Deciding between the Mazda CX-5 and CX-30 can be a tough choice for SUV shoppers. Both offer Mazda’s signature driving dynamics and stylish design, but cater to slightly different needs and preferences. Having spent time with both, including experiencing a CX-5 as a loaner while my CX-30 was in service, and even test driving a CX-5 GT Reserve, I can offer a comparison to help you make the best decision.
Initially, my experience started with a Mazda CX-30 Premium FWD. The comfort during long drives, even a 1000-mile trip, was surprisingly good. When my CX-30 was in for a minor cosmetic warranty repair, the dealership provided a CX-5 Sport loaner. To be frank, it felt basic. Later, a CX-9 Touring with the premium package loaner offered a taste of the turbo engine and upgraded features like a larger screen and Bose speakers, which was a notable step up. This sparked curiosity about the CX-5 Turbo, leading to a test drive of the CX-5 GT Reserve trim.
Comparing the CX-30 and CX-5 directly, the turbo engine in the CX-5 GT Reserve is enjoyable, but for the price jump from the CX-30, it didn’t feel like a necessary upgrade. The CX-30 shines with its modern technology, including a standard rear camera, and a focus on driver and front passenger comfort. The Bose audio system in the CX-30 is also a standout feature, delivering excellent sound quality. Handling in the CX-30 is responsive and engaging, making everyday driving enjoyable, even without a turbo.
Space is a key differentiator. The CX-30’s rear seats are adequate but can feel limited, especially for taller passengers. If you frequently transport adults in the back or require significant cargo space, the CX-5 offers a more spacious cabin and cargo area. For even more space, the CX-9 Touring with premium package becomes an interesting option, offering substantial cargo room, especially with the third row folded, and increased headroom and a higher driving position.
Ultimately, the “better” choice between the Mazda CX-5 and CX-30 depends on your priorities. If you value a balance of modern features, comfort for front occupants, and engaging driving dynamics at a competitive price, the CX-30 is compelling. If you prioritize passenger and cargo space and desire a more traditional SUV size, the CX-5 is the logical step up. However, for those needing maximum space and considering spending more, exploring the CX-9 could also be worthwhile. Perhaps a future CX-5 redesign, possibly a CX-50, will bridge this gap, incorporating the latest Kodo design language and addressing some of the current CX-5’s shortcomings in perceived value compared to its siblings.
