the USSR | External policy towards neighboring countries |
| Economic Approach | Introducing market mechanisms | Economic integration and assistance |
| Political Aim | Increase transparency & reduce control | Promoting democratic values and governance |
| Key Strategies | Decentralization, openness (Glasnost) | Incentives, partnerships, conditionality |
| Geopolitical Context | Cold War era, declining Soviet influence | Post-Cold War, EU enlargement |
| Outcomes | Dissolution of the Soviet Union | Mixed; varying success across countries |
| Main Focus | Domestic reform | External relations |
9. Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Tactics and Their Impacts
Russia’s approach to hybrid warfare presents a multifaceted challenge to the security landscape, blending conventional military tactics with unconventional methods to achieve its strategic objectives. This approach involves the coordinated use of military force, cyber warfare, disinformation campaigns, economic coercion, and support for proxy groups to destabilize targeted states and undermine international norms.
9.1 The Evolution of Hybrid Warfare
Hybrid warfare represents a departure from traditional forms of conflict, blurring the lines between peace and war. It allows Russia to exert influence and achieve its goals while minimizing the risk of direct military confrontation with stronger adversaries.
9.2 Private Military Companies and Their Role
One key element of Russia’s hybrid warfare strategy is the use of Private Military Companies (PMCs), such as the Wagner Group. These PMCs operate as semi-state security forces, providing deniable support to Russian foreign policy objectives in regions such as Ukraine, Syria, and Africa.
Alt: Wagner Group fighters, showcasing their role in supporting Russian foreign policy objectives.
9.3 The Wagner Group: A Case Study in Russian Hybrid Warfare
The Wagner Group’s activities exemplify Russia’s use of PMCs to project power and influence abroad. The group has been implicated in human rights abuses, war crimes, and destabilizing activities in multiple countries.
9.4 The Use of Far-Right Groups
In addition to PMCs, Russia has also been accused of supporting and manipulating far-right groups in Europe to sow discord and undermine democratic institutions. These groups often share ideological affinities with Russia’s nationalist agenda and serve as useful tools for spreading disinformation and propaganda.
9.5 Russia’s Information Warfare Tactics
Russia’s information warfare tactics involve the use of state-controlled media, social media platforms, and troll farms to spread disinformation, propaganda, and conspiracy theories. These efforts aim to undermine trust in democratic institutions, exacerbate social divisions, and influence public opinion in favor of Russian interests.
9.6 Legal Ambiguities
The ambiguous legal status of PMCs under international law allows Russia to exploit loopholes and deny any direct involvement in their activities. This deniability makes it difficult to hold Russia accountable for the actions of its proxies and complicates efforts to counter its hybrid warfare tactics.
9.7 Lawfare Strategies
Russia employs “lawfare” strategies to exploit inadequate laws and loopholes within international legislation, allowing it to operate on the edge of the law or in territories where the law has no application. This approach enables Russia to pursue its objectives while minimizing the risk of legal repercussions.
10. The Role of Far-Right Extremism in Russia’s Expansionist Ambitions
Russia’s cultivation of relationships with far-right extremist groups serves as a strategic tool to undermine the existing European security order and advance its geopolitical interests. By exploiting ideological affinities and providing support to these groups, Russia seeks to sow discord, destabilize democratic institutions, and promote its own nationalist agenda.
10.1 The Russian Imperial Movement (RIM)
The Russian Imperial Movement (RIM) stands as a prominent example of a far-right group with ties to Russia. Despite being based in Russia, RIM has played a significant role in the far-right landscape of Ukraine and other European countries.
10.2 RIM’s Ideological Alignment with Russian Interests
RIM’s pro-Russian stance and ultranationalist ideology align closely with the Kremlin’s agenda, making it a valuable asset for advancing Russia’s interests abroad. The group’s activities include paramilitary training, recruitment of foreign fighters, and promotion of anti-Western narratives.
10.3 Training Camps
RIM operates training camps where right-wing extremists receive instruction in paramilitary tactics and ideological indoctrination. These camps serve as incubators for radicalism and provide a platform for networking and collaboration among far-right activists from different countries.
10.4 Connections with the Kremlin
Despite its extremist ideology and activities, RIM maintains close ties with elements within the Russian government and security apparatus. This support enables the group to operate with impunity and expand its reach both domestically and internationally.
10.5 Undermining European Unity
Russia’s support for far-right groups undermines European unity and cohesion by fueling nationalist sentiments, xenophobia, and anti-immigrant sentiment. These divisions weaken the EU’s ability to respond effectively to external challenges and advance its own interests.
11. Contrasting Russia’s Actions with the Aims of the ENP
Russia’s actions in the Eastern Neighbourhood stand in stark contrast to the aims of the ENP, which seeks to promote stability, democracy, and prosperity in the region. While the EU has invested heavily in supporting reforms and fostering cooperation with its neighbors, Russia has actively worked to undermine these efforts through military aggression, political interference, and economic coercion.
11.1 Undermining the ENP’s Objectives
Russia’s actions in Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova have directly undermined the ENP’s objectives by fueling conflict, destabilizing governments, and hindering economic development. These actions have created a climate of fear and uncertainty that discourages investment and undermines confidence in the rule of law.
11.2 Russia’s Vision for the Region
Russia’s vision for the Eastern Neighbourhood is one of dominance and control, where neighboring countries are subservient to its interests and constrained in their ability to pursue independent foreign policies. This vision is incompatible with the ENP’s emphasis on partnership, mutual respect, and shared values.
11.3 Fueling Conflict
Russia’s support for separatist movements and armed conflicts in the Eastern Neighbourhood has fueled instability and human suffering, creating humanitarian crises and displacing millions of people. These conflicts have also undermined regional security and increased the risk of further escalation.
11.4 Interfering with Democratic Processes
Russia has interfered in the domestic affairs of Eastern Neighbourhood countries through disinformation campaigns, cyberattacks, and support for pro-Russian political parties. These efforts aim to undermine democratic processes, manipulate public opinion, and install puppet governments that are loyal to Moscow.
11.5 Economic Coercion
Russia has used economic coercion as a tool to pressure Eastern Neighbourhood countries into aligning with its policies. This includes using energy supplies as leverage, imposing trade barriers, and supporting corrupt business practices that benefit Russian interests.
12. Addressing Misconceptions and Myths about Perestroika and the ENP
Several misconceptions and myths surround Perestroika and the ENP, obscuring their true nature and impact:
12.1. Perestroika as a Western Plot
One common myth is that Perestroika was a Western plot designed to undermine the Soviet Union. In reality, Perestroika was initiated by Soviet leaders in response to internal problems and challenges.
12.2. The ENP as a Tool for EU Expansion
Another misconception is that the ENP is a tool for EU expansion. While the ENP does promote closer relations with neighboring countries, it does not necessarily lead to EU membership.
12.3. Perestroika as a Complete Failure
Some view Perestroika as a complete failure because it led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, Perestroika also had some positive effects, such as increasing freedom of speech and assembly.
12.4. The ENP as a Panacea for the Region
Others view the ENP as a panacea for the region’s problems. While the ENP has achieved some successes, it has also faced limitations and challenges.
13. Modern Applications of Comparative Policy Analysis
The comparative analysis of Perestroika and the ENP has modern applications for policy analysis, international relations, and political science.
13.1. Evaluating Reform Initiatives
The lessons learned from Perestroika and the ENP can inform the design and implementation of reform initiatives in other countries and regions.
13.2. Understanding Geopolitical Dynamics
The comparative analysis of Perestroika and the ENP can shed light on the geopolitical dynamics shaping the Eastern Neighbourhood and the broader international system.
13.3. Informing Policy Decisions
The insights gained from this analysis can inform policy decisions related to international development, security, and diplomacy.
14. FAQ: Perestroika and the European Neighbourhood Policy
14.1. What was the main goal of Perestroika?
The main goal was to restructure the Soviet economy and political system to make it more efficient and responsive to the needs of the people.
14.2. What are the key objectives of the ENP?
The key objectives are to promote political association, economic integration, and enhanced cooperation with neighboring countries.
14.3. How did Perestroika differ from previous Soviet reforms?
Perestroika went further than previous reforms in terms of decentralization, openness, and engagement with the West.
14.4. What are the main challenges facing the ENP?
The main challenges include uneven progress, limited impact, and geopolitical constraints.
14.5. What lessons can be learned from Perestroika and the ENP?
Lessons include the importance of context, the need for comprehensive strategies, and the risks of unintended consequences.
14.6. How does Russia’s actions affect the ENP?
Russia’s actions in the Eastern Neighbourhood undermine the ENP’s objectives by fueling conflict, destabilizing governments, and hindering economic development.
14.7. What role do Private Military Companies play in Russian foreign policy?
Private Military Companies, like the Wagner Group, are used to project power and influence abroad, providing deniable support to Russian foreign policy objectives.
14.8. How does the EU address the challenges posed by Russia in the Eastern Neighbourhood?
The EU addresses these challenges through a combination of diplomatic engagement, financial assistance, and security cooperation.
14.9. What is the significance of the Russian Imperial Movement?
The RIM is a far-right group with ties to Russia that promotes ultranationalist ideology and engages in paramilitary training and recruitment.
14.10. How can comparative policy analysis inform policy decisions related to international relations?
Comparative policy analysis can provide insights into the factors that contribute to the success or failure of different policy approaches, informing decisions related to international development, security, and diplomacy.
15. Conclusion: Drawing Parallels and Differences
While Perestroika and the European Neighbourhood Policy share the common thread of seeking reform and engagement, their fundamental differences in scope, ideology, and context underscore the complexities of political and economic transformation. Perestroika was an internal restructuring of a superpower grappling with systemic stagnation, while the ENP is an external policy aimed at fostering stability and cooperation with neighboring countries.
The contrasting outcomes of these initiatives provide valuable lessons for policymakers navigating the challenges of reform and engagement in a rapidly changing world. Understanding the nuances of each approach, as facilitated by resources like COMPARE.EDU.VN, is crucial for crafting effective strategies that promote positive change and mitigate potential risks.
Seeking clarity in complex comparisons? Visit COMPARE.EDU.VN today to access comprehensive analyses and make informed decisions. Our platform provides detailed comparisons, objective evaluations, and user reviews to help you navigate a wide range of choices. Whether you are comparing products, services, or ideas, compare.edu.vn empowers you to make confident decisions based on reliable information. Contact us at 333 Comparison Plaza, Choice City, CA 90210, United States, or Whatsapp: +1 (626) 555-9090.
Bibliography
- Aliyev, H., 2016. Strong militias, weak states and armed violence: Towards a theory of ‘state-parallel’ paramilitaries. Security Dialogue, 47 (6), 498–516.
- Aliyev, H., 2020. Is Ukraine a Hub for International White Supremacist Fighters? | Russia Matters.
- Baranovsky, V., 1997. Russia and Europe: The Emerging Security Agenda | SIPRI. Oxford University Press.
- Buštíková, L., 2018. The Radical Right in Eastern Europe.
- Carpenter, M., 2018. Russia Is Co-opting Angry Young Men [online]. The Atlantic. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/08/russia-is-co-opting-angry-young-men/568741/ [Accessed 15 Mar 2021].
- Chifu, I & Frunzeti, T. (2020) From Mercenary Companies to Private Defence. The Case of Russian Private Military Companies (National Defence University, Washington D.C. 2020)
- Commision of the European Communities, 2003. Communication from the EU Commission to the Council of the EU Parliament: Wider Europe — Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours.
- Council of the European Union, 2009. Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit.
- Council of the European Union, 2015. Outcome report of the meeting with Eurojust Contact Points and Liaison Magistrates | Eurojust | European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.
- Deep, A. ‘Hybrid War: Old Concept, New Techniques’, Small Wars Journal, 2015. Available at: https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/hybrid-war-old-concept-new- techniques (Accessed: 1 October 2020).
- Dyner, A.M. (2018) The Role of Private Military Contractors in Russian Foreign Policy (Polish Institute of International affairs, No. 64 (1135), 4 May 2018, 2.
- EEAS, 2016. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign And Security Policy.
- El Economista, 2017. Putin apoya a la extrema derecha para dividir Europa, dice Timmermans – EcoDiario.es [online]. Available from: https://ecodiario.eleconomista.es/global/noticias/8260811/03/17/Putin-apoya-a-la-extrema-derecha-para-dividir-Europa-dice-Timmermans.html [Accessed 19 Mar 2021].
- Glantz, D.M. (1995) The Evolution of Soviet Operational Art, 1927–1991: The Documentary Basis. Routledge, London.
- Gorbachev, M., 1989. “Europe as a Common Home”.
- Harding, L. (2020) Shadow State: murder Mayhem and Russia’s Remaking of the West (Guardian Faber, London, 2020)
- Holcomb, F. (2017) “The Kremlin’s Irregular Army: Ukrainian Separatist Order of Battle,” Russia and Ukraine Security Report 3, (September 2017), 9, Institute for the Study of War. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/HUDOC_38263_08_Annexes_ENG.pdf
- Hoffman, F.G. (2007) Conflict in the 21st Century: The rise of Hybrid Wars. (Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies)
- Horvath, R., 2015. The Euromaidan and the crisis of Russian nationalism. Nationalities Papers, 43 (6), 819–839.
- House of Lords, 2015. The EU and Russia: before and beyond the crisis in Ukraine, (HL Paper 115), 123.
- IGTDS, 2020. Combat training for European neo-Nazis in Russia [online]. IGTDS. Available from: https://igtds.org/blog/2020/06/09/combat-training-for-european-neo-nazis-in-russia/ [Accessed 20 Mar 2021].
- International Committee of the Red Cross, “Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) of 8 June 1977,” Geneva, Switzerland, May 2010, available at www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0321.pdf
- Karagiannis, E., 2016. Ukrainian volunteer fighters in the eastern front: ideas, political-social norms and emotions as mobilization mechanisms. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16 (1), 139–153.
- Kaunert, C. and Léonard, S., 2011. EU counterterrorism and the European neighbourhood policy: an appraisal of the southern dimension. Terrorism and political violence, 23 (2), 286–309.
- Kazharski, A., 2020. Civilizations as Ontological Security? Stories of the Russian Trauma. Problems of Post-Communism, 67 (1), 24–36.
- Kissinger, H.A., 2014. Henry Kissinger: To settle the Ukraine crisis, start at the end. Washington Post, 5 Mar.
- Klebnikov, P. (2001) Godfather of the Kremlin: The Decline of Russia in the Age of Gangster Capitalism (Mariner Books, Boston, 2001),
- Lister, T., 2020. The Nexus Between Far-Right Extremists in the United States and Ukraine. Combating Terrorism Center at West Point.
- Marten, K. (2019) Russia’s use of Semi-State Security Forces: The Case of the Wagner Group (Post Soviet Affairs, 35.3)
- Mearsheimer, J.J. and Walt, S.M., 2007. The Israel lobby and US foreign policy. Macmillan.
- Milne, S., 2014. The clash in Crimea is the fruit of western expansion | Seumas Milne. the Guardian, 5 Mar.
- Oliphant, R., 2020. Far-Right Russian group claims Donald Trump labelled them terrorists to win election. The Telegraph, 12 Apr.
- Omelicheva, M., 2020. Designating the Russian Imperial Movement a Terrorist Organization: a Drop in the Bucket of Needed U.S. Counter-Extremism Responses – PONARS Eurasia [online]. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/. Available from: https://www.ponarseurasia.org/designating-the-russian-imperial-movement-a-terrorist-organization-a-drop-in-the-bucket-of-needed-u-s-counter-extremism-responses/ [Accessed 20 Mar 2021].
- OSCE, 1990. Charter of Paris for a New Europe [online]. Available from: https://www.osce.org/mc/39516 [Accessed 12 Nov 2020].
- Østensen, A.G. & Bukkvoll, T. (2022) Private Military Companies- Russian Great Power Politics on the Cheap?, Small Wars and Insurgencies, 33: 1-2.
- Pindjak, P. (2014) ‘Deterring Hybrid Warfare: A Chance for NATO to and the EU to work together’, NATO Review, 2014.
- Pompeo, M., 2020. United States Designates Russian Imperial Movement and Leaders as Global Terrorists [online]. United States Department of State. Available from: https://2017-2021.state.gov/united-states-designates-russian-imperial-movement-and-leaders-as-global-terrorists/ [Accessed 20 Mar 2021].
- Putin, V., 2014. Address by President of the Russian Federation • President of Russia [online]. Available from: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603 [Accessed 4 Aug 2020].
- Sakwa, R., 2011. Russia’s Identity: Between the ‘Domestic’ and the ‘International’. Europe-Asia Studies, 63 (6), 957–975.
- Sakwa, R., 2012. The problem of ‘the international’ in Russian identity formation. International Politics, 49.
- Sakwa, R., 2015. The death of Europe? Continental fates after Ukraine. International Affairs, 91 (3), 553–579.
- Sakwa, R., 2017. Russia against the rest: The post-cold war crisis of world order. Cambridge University Press.
- Shekhovtsov, A., 2015a. Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog: Russian politicians building an international extreme right alliance. Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog.
- Shekhovtsov, A., 2015b. Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog: Russian fascist militants give money to Swedish counterparts. Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog.
- Shekhovtsov, A., 2015c. Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog: What does the fascist conference in St. Petersburg tell us about contemporary Russia? Anton Shekhovtsov’s blog.
- The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) | EU Neighbours [online], 2021. Available from: https://www.euneighbours.eu/en/policy/european-neighbourhood-policy-enp [Accessed 6 Aug 2021].
- Tsygankov, A., 2016. Crafting the state-civilization Vladimir Putin’s turn to distinct values. Problems of Post-Communism, 63 (3), 146–158.
- Umland, A., 2019. Irregular Militias and Radical Nationalism in Post-Euromaydan Ukraine: The Prehistory and Emergence of the “Azov” Battalion in 2014. Terrorism and Political Violence, 31 (1), 105–131.
- Welle, D., 2020. German neo-Nazis trained at Russian camps: report | DW | 05.06.2020.
- Yudina, N. and Verkhovsky, A., 2019. Russian Nationalist Veterans of the Donbas War. Nationalities Papers, 47 (5), 734–749.
- Zielonka, J., 2006. Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union.
- Zwolski, K., 2017. Wider Europe, Greater Europe? David Mitrany on European Security Order. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55 (3), 645–661.
