The 2025 Toyota RAV4 and 2025 Honda CR-V stand as titans in the competitive compact SUV segment, appealing to families and individuals alike with their blend of efficiency, spaciousness, and versatility. For those who don’t require a third row and are mindful of budget, these models offer a compelling sweet spot. From a broad overview to the nitty-gritty details of specifications and pricing, it’s evident why the CR-V and RAV4 remain highly sought-after vehicles, even amidst evolving discussions about brand reliability.
Crossover utility vehicles like the CR-V and RAV4 have effectively become the modern family vehicle, mirroring the role sedans played a generation ago. They prioritize car-like handling and ride comfort over truck-like ruggedness, while still offering a touch of off-road capability and increased ground clearance. Their adaptable interiors and slightly elevated seating position enhance ease of entry and exit, making tasks like managing child seats, kids, and groceries more convenient. Furthermore, in an era where the average new car price approaches $50,000, both the CR-V and RAV4 can be acquired for around $30,000 in base configurations and up to approximately $40,000 when fully equipped, including fuel-efficient hybrid options.
A notable exception to typical configurations is the Toyota RAV4 Plug-in Hybrid. This model boasts a more potent 302-horsepower hybrid system coupled with an 18.1-kWh battery pack, providing an impressive 42 miles of all-electric range on a full charge. It stands as the performance and innovation leader within the RAV4 lineup, a feature not currently matched by any offering in the Honda CR-V range.
Honda CR-V vs. Toyota RAV4: Price and Feature Showdown
- Entry-level trims for both SUVs hover around the $30,000 mark.
- RAV4 distinguishes itself with a Plug-in Hybrid variant.
- CR-V Hybrid available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive; RAV4 Hybrid exclusively AWD.
- Top recommendations: CR-V LX or Sport Hybrid, RAV4 XLE or XLE Hybrid.
Honda CR-V Pricing and Trims
The Honda CR-V starts at approximately $31,000 for the base LX front-wheel-drive model. Standard features at this level include keyless start, adaptive cruise control, LED headlights, 17-inch alloy wheels, and a 7.0-inch touchscreen infotainment system equipped with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Across the entire CR-V lineup, including hybrid models, all-wheel drive is available for an additional $1,500.
Moving up the trim ladder, the mid-range EX and EX-L versions enhance comfort and convenience. The EX trim adds features such as a power driver’s seat, heated front seats, a sunroof, blind-spot monitoring, and 18-inch wheels. The EX-L trim marks the entry point to the larger 9.0-inch touchscreen within the non-hybrid range and further includes eight-speaker audio and wireless smartphone charging.
The CR-V Hybrid models are offered in Sport and Sport-L trims, distinguished by a sportier aesthetic featuring blackout accents and black-painted 18-inch wheels, along with the smaller touchscreen. The Sport-L trim elevates the experience with a power tailgate, leather upholstery, and wireless device charging. At the pinnacle of the lineup is the CR-V Sport Touring Hybrid, priced around $42,000, which boasts Bose audio, 19-inch wheels, and an integrated navigation system. Optional features across the CR-V range are primarily limited to special paint colors, a tow hitch, and cargo accessories.
Toyota RAV4 Pricing and Trims
Excluding the plug-in hybrid model, the Toyota RAV4 offers a diverse lineup encompassing front-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive gasoline versions, as well as all-wheel-drive Hybrid variants. The RAV4 starts at around $30,000 for the base LE trim and extends up to approximately $41,000 for the Hybrid Limited AWD. Across the non-hybrid RAV4 models, upgrading to all-wheel drive incurs a premium of $1,400.
The base LE trim includes 17-inch steel wheels, adaptive cruise control, a suite of active safety features, and an 8.0-inch touchscreen infotainment system with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
The RAV4 XLE, starting at $31,680, adds a power-adjustable driver’s seat, blind-spot monitoring, and alloy wheels, with optional upgrades for heated seats and a sunroof. The XLE Premium trim, priced at $34,425, introduces synthetic leather upholstery and automatic climate control.
Hybrid options begin with the Hybrid LE at approximately $33,000—a modest $1,650 increase compared to a non-hybrid LE AWD at the time of writing. The XLE Hybrid approaches $35,000, and with optional heated seats, it may fulfill the needs of most RAV4 shoppers. The non-Plug-in Hybrid RAV4 range culminates with the $41,600 Hybrid Limited, potentially reaching $44,000 with options like a panoramic roof, heated and cooled front seats, a heated steering wheel, and an Advanced Technology Package featuring wireless device charging, hands-free tailgate operation, and a surround-view camera system.
Positioned between trims, the Hybrid SE emerges as a compelling mid-level value choice at around $36,000, while the top-tier Plug-in Hybrid commands a price nearing $50,000.
Pricing Advantage: Toyota RAV4. All-wheel drive in the high-mpg hybrid form comes at no extra cost compared to FWD hybrid.
Toyota RAV4 vs. Honda CR-V: Size, Dimensions, and Cargo Capacity
- CR-V is marginally longer and lower in profile than the RAV4.
- CR-V offers superior cargo volume with both rear seats up and folded down.
- RAV4 boasts slightly greater overall height and, in certain configurations, increased ground clearance.
The Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 exhibit remarkably similar dimensions, aligning closely with competitors like the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester. The Toyota RAV4 typically measures around 181 inches in length, 73 inches in width, and 67 inches in height across most trims, riding on a wheelbase of approximately 106 inches. In comparison, the CR-V is approximately 185 inches long, 74 inches wide, and 67 inches tall, also featuring a wheelbase of about 106 inches.
These dimensions translate to a slightly more spacious cabin in the CR-V, which is evident both in official measurements and perceived space. While the RAV4 cabin adopts a somewhat more upright design, the CR-V’s interior simply feels roomier, particularly in both the front and rear seating areas. In terms of passenger volume, the CR-V offers 103.5 cubic feet, while the RAV4 provides 98.9 cubic feet. Regarding cargo capacity, the RAV4 provides 37.5 cubic feet behind the rear seats, expanding to nearly 70 cubic feet with the rear seats folded. However, the CR-V surpasses these figures with approximately 39 cubic feet behind the rear seats and an expansive 76.5 cubic feet with the seats folded. Real-world observations indicate that while the RAV4’s rear seats fold relatively flat, the CR-V’s seats do not quite achieve a perfectly flat cargo floor.
In practical usability and comfort, the RAV4 lags slightly behind in front-seat comfort compared to the CR-V, which offers superior support and overall comfort. Furthermore, the Honda boasts larger rear door openings, facilitating easier ingress and egress. Due to the seating position and roofline design, taller passengers may find headroom more accommodating in the Honda compared to the Toyota.
Size Advantage: CR-V.
Toyota RAV4 vs Honda CR-V: Towing Capabilities
- RAV4 Adventure and RAV4 TRD trims can tow up to 3,500 pounds.
- For those considering even occasional towing, the CR-V Hybrid’s 1,000-pound limit may be insufficient.
- The Toyota hybrid powertrain offers surprisingly capable light towing.
The RAV4 Hybrid is rated for towing up to 1,750 pounds, while most gasoline models are rated for 1,500 pounds.
The plug-in hybrid RAV4 extends its towing capacity to 2,500 pounds.
In contrast, the CR-V’s towing figures are lower—up to 1,500 pounds for non-hybrid versions—and its CVT automatic transmission may not be as well-suited for towing as the RAV4’s 8-speed automatic. While the CR-V Hybrid’s instant torque and predominantly electric propulsion might seem advantageous for towing, Honda rates this system at just 1,000 pounds—suitable primarily for light-duty towing like small garden trailers.
Towing Advantage: Toyota RAV4.
Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4: Off-Road Prowess
- RAV4 Adventure and TRD Off-Road trims are no longer part of the current lineup.
- Both model ranges offer approximately eight inches of ground clearance in most configurations.
- Hybrid versions of each SUV employ distinct all-wheel-drive systems.
The Honda CR-V provides 7.8 inches of ground clearance in its front-wheel-drive configurations and 8.2 inches with all-wheel drive. The RAV4 lineup exhibits slightly more variation in ground clearance depending on the trim level, generally offering up to 8.1 inches.
All-wheel-drive CR-Vs utilize a mechanical all-wheel-drive system to distribute power to the rear wheels when necessary, regardless of whether they are hybrid or gasoline-powered. Non-hybrid all-wheel-drive RAV4s employ a similar mechanical system. However, RAV4 Hybrid models incorporate a separate electric motor at the rear wheels, which is part of the hybrid system but not mechanically linked to the engine or front transaxle. Both systems present unique strengths and weaknesses. Real-world experience suggests that the RAV4 Hybrid’s AWD system exhibits impressive sophistication in snowy conditions, which is likely the most common scenario where AWD is beneficial for most drivers.
Off-Road Advantage: Toyota RAV4, although dedicated trail-focused trims are no longer available.
Toyota RAV4 vs Honda CR-V: Safety Ratings and Features
- Both SUVs generally achieve strong safety ratings, with minor areas for improvement.
- RAV4 exhibits slightly superior overall crash-test performance.
- Both CR-V and RAV4 are recognized as 2024 IIHS Top Safety Picks.
- Blind-spot monitors are standard across all CR-V trims but optional on certain RAV4 models.
Both the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V demonstrate commendable safety performance, although there’s still room for enhancement in certain areas. The RAV4 has earned a five-star overall rating from the NHTSA NCAP program, which is considered less stringent. It achieves a Top Safety Pick designation from the IIHS but falls short of the Top Safety Pick+ award due to an “Acceptable” rating in the updated side-impact test.
The Honda CR-V’s performance is comparable, but it fares slightly worse in IIHS testing, receiving a “Poor” rating in the updated moderate overlap frontal test, despite achieving a “Good” rating in the updated side-impact test. Similar to the RAV4, the CR-V family secures a five-star NHTSA rating, comprised of a mix of four- and five-star scores across different evaluations.
Both models come equipped with standard automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and active lane control, along with headlights that have performed well in evaluations. Blind-spot monitors are not standard on base trims of either vehicle. However, challenging rearward visibility and the absence of a standard surround-view camera system ultimately place the CR-V slightly behind in terms of comprehensive safety features and visibility aids.
Safety Advantage: Toyota RAV4.
Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4: Performance and Driving Dynamics
- Non-hybrid powertrains: CR-V features a 1.5-liter turbo-4 engine with a CVT; RAV4 uses a 2.5-liter inline-4 engine with an 8-speed automatic transmission.
- RAV4 handling can vary significantly across different trim levels.
- All CR-V versions offer superior ride quality and handling characteristics.
The Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 offer comparable power and performance figures, but their powertrains and power delivery mechanisms differ significantly, from non-hybrid to hybrid versions.
The CR-V’s 1.5-liter turbo-4 engine produces 190 horsepower and 179 lb-ft of torque. Paired with a continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT), it may not deliver rapid acceleration but provides smooth and adequate power for everyday driving and highway merging. Honda has refined this powertrain combination, incorporating simulated “gear shifts” into the transmission for enhanced drivability. For drivers who prioritize smoothness and quiet operation over outright speed, this setup is quite satisfying.
Base RAV4 models employ a 2.5-liter inline-4 engine generating 203 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque. While the 8-speed automatic transmission responds effectively, the overall powertrain lacks refinement and tends to be somewhat noisy and unpolished. Ultimately, it does not offer a significant performance advantage over the Honda in terms of 0-60 mph times (approximately eight seconds for both at best).
Both the RAV4 and CR-V reach their peak performance and refinement in hybrid configurations. For a modest price increase, hybrid versions provide improved performance, greater refinement, and significantly enhanced fuel economy. Toyota’s hybrid system includes a separate motor for the rear wheels and delivers a combined 219 horsepower, making the SUV considerably quicker than the modest power increase over the base engine might suggest. Honda’s hybrid system utilizes two electric motors—one directly driving the wheels for most of the time. It produces 204 horsepower and 247 lb-ft of torque, offering an electric-vehicle-like driving experience, although the engine can become somewhat strained on extended inclines.
In terms of driving dynamics, the Honda CR-V surpasses the RAV4, offering superior handling, a more comfortable ride, and a quieter cabin environment overall.
Performance Advantage: Honda CR-V, for its superior handling and ride comfort.
Toyota RAV4 vs Honda CR-V: Fuel Efficiency and MPG
- Non-hybrid CR-V models achieve 29 or 30 mpg combined; non-hybrid RAV4s range from 28-30 mpg combined.
- RAV4 Hybrid achieves 40 mpg combined for most trims; CR-V matches this with front-wheel drive but slightly drops to 37 mpg with AWD.
- RAV4 Plug-in Hybrid achieves 38 mpg combined and offers 42 miles of all-electric range on a full charge.
The Honda CR-V, in non-hybrid configuration with its turbo-4 engine and CVT, achieves impressive EPA ratings of 28 mpg city, 34 highway, and 30 mpg combined with front-wheel drive. Adding all-wheel drive reduces the combined rating by only 1 mpg.
Base-level RAV4s with front-wheel drive are rated at 27 mpg city, 35 highway, and 30 mpg combined by the EPA. All-wheel-drive versions slightly reduce fuel economy to 29 mpg combined, or 28 mpg for the off-road-oriented trims. Hybrid versions, which are available at a modest price premium, excel in efficiency, achieving 41 mpg city, 38 highway, and 40 mpg combined for most configurations, with 37 mpg combined for the trail-focused Hybrid Woodland Edition.
The RAV4 Plug-in Hybrid, offering 42 miles of electric range, is rated at 38 mpg combined once the electric charge is depleted and provides a total driving range of 600 miles.
Fuel Economy Advantage: Toyota RAV4—particularly in hybrid form due to its superior MPG and plug-in option.
Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4: Interior Design, Infotainment, and Technology
- RAV4 features a larger base touchscreen and an even larger 10.5-inch screen in select trims.
- Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are wired in base Hondas, wireless with the 9.0-inch screen and standard in all RAV4s.
- Satellite radio is limited to higher trims in the CR-V but widely available across the RAV4 lineup.
Both the CR-V and RAV4 are contemporary crossovers equipped with comprehensive smartphone integration via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. However, it’s important to note that the 7.0-inch touchscreen infotainment system in the base Honda CR-V requires a wired connection, while both the 9.0-inch system in higher CR-V trims and the 8.0-inch system in all RAV4s offer wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
Despite this, many may find the layout and menu structure of Honda’s infotainment systems more intuitive and user-friendly compared to the latest Toyota system. While Toyota’s system incorporates Google point-of-interest functionality, it may not optimally utilize screen real estate and has eliminated many physical buttons.
Higher RAV4 trims, including TRD Off-Road, Hybrid XSE, Plug-in Hybrid XSE, and all Limited models, feature a larger 10.5-inch touchscreen system. Limited trims also include a 12.3-inch reconfigurable digital gauge cluster.
In terms of amenities, both models are relatively evenly matched. Mid-range trims in both lineups offer features such as a power liftgate, wireless device charging, heated rear outboard seats, and expansive sunroof options. The RAV4 stands out by offering a head-up display in top-spec versions. A notable omission in the CR-V is satellite radio, which is only available on EX-L and Sport Touring trims.
Base RAV4 LE versions may exhibit a more budget-oriented feel, particularly in terms of materials and finishes, reminiscent of the Corolla. However, stepping up to the XLE Premium trim significantly elevates the cabin ambiance with faux-leather upholstery, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, and rear-seat vents, as well as optional 11-speaker JBL audio.
While the RAV4 enhances its interior in higher trims, the Honda CR-V generally presents a more upscale feel even in its base configuration, featuring better upholstery and a more refined aesthetic throughout, extending to touchpoints, trim elements, and switchgear.
Interior Advantage: Honda CR-V wins for its more upscale cabin ambience.
CR-V or RAV4: Which Compact SUV is the Superior Choice?
The Toyota RAV4 achieves a TCC Rating of 6.5 out of 10, while the Honda CR-V earns a slightly higher 7.0, primarily due to its performance and comfort advantages. (For further details, refer to how we rate cars.) The Toyota RAV4 distinguishes itself with a wider array of specialized trims and capabilities, including the highly sought-after and more premium Plug-in Hybrid variant. Its hybrid system also seamlessly integrates all-wheel drive. However, the Honda CR-V ultimately prevails due to its superior refinement, comfort, and poise, offering a more compelling overall vehicle experience for the money.
